INVERTEBRATE AVAILABILITY FOR WILD TURKEY POULTS IN THE SOUTHERN APPALACHIANS

Abstract: We determined macroinvertebrate availability for wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) poults in western North Carolina in relation to vegetation and topography. More invertebrates were found within forest stands than openings; however, the density of preferred insects was equal to or higher i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Craig A. Harper, Jody K. Knox, David C. Guynn Jr., J. Rickie Davis, James G. Williams
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2000-01-01
Series:Wildlife Society Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2328-5540.2000.tb00264.x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850225157432410112
author Craig A. Harper
Jody K. Knox
David C. Guynn Jr.
J. Rickie Davis
James G. Williams
author_facet Craig A. Harper
Jody K. Knox
David C. Guynn Jr.
J. Rickie Davis
James G. Williams
author_sort Craig A. Harper
collection DOAJ
description Abstract: We determined macroinvertebrate availability for wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) poults in western North Carolina in relation to vegetation and topography. More invertebrates were found within forest stands than openings; however, the density of preferred insects was equal to or higher in openings than in forested habitats. Density and biomass of invertebrate classes varied among forest types and age classes. Overall invertebrate density and biomass were positively correlated with herbaceous cover and leaf litter weight within the forest strata. The importance of vegetation structure for invertebrates and wild turkey poults is discussed. Unmanaged openings of naturally occurring forbs and grasses harbored more invertebrates (all classes combined) than openings managed for various clovers and orchardgrass; however, density and biomass of preferred insects did not differ between opening types. Recommendations for managing openings for wild turkey broods on national forests in the southern Appalachians include eliminating perennial grasses from the initial planting mixture and adopting a minimum maintenance philosophy.
format Article
id doaj-art-0625853d9a5346f29213bc3bcb2daeb6
institution OA Journals
issn 2328-5540
language English
publishDate 2000-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wildlife Society Bulletin
spelling doaj-art-0625853d9a5346f29213bc3bcb2daeb62025-08-20T02:05:27ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402000-01-012000S114515610.1002/j.2328-5540.2000.tb00264.xINVERTEBRATE AVAILABILITY FOR WILD TURKEY POULTS IN THE SOUTHERN APPALACHIANSCraig A. Harper0Jody K. Knox1David C. Guynn Jr.2J. Rickie Davis3James G. Williams4Department of Forest ResourcesClemson UniversityClemsonSC29634USADepartment of Forest ResourcesClemson UniversityClemsonSC29634USADepartment of Forest ResourcesClemson UniversityClemsonSC29634USADepartment of Forest ResourcesClemson UniversityClemsonSC29634USADepartment of Forest ResourcesClemson UniversityClemsonSC29634USAAbstract: We determined macroinvertebrate availability for wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) poults in western North Carolina in relation to vegetation and topography. More invertebrates were found within forest stands than openings; however, the density of preferred insects was equal to or higher in openings than in forested habitats. Density and biomass of invertebrate classes varied among forest types and age classes. Overall invertebrate density and biomass were positively correlated with herbaceous cover and leaf litter weight within the forest strata. The importance of vegetation structure for invertebrates and wild turkey poults is discussed. Unmanaged openings of naturally occurring forbs and grasses harbored more invertebrates (all classes combined) than openings managed for various clovers and orchardgrass; however, density and biomass of preferred insects did not differ between opening types. Recommendations for managing openings for wild turkey broods on national forests in the southern Appalachians include eliminating perennial grasses from the initial planting mixture and adopting a minimum maintenance philosophy.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2328-5540.2000.tb00264.xbroodsfood plotsinsectsmacroinvertebratesMeleagris gallopavoopenings
spellingShingle Craig A. Harper
Jody K. Knox
David C. Guynn Jr.
J. Rickie Davis
James G. Williams
INVERTEBRATE AVAILABILITY FOR WILD TURKEY POULTS IN THE SOUTHERN APPALACHIANS
Wildlife Society Bulletin
broods
food plots
insects
macroinvertebrates
Meleagris gallopavo
openings
title INVERTEBRATE AVAILABILITY FOR WILD TURKEY POULTS IN THE SOUTHERN APPALACHIANS
title_full INVERTEBRATE AVAILABILITY FOR WILD TURKEY POULTS IN THE SOUTHERN APPALACHIANS
title_fullStr INVERTEBRATE AVAILABILITY FOR WILD TURKEY POULTS IN THE SOUTHERN APPALACHIANS
title_full_unstemmed INVERTEBRATE AVAILABILITY FOR WILD TURKEY POULTS IN THE SOUTHERN APPALACHIANS
title_short INVERTEBRATE AVAILABILITY FOR WILD TURKEY POULTS IN THE SOUTHERN APPALACHIANS
title_sort invertebrate availability for wild turkey poults in the southern appalachians
topic broods
food plots
insects
macroinvertebrates
Meleagris gallopavo
openings
url https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2328-5540.2000.tb00264.x
work_keys_str_mv AT craigaharper invertebrateavailabilityforwildturkeypoultsinthesouthernappalachians
AT jodykknox invertebrateavailabilityforwildturkeypoultsinthesouthernappalachians
AT davidcguynnjr invertebrateavailabilityforwildturkeypoultsinthesouthernappalachians
AT jrickiedavis invertebrateavailabilityforwildturkeypoultsinthesouthernappalachians
AT jamesgwilliams invertebrateavailabilityforwildturkeypoultsinthesouthernappalachians