Comparison of the Clinical Recovery after Nerve Defect Reconstruction Using 4 Different Methods – Experimental Model
There are several possibilities for repairing a nerve defect. These include nerve grafting, tissues for bridging, biological or synthetic nerve conduits. Such conduits, alone or filled with different tissues or substances, may be the key for a major breakthrough in the modern treatment of nerve defe...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Bucharest College of Physicians
2021-06-01
|
| Series: | Modern Medicine |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://medicinamoderna.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Comparison-of-the-Clinical-Recovery-after-Nerve-Defect-Reconstruction-Using-4-Different-Methods-%E2%80%93-Experimental-Model-1.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849768229391564800 |
|---|---|
| author | Andrei MARIN Anica DRICU Georgiana Gabriela MARIN Carmen GIUGLEA |
| author_facet | Andrei MARIN Anica DRICU Georgiana Gabriela MARIN Carmen GIUGLEA |
| author_sort | Andrei MARIN |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | There are several possibilities for repairing a nerve defect. These include nerve grafting, tissues for bridging, biological or synthetic nerve conduits. Such conduits, alone or filled with different tissues or substances, may be the key for a major breakthrough in the modern treatment of nerve defects. The easiest way to research these new methods is by experimental in vivo research on live animals – such as the Wistar rats. The following article aims to compare 4 different types of repairs for nerve defects: the nerve graft, a biologic nerve conduit (rat aorta), rat aorta with platelet rich plasma and rat aorta with stem cells. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-059024246be04dbfbdab3383e12a58cb |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1223-0472 2360-2473 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-06-01 |
| publisher | Bucharest College of Physicians |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Modern Medicine |
| spelling | doaj-art-059024246be04dbfbdab3383e12a58cb2025-08-20T03:03:53ZengBucharest College of PhysiciansModern Medicine1223-04722360-24732021-06-01282223233https://doi.org/10.31689/rmm.2021.28.2.223Comparison of the Clinical Recovery after Nerve Defect Reconstruction Using 4 Different Methods – Experimental ModelAndrei MARIN0Anica DRICU1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3039-857XGeorgiana Gabriela MARIN2Carmen GIUGLEA3Department of Plastic Surgery, „Sf. Ioan” Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, RomaniaDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Craiova, RomaniaDepartment of Cardiology, „Prof. Dr. C.C. Iliescu” Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases, Bucharest, RomaniaDepartment of Plastic Surgery, „Sf. Ioan” Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, RomaniaThere are several possibilities for repairing a nerve defect. These include nerve grafting, tissues for bridging, biological or synthetic nerve conduits. Such conduits, alone or filled with different tissues or substances, may be the key for a major breakthrough in the modern treatment of nerve defects. The easiest way to research these new methods is by experimental in vivo research on live animals – such as the Wistar rats. The following article aims to compare 4 different types of repairs for nerve defects: the nerve graft, a biologic nerve conduit (rat aorta), rat aorta with platelet rich plasma and rat aorta with stem cells.https://medicinamoderna.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Comparison-of-the-Clinical-Recovery-after-Nerve-Defect-Reconstruction-Using-4-Different-Methods-%E2%80%93-Experimental-Model-1.pdfperipheral nerve reconstructionexperimental microsurgerystems cellsplatelet rich plasmanerve conduit |
| spellingShingle | Andrei MARIN Anica DRICU Georgiana Gabriela MARIN Carmen GIUGLEA Comparison of the Clinical Recovery after Nerve Defect Reconstruction Using 4 Different Methods – Experimental Model Modern Medicine peripheral nerve reconstruction experimental microsurgery stems cells platelet rich plasma nerve conduit |
| title | Comparison of the Clinical Recovery after Nerve Defect Reconstruction Using 4 Different Methods – Experimental Model |
| title_full | Comparison of the Clinical Recovery after Nerve Defect Reconstruction Using 4 Different Methods – Experimental Model |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of the Clinical Recovery after Nerve Defect Reconstruction Using 4 Different Methods – Experimental Model |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Clinical Recovery after Nerve Defect Reconstruction Using 4 Different Methods – Experimental Model |
| title_short | Comparison of the Clinical Recovery after Nerve Defect Reconstruction Using 4 Different Methods – Experimental Model |
| title_sort | comparison of the clinical recovery after nerve defect reconstruction using 4 different methods experimental model |
| topic | peripheral nerve reconstruction experimental microsurgery stems cells platelet rich plasma nerve conduit |
| url | https://medicinamoderna.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Comparison-of-the-Clinical-Recovery-after-Nerve-Defect-Reconstruction-Using-4-Different-Methods-%E2%80%93-Experimental-Model-1.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT andreimarin comparisonoftheclinicalrecoveryafternervedefectreconstructionusing4differentmethodsexperimentalmodel AT anicadricu comparisonoftheclinicalrecoveryafternervedefectreconstructionusing4differentmethodsexperimentalmodel AT georgianagabrielamarin comparisonoftheclinicalrecoveryafternervedefectreconstructionusing4differentmethodsexperimentalmodel AT carmengiuglea comparisonoftheclinicalrecoveryafternervedefectreconstructionusing4differentmethodsexperimentalmodel |