Effect of Thinning on Tree Differentiation, Productivity and Carbon Stocks of Cryptomeria japonica Plantations
ABSTRACT Stand structure affects tree efficiency for a competitive use of resources and largely determines stand productivity and carbon stocks. Consequently, research on individual size and differentiation of stand structures is critical for improving monoculture‐stand productivity and carbon stock...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Ecology and Evolution |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71418 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | ABSTRACT Stand structure affects tree efficiency for a competitive use of resources and largely determines stand productivity and carbon stocks. Consequently, research on individual size and differentiation of stand structures is critical for improving monoculture‐stand productivity and carbon stock. Here, we studied the effects of four thinning intensities (CK: 0%, T1: 20%, T2: 30%, and T3: 40%) in an experimental plantation of Cryptomeria japonica var. sinensis, and assessed the individual differentiation characteristics, diameter class‐frequency distribution, stand productivity, and carbon stocks over 6 years. The results showed that the Gini coefficient decreased with increasing thinning intensity and stand age. Self‐thinning of the C. japonica stands occurred even after thinning, and the self‐thinning rate was relatively high at the age of 10–13 years. For T2 and T3 treatments, the self‐thinning did not occur in the 6th year after thinning. The mean diameter of each treatment increased with increasing stand age, and the normal distribution curve of diameter class frequency gradually shifted to the right, with small changes in the CK treatment and the larger one in treatment T3. Thinning increased the large‐diameter (DBH ≥ 26 cm) timber, especially in T2 and T3 treatments. Stand volume and productivity varied with stand age, with the greatest change in stand volume observed in T3, followed by that in the CK treatment. Stand productivity at different thinning intensities generally decreased and then increased with increasing stand age. Although the carbon stock of individual trees and stand increased with time, the individual trees appeared to have an obviously increasing trend with increasing thinning intensity. The results provided important insights into the implications of designing thinning intensity and timing, and determining the tree‐size class removal to meet specific management objectives. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2045-7758 |