Prevalence, management, and outcomes of haemorrhagic events in left ventricular assist device recipients

Abstract Aims Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have reduced the mortality of patients with advanced heart failure both as bridge‐to‐transplant and as destination therapy. However, LVADs are associated with various complications, including bleedings, which affect the prognosis. The aim of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laetitia Pourtau, Maxime Beneyto, Jean Porterie, Jerome Roncalli, Montse Massot, Caroline Biendel, Pauline Fournier, Romain Itier, Michel Galinier, Olivier Lairez, Clement Delmas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-06-01
Series:ESC Heart Failure
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13899
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832540297136963584
author Laetitia Pourtau
Maxime Beneyto
Jean Porterie
Jerome Roncalli
Montse Massot
Caroline Biendel
Pauline Fournier
Romain Itier
Michel Galinier
Olivier Lairez
Clement Delmas
author_facet Laetitia Pourtau
Maxime Beneyto
Jean Porterie
Jerome Roncalli
Montse Massot
Caroline Biendel
Pauline Fournier
Romain Itier
Michel Galinier
Olivier Lairez
Clement Delmas
author_sort Laetitia Pourtau
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aims Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have reduced the mortality of patients with advanced heart failure both as bridge‐to‐transplant and as destination therapy. However, LVADs are associated with various complications, including bleedings, which affect the prognosis. The aim of the study was to explore the prevalence, management, and outcomes of haemorrhagic adverse events in LVAD recipients. Methods and results We conducted a retrospective, single‐centre, cohort study including all patients who received an LVAD from January 2008 to December 2019 in our tertiary centre (Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France). Bleeding events, death, and heart transplantation were collected from electronic medical files. Eighty‐eight patients were included, and 43 (49%) presented at least one bleeding event. Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding was the most frequent (n = 21, 24%), followed by epistaxis (n = 12, 14%) and intracranial haemorrhage (n = 9, 10%). Bleeding events were associated with increased mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 3.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5–9.3, P < 0.01], particularly in case of intracranial haemorrhage (HR 14.6, 95% CI 4.2–51.1, P < 0.0001). GI bleedings were associated with a trend towards increased mortality (HR 3.0, 95% CI 0.9–9.3, P = 0.05). Each bleeding episode multiplied the risk of death by 1.8 (95% CI 1.2–2.7, P < 0.01). Finally, only early bleedings (<9 months post‐implantation) had an impact on mortality (HR 4.2, 95% CI 1.6–11.1, P < 0.01). Therapeutic management was mainly based on temporary interruption of anticoagulation and permanent interruption of antiplatelet therapy. Invasive management was rarely performed. Conclusions Haemorrhagic events in LVAD recipients are frequent and associated with increased mortality. GI bleedings are the most frequent, and intracranial haemorrhages the most associated with mortality. Management remains empirical requiring more research.
format Article
id doaj-art-0524d618e0214bb9ae5750ecff93e927
institution Kabale University
issn 2055-5822
language English
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series ESC Heart Failure
spelling doaj-art-0524d618e0214bb9ae5750ecff93e9272025-02-05T05:22:10ZengWileyESC Heart Failure2055-58222022-06-01931931194110.1002/ehf2.13899Prevalence, management, and outcomes of haemorrhagic events in left ventricular assist device recipientsLaetitia Pourtau0Maxime Beneyto1Jean Porterie2Jerome Roncalli3Montse Massot4Caroline Biendel5Pauline Fournier6Romain Itier7Michel Galinier8Olivier Lairez9Clement Delmas10Department of Cardiology Rangueil University Hospital 1 avenue Jean Poulhès, TSA 50032 Toulouse 31059 FranceDepartment of Cardiology Rangueil University Hospital 1 avenue Jean Poulhès, TSA 50032 Toulouse 31059 FranceDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery Rangueil University Hospital Toulouse FranceDepartment of Cardiology Rangueil University Hospital 1 avenue Jean Poulhès, TSA 50032 Toulouse 31059 FranceDepartment of Cardiology Rangueil University Hospital 1 avenue Jean Poulhès, TSA 50032 Toulouse 31059 FranceDepartment of Cardiology Rangueil University Hospital 1 avenue Jean Poulhès, TSA 50032 Toulouse 31059 FranceDepartment of Cardiology Rangueil University Hospital 1 avenue Jean Poulhès, TSA 50032 Toulouse 31059 FranceDepartment of Cardiology Rangueil University Hospital 1 avenue Jean Poulhès, TSA 50032 Toulouse 31059 FranceDepartment of Cardiology Rangueil University Hospital 1 avenue Jean Poulhès, TSA 50032 Toulouse 31059 FranceDepartment of Cardiology Rangueil University Hospital 1 avenue Jean Poulhès, TSA 50032 Toulouse 31059 FranceDepartment of Cardiology Rangueil University Hospital 1 avenue Jean Poulhès, TSA 50032 Toulouse 31059 FranceAbstract Aims Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have reduced the mortality of patients with advanced heart failure both as bridge‐to‐transplant and as destination therapy. However, LVADs are associated with various complications, including bleedings, which affect the prognosis. The aim of the study was to explore the prevalence, management, and outcomes of haemorrhagic adverse events in LVAD recipients. Methods and results We conducted a retrospective, single‐centre, cohort study including all patients who received an LVAD from January 2008 to December 2019 in our tertiary centre (Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France). Bleeding events, death, and heart transplantation were collected from electronic medical files. Eighty‐eight patients were included, and 43 (49%) presented at least one bleeding event. Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding was the most frequent (n = 21, 24%), followed by epistaxis (n = 12, 14%) and intracranial haemorrhage (n = 9, 10%). Bleeding events were associated with increased mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 3.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5–9.3, P < 0.01], particularly in case of intracranial haemorrhage (HR 14.6, 95% CI 4.2–51.1, P < 0.0001). GI bleedings were associated with a trend towards increased mortality (HR 3.0, 95% CI 0.9–9.3, P = 0.05). Each bleeding episode multiplied the risk of death by 1.8 (95% CI 1.2–2.7, P < 0.01). Finally, only early bleedings (<9 months post‐implantation) had an impact on mortality (HR 4.2, 95% CI 1.6–11.1, P < 0.01). Therapeutic management was mainly based on temporary interruption of anticoagulation and permanent interruption of antiplatelet therapy. Invasive management was rarely performed. Conclusions Haemorrhagic events in LVAD recipients are frequent and associated with increased mortality. GI bleedings are the most frequent, and intracranial haemorrhages the most associated with mortality. Management remains empirical requiring more research.https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13899Left ventricular assist deviceBleedingHeart failureMortality
spellingShingle Laetitia Pourtau
Maxime Beneyto
Jean Porterie
Jerome Roncalli
Montse Massot
Caroline Biendel
Pauline Fournier
Romain Itier
Michel Galinier
Olivier Lairez
Clement Delmas
Prevalence, management, and outcomes of haemorrhagic events in left ventricular assist device recipients
ESC Heart Failure
Left ventricular assist device
Bleeding
Heart failure
Mortality
title Prevalence, management, and outcomes of haemorrhagic events in left ventricular assist device recipients
title_full Prevalence, management, and outcomes of haemorrhagic events in left ventricular assist device recipients
title_fullStr Prevalence, management, and outcomes of haemorrhagic events in left ventricular assist device recipients
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence, management, and outcomes of haemorrhagic events in left ventricular assist device recipients
title_short Prevalence, management, and outcomes of haemorrhagic events in left ventricular assist device recipients
title_sort prevalence management and outcomes of haemorrhagic events in left ventricular assist device recipients
topic Left ventricular assist device
Bleeding
Heart failure
Mortality
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13899
work_keys_str_mv AT laetitiapourtau prevalencemanagementandoutcomesofhaemorrhagiceventsinleftventricularassistdevicerecipients
AT maximebeneyto prevalencemanagementandoutcomesofhaemorrhagiceventsinleftventricularassistdevicerecipients
AT jeanporterie prevalencemanagementandoutcomesofhaemorrhagiceventsinleftventricularassistdevicerecipients
AT jeromeroncalli prevalencemanagementandoutcomesofhaemorrhagiceventsinleftventricularassistdevicerecipients
AT montsemassot prevalencemanagementandoutcomesofhaemorrhagiceventsinleftventricularassistdevicerecipients
AT carolinebiendel prevalencemanagementandoutcomesofhaemorrhagiceventsinleftventricularassistdevicerecipients
AT paulinefournier prevalencemanagementandoutcomesofhaemorrhagiceventsinleftventricularassistdevicerecipients
AT romainitier prevalencemanagementandoutcomesofhaemorrhagiceventsinleftventricularassistdevicerecipients
AT michelgalinier prevalencemanagementandoutcomesofhaemorrhagiceventsinleftventricularassistdevicerecipients
AT olivierlairez prevalencemanagementandoutcomesofhaemorrhagiceventsinleftventricularassistdevicerecipients
AT clementdelmas prevalencemanagementandoutcomesofhaemorrhagiceventsinleftventricularassistdevicerecipients