Combination of Conditioning Factors for Generation of Landslide Susceptibility Maps by Extreme Gradient Boosting in Cuenca, Ecuador
Landslides are hazardous events that occur mainly in mountainous areas and cause substantial losses of various kinds worldwide; therefore, it is important to investigate them. In this study, a specific Machine Learning (ML) method was further analyzed due to the good results obtained in the previous...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | Algorithms |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4893/18/5/258 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Landslides are hazardous events that occur mainly in mountainous areas and cause substantial losses of various kinds worldwide; therefore, it is important to investigate them. In this study, a specific Machine Learning (ML) method was further analyzed due to the good results obtained in the previous stage of this research. The algorithm implemented is Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), which was used to evaluate the susceptibility to landslides recorded in the city of Cuenca (Ecuador) and its surroundings, generating the respective Landslide Susceptibility Maps (LSM). For the model implementation, a landslide inventory updated to 2019 was used and several sets from 15 available conditioning factors were considered, applying two different methods of random point sampling. Additionally, a hyperparameter tuning process of XGBoost has been employed in order to optimize the predictive and computational performance of each model. The results obtained were validated using AUC-ROC, F-Score and the degree of landslide coincidence adjustment at high and very high susceptibility levels, showing a good predictive capacity in most cases. The best results were obtained with the set of the six best conditioning factors previously determined, as it produced good values in validation metrics (AUC = 0.83; F-Score = 0.73) and a degree of coincidence of landslides in the high and very high susceptibility levels above 90%. The Wilcoxon text led to establishing significant differences between methods. These results show the need to perform susceptibility analyses with different data sets to determine the most appropriate ones. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1999-4893 |