Prognostic Significance of Visit-to-Visit Ultrafiltration Volume Variability in Hemodialysis Patients

<b>Introduction:</b> Patients on chronic hemodialysis (HD) have significantly higher mortality compared with the general population. Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the primary reason for death in these patients. Suboptimal extracellular fluid management increases the CV risk of HD patien...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Balázs Sági, Tibor Vas, Éva Fejes, Botond Csiky
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-03-01
Series:Biomedicines
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/13/3/717
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850204918769516544
author Balázs Sági
Tibor Vas
Éva Fejes
Botond Csiky
author_facet Balázs Sági
Tibor Vas
Éva Fejes
Botond Csiky
author_sort Balázs Sági
collection DOAJ
description <b>Introduction:</b> Patients on chronic hemodialysis (HD) have significantly higher mortality compared with the general population. Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the primary reason for death in these patients. Suboptimal extracellular fluid management increases the CV risk of HD patients. We aimed to study the effect of visit-to-visit ultrafiltration volume (UV) variability on CV events and mortality in chronic HD patients. <b>Patients and Methods:</b> In our study, 173 chronic HD patients were included (median age: 63 ± 13 years; 53% men). Ultrafiltration volume (UV) variability was analyzed retrospectively for 24 months. The standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated using the indices of UV variability. CV is the SD divided by the mean. The obtained parameters were SD and CV of the UV: UVSD and UVCV. UV data during the observation period were recorded and used to calculate UV variability. Routine transthoracal echocardiography was performed. <b>Results:</b> Patients were divided into groups based on the median of UVSD, low-UVSD (<568 mL) and high-UVSD (≥568 mL) group; and also based on the median of UVCV, low- (<0.29) and high-UVCV (≥0.29) group. All-cause mortality was significantly higher in the high compared to the low-UVSD (21/84 vs. 9/89; <i>p</i> < 0.001) group. Similarly, mortality was higher in the high-UVCV group compared to the low-UVCV group (18/78 vs. 12/95; <i>p</i> = 0.005) after 24 months. Major adverse CV event (MACE) rates were also significantly higher in the high- compared to the low-UVSD group (20/84 vs. 8/89; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Similarly, the MACE rate was significantly higher in the high-UVCV group compared to the low-UVCV group (15/78 vs. 13/95; <i>p</i> = 0.029) after 24 months. There was no significant difference between the groups in CV mortality. UVSD correlated with parathormone (PTH) level (r = 0.416; <i>p</i> = 0.015), and UVCV with total cholesterol (r = 0.419; <i>p</i> = 0.015). Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) and end-systolic diameter (LVESD) were higher in the high-UVCV group compared to the low-UVCV group (49.95 vs. 52.08; <i>p</i> = 0.013 and 32.19 vs. 34.13; <i>p</i> = 0.034). <b>Conclusions:</b> According to our results, high UVSD and UVCD are associated with increased all-cause mortality and MACE rates but not CV mortality in chronic HD patients. Cardiovascular changes caused by increased UF volume variability during HD may contribute to higher CV morbidity and mortality in these patients.
format Article
id doaj-art-050a3fb1d15249cd90e9bae2dc886787
institution OA Journals
issn 2227-9059
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Biomedicines
spelling doaj-art-050a3fb1d15249cd90e9bae2dc8867872025-08-20T02:11:12ZengMDPI AGBiomedicines2227-90592025-03-0113371710.3390/biomedicines13030717Prognostic Significance of Visit-to-Visit Ultrafiltration Volume Variability in Hemodialysis PatientsBalázs Sági0Tibor Vas1Éva Fejes2Botond Csiky3Nephrology and Diabetes Center, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Clinical Center, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, HungaryNephrology and Diabetes Center, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Clinical Center, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, HungaryHospital of Komló, Clinical Center, University of Pécs, 7623 Pécs, HungaryNephrology and Diabetes Center, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Clinical Center, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary<b>Introduction:</b> Patients on chronic hemodialysis (HD) have significantly higher mortality compared with the general population. Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the primary reason for death in these patients. Suboptimal extracellular fluid management increases the CV risk of HD patients. We aimed to study the effect of visit-to-visit ultrafiltration volume (UV) variability on CV events and mortality in chronic HD patients. <b>Patients and Methods:</b> In our study, 173 chronic HD patients were included (median age: 63 ± 13 years; 53% men). Ultrafiltration volume (UV) variability was analyzed retrospectively for 24 months. The standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated using the indices of UV variability. CV is the SD divided by the mean. The obtained parameters were SD and CV of the UV: UVSD and UVCV. UV data during the observation period were recorded and used to calculate UV variability. Routine transthoracal echocardiography was performed. <b>Results:</b> Patients were divided into groups based on the median of UVSD, low-UVSD (<568 mL) and high-UVSD (≥568 mL) group; and also based on the median of UVCV, low- (<0.29) and high-UVCV (≥0.29) group. All-cause mortality was significantly higher in the high compared to the low-UVSD (21/84 vs. 9/89; <i>p</i> < 0.001) group. Similarly, mortality was higher in the high-UVCV group compared to the low-UVCV group (18/78 vs. 12/95; <i>p</i> = 0.005) after 24 months. Major adverse CV event (MACE) rates were also significantly higher in the high- compared to the low-UVSD group (20/84 vs. 8/89; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Similarly, the MACE rate was significantly higher in the high-UVCV group compared to the low-UVCV group (15/78 vs. 13/95; <i>p</i> = 0.029) after 24 months. There was no significant difference between the groups in CV mortality. UVSD correlated with parathormone (PTH) level (r = 0.416; <i>p</i> = 0.015), and UVCV with total cholesterol (r = 0.419; <i>p</i> = 0.015). Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) and end-systolic diameter (LVESD) were higher in the high-UVCV group compared to the low-UVCV group (49.95 vs. 52.08; <i>p</i> = 0.013 and 32.19 vs. 34.13; <i>p</i> = 0.034). <b>Conclusions:</b> According to our results, high UVSD and UVCD are associated with increased all-cause mortality and MACE rates but not CV mortality in chronic HD patients. Cardiovascular changes caused by increased UF volume variability during HD may contribute to higher CV morbidity and mortality in these patients.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/13/3/717end-stage kidney diseasehemodialysisultrafiltration volume variabilitysurvivalMACEechocardiography
spellingShingle Balázs Sági
Tibor Vas
Éva Fejes
Botond Csiky
Prognostic Significance of Visit-to-Visit Ultrafiltration Volume Variability in Hemodialysis Patients
Biomedicines
end-stage kidney disease
hemodialysis
ultrafiltration volume variability
survival
MACE
echocardiography
title Prognostic Significance of Visit-to-Visit Ultrafiltration Volume Variability in Hemodialysis Patients
title_full Prognostic Significance of Visit-to-Visit Ultrafiltration Volume Variability in Hemodialysis Patients
title_fullStr Prognostic Significance of Visit-to-Visit Ultrafiltration Volume Variability in Hemodialysis Patients
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Significance of Visit-to-Visit Ultrafiltration Volume Variability in Hemodialysis Patients
title_short Prognostic Significance of Visit-to-Visit Ultrafiltration Volume Variability in Hemodialysis Patients
title_sort prognostic significance of visit to visit ultrafiltration volume variability in hemodialysis patients
topic end-stage kidney disease
hemodialysis
ultrafiltration volume variability
survival
MACE
echocardiography
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/13/3/717
work_keys_str_mv AT balazssagi prognosticsignificanceofvisittovisitultrafiltrationvolumevariabilityinhemodialysispatients
AT tiborvas prognosticsignificanceofvisittovisitultrafiltrationvolumevariabilityinhemodialysispatients
AT evafejes prognosticsignificanceofvisittovisitultrafiltrationvolumevariabilityinhemodialysispatients
AT botondcsiky prognosticsignificanceofvisittovisitultrafiltrationvolumevariabilityinhemodialysispatients