Comparison of botanical characters and physiological characteristics among different flue-cured tobacco genotypes in seedling transplanting period

Guizhou is the second largest province for tobacco production and acts as a typical moderate-flavor tobacco planting area in China. According to the data from Guizhou Province Tobacco Monopoly Bureau (Company), the planting area of characteristic tobacco varieties bred in Guizhou such as “Nanjiang 3...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wu Shengjiang, Dian Ruili, Wei Kesu, Li Delun, Han Zhikang, Lin Yechun, Pan Wenjie, Xie Yishu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Zhejiang University Press 2014-09-01
Series:浙江大学学报. 农业与生命科学版
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.academax.com/doi/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2013.09.121
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849706426180567040
author Wu Shengjiang
Dian Ruili
Wei Kesu
Li Delun
Han Zhikang
Lin Yechun
Pan Wenjie
Xie Yishu
author_facet Wu Shengjiang
Dian Ruili
Wei Kesu
Li Delun
Han Zhikang
Lin Yechun
Pan Wenjie
Xie Yishu
author_sort Wu Shengjiang
collection DOAJ
description Guizhou is the second largest province for tobacco production and acts as a typical moderate-flavor tobacco planting area in China. According to the data from Guizhou Province Tobacco Monopoly Bureau (Company), the planting area of characteristic tobacco varieties bred in Guizhou such as “Nanjiang 3” “Bina 1”, etc. has increased significantly in these years, and accounted for more than 50% of the total tobacco growing area in Guizhou since 2012. Meanwhile, the well-cellar style transplanting technology invented in Guizhou has spread throughout our country, but there is a very common problem during the tobacco production that the transplanted seedlings showed a lower quality. Therefore, it is important and necessary to study the quality of different flue-cured tobacco genotypes, in order to cultivate high-quality seedlings and highlight the features of flue-cured tobacco varieties bred in Guizhou.In order to further improve the quality of seedling used for the well-cellar style transplanting in Guizhou, the biomass, root morphology, plastid pigments content, electrical conductivity, pH value and photosynthetic characteristics of different flue-cured tobacco genotypes (i. e., “K326”“Nanjiang 3”“Bina 1”“Guiyan 2” “Jiucaiping 2”) were studied in seedling transplanting period.The results showed that the botanical characters of different flue-cured tobacco genotypes in seedling transplanting period were significantly different.“K326” had the best aboveground biomass (0.110 9 gram per plant) while “Guiyan 2” had the lowest aboveground biomass (0.092 5 gram per plant). As for root, “Guiyan 2” and “Bina 1” had a better root morphology, and their root dry mass were 0.042 4 gram per plant and 0.040 3 gram per plant, respectively. For the total biomass, “K326” and “Bina 1” had the largest dry mass, and their values were 0.149 3 gram per plant and 0.135 4 gram per plant, respectively. Physiological analysis illustrated that the difference in plastid pigments content and pH value was relatively small among different flue-cured tobacco genotypes in seedling transplanting period, but the difference in electrical conductivity values and photosynthetic characteristics indexes was quite significant.“Bina 1” had the highest plastid pigments content, containing 2.019 mg/g chlorophyll and 0.538 mg/g carotenoid, followed by “K326”, while “Jiucaiping 2” had the lowest plastid pigments content, containing 1.542 mg/g chlorophyll and 0.435 mg/g carotenoid. The pH values of “K326” (6.63) and “Bina 1” (6.76) were in the middle, and “Jiucaiping 2” (6.88) and “Nanjiang 3” (6.83) had the largest pH value, while “Guiyan 2” (6.43) was the smallest. The electrical conductivity values of “K326” and “Bina 1” were the smallest, while “Guiyan 2” had the largest electrical conductivity value. The absolute conductivity values of “K326” and “Bina 1” were 9.85 μS/cm and 9.08 μS/cm, and relative conductivity values were 15.63% and 21.45%, respectively. The absolute conductivity and relative conductivity values of “Guiyan 2” were 13.28 μS/cm and 29.84%, respectively. As far as the photosynthetic indexes, “K326” had the best performance among all the tested genotypes, followed by “Bina 1” and “Jiucaiping 2”, while “Guiyan 2” and “Nanjiang 3” were relatively poor.In summary, “Bina 1” and “K326” had better botanical characters and physiological characteristics among the different flue-cured tobacco genotypes tested in this study, showing better photosynthetic performance, stronger resistance and self-protective ability. Therefore, “Bina 1” and “K326” can be used as the main flue-cured tobacco varieties in Guizhou in the future.
format Article
id doaj-art-0501a4011bd54b6c93d3a3da0f3799e7
institution DOAJ
issn 1008-9209
2097-5155
language English
publishDate 2014-09-01
publisher Zhejiang University Press
record_format Article
series 浙江大学学报. 农业与生命科学版
spelling doaj-art-0501a4011bd54b6c93d3a3da0f3799e72025-08-20T03:16:12ZengZhejiang University Press浙江大学学报. 农业与生命科学版1008-92092097-51552014-09-014051151810.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2013.09.12110089209Comparison of botanical characters and physiological characteristics among different flue-cured tobacco genotypes in seedling transplanting periodWu ShengjiangDian RuiliWei KesuLi DelunHan ZhikangLin YechunPan WenjieXie YishuGuizhou is the second largest province for tobacco production and acts as a typical moderate-flavor tobacco planting area in China. According to the data from Guizhou Province Tobacco Monopoly Bureau (Company), the planting area of characteristic tobacco varieties bred in Guizhou such as “Nanjiang 3” “Bina 1”, etc. has increased significantly in these years, and accounted for more than 50% of the total tobacco growing area in Guizhou since 2012. Meanwhile, the well-cellar style transplanting technology invented in Guizhou has spread throughout our country, but there is a very common problem during the tobacco production that the transplanted seedlings showed a lower quality. Therefore, it is important and necessary to study the quality of different flue-cured tobacco genotypes, in order to cultivate high-quality seedlings and highlight the features of flue-cured tobacco varieties bred in Guizhou.In order to further improve the quality of seedling used for the well-cellar style transplanting in Guizhou, the biomass, root morphology, plastid pigments content, electrical conductivity, pH value and photosynthetic characteristics of different flue-cured tobacco genotypes (i. e., “K326”“Nanjiang 3”“Bina 1”“Guiyan 2” “Jiucaiping 2”) were studied in seedling transplanting period.The results showed that the botanical characters of different flue-cured tobacco genotypes in seedling transplanting period were significantly different.“K326” had the best aboveground biomass (0.110 9 gram per plant) while “Guiyan 2” had the lowest aboveground biomass (0.092 5 gram per plant). As for root, “Guiyan 2” and “Bina 1” had a better root morphology, and their root dry mass were 0.042 4 gram per plant and 0.040 3 gram per plant, respectively. For the total biomass, “K326” and “Bina 1” had the largest dry mass, and their values were 0.149 3 gram per plant and 0.135 4 gram per plant, respectively. Physiological analysis illustrated that the difference in plastid pigments content and pH value was relatively small among different flue-cured tobacco genotypes in seedling transplanting period, but the difference in electrical conductivity values and photosynthetic characteristics indexes was quite significant.“Bina 1” had the highest plastid pigments content, containing 2.019 mg/g chlorophyll and 0.538 mg/g carotenoid, followed by “K326”, while “Jiucaiping 2” had the lowest plastid pigments content, containing 1.542 mg/g chlorophyll and 0.435 mg/g carotenoid. The pH values of “K326” (6.63) and “Bina 1” (6.76) were in the middle, and “Jiucaiping 2” (6.88) and “Nanjiang 3” (6.83) had the largest pH value, while “Guiyan 2” (6.43) was the smallest. The electrical conductivity values of “K326” and “Bina 1” were the smallest, while “Guiyan 2” had the largest electrical conductivity value. The absolute conductivity values of “K326” and “Bina 1” were 9.85 μS/cm and 9.08 μS/cm, and relative conductivity values were 15.63% and 21.45%, respectively. The absolute conductivity and relative conductivity values of “Guiyan 2” were 13.28 μS/cm and 29.84%, respectively. As far as the photosynthetic indexes, “K326” had the best performance among all the tested genotypes, followed by “Bina 1” and “Jiucaiping 2”, while “Guiyan 2” and “Nanjiang 3” were relatively poor.In summary, “Bina 1” and “K326” had better botanical characters and physiological characteristics among the different flue-cured tobacco genotypes tested in this study, showing better photosynthetic performance, stronger resistance and self-protective ability. Therefore, “Bina 1” and “K326” can be used as the main flue-cured tobacco varieties in Guizhou in the future.https://www.academax.com/doi/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2013.09.121flue-cured tobaccogenotypestobacco seedlingbotanical charactersroot morphologyphysiological characteristics
spellingShingle Wu Shengjiang
Dian Ruili
Wei Kesu
Li Delun
Han Zhikang
Lin Yechun
Pan Wenjie
Xie Yishu
Comparison of botanical characters and physiological characteristics among different flue-cured tobacco genotypes in seedling transplanting period
浙江大学学报. 农业与生命科学版
flue-cured tobacco
genotypes
tobacco seedling
botanical characters
root morphology
physiological characteristics
title Comparison of botanical characters and physiological characteristics among different flue-cured tobacco genotypes in seedling transplanting period
title_full Comparison of botanical characters and physiological characteristics among different flue-cured tobacco genotypes in seedling transplanting period
title_fullStr Comparison of botanical characters and physiological characteristics among different flue-cured tobacco genotypes in seedling transplanting period
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of botanical characters and physiological characteristics among different flue-cured tobacco genotypes in seedling transplanting period
title_short Comparison of botanical characters and physiological characteristics among different flue-cured tobacco genotypes in seedling transplanting period
title_sort comparison of botanical characters and physiological characteristics among different flue cured tobacco genotypes in seedling transplanting period
topic flue-cured tobacco
genotypes
tobacco seedling
botanical characters
root morphology
physiological characteristics
url https://www.academax.com/doi/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2013.09.121
work_keys_str_mv AT wushengjiang comparisonofbotanicalcharactersandphysiologicalcharacteristicsamongdifferentfluecuredtobaccogenotypesinseedlingtransplantingperiod
AT dianruili comparisonofbotanicalcharactersandphysiologicalcharacteristicsamongdifferentfluecuredtobaccogenotypesinseedlingtransplantingperiod
AT weikesu comparisonofbotanicalcharactersandphysiologicalcharacteristicsamongdifferentfluecuredtobaccogenotypesinseedlingtransplantingperiod
AT lidelun comparisonofbotanicalcharactersandphysiologicalcharacteristicsamongdifferentfluecuredtobaccogenotypesinseedlingtransplantingperiod
AT hanzhikang comparisonofbotanicalcharactersandphysiologicalcharacteristicsamongdifferentfluecuredtobaccogenotypesinseedlingtransplantingperiod
AT linyechun comparisonofbotanicalcharactersandphysiologicalcharacteristicsamongdifferentfluecuredtobaccogenotypesinseedlingtransplantingperiod
AT panwenjie comparisonofbotanicalcharactersandphysiologicalcharacteristicsamongdifferentfluecuredtobaccogenotypesinseedlingtransplantingperiod
AT xieyishu comparisonofbotanicalcharactersandphysiologicalcharacteristicsamongdifferentfluecuredtobaccogenotypesinseedlingtransplantingperiod