Modelling the liver’s regenerative capacity across different clinical conditions

Background & Aims: Liver regeneration is essential for recovery following injury, but this process can be impaired by factors such as sex, age, metabolic disorders, fibrosis, and immunosuppressive therapies. We aimed to identify key transcriptomic, proteomic, and serum biomarkers of regenera...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anh Thu Nguyen-Lefebvre, Soumita Ghosh, Cristina Baciu, Bima J. Hasjim, Sara Naimimohasses, Graziano Oldani, Elisa Pasini, Michael Brudno, Nazia Selzner, Jeffrey Wrana, Mamatha Bhat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-08-01
Series:JHEP Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589555925001430
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849317409810284544
author Anh Thu Nguyen-Lefebvre
Soumita Ghosh
Cristina Baciu
Bima J. Hasjim
Sara Naimimohasses
Graziano Oldani
Elisa Pasini
Michael Brudno
Nazia Selzner
Jeffrey Wrana
Mamatha Bhat
author_facet Anh Thu Nguyen-Lefebvre
Soumita Ghosh
Cristina Baciu
Bima J. Hasjim
Sara Naimimohasses
Graziano Oldani
Elisa Pasini
Michael Brudno
Nazia Selzner
Jeffrey Wrana
Mamatha Bhat
author_sort Anh Thu Nguyen-Lefebvre
collection DOAJ
description Background &amp; Aims: Liver regeneration is essential for recovery following injury, but this process can be impaired by factors such as sex, age, metabolic disorders, fibrosis, and immunosuppressive therapies. We aimed to identify key transcriptomic, proteomic, and serum biomarkers of regeneration in mouse models under these diverse conditions using systems biology and machine learning approaches. Methods: Six mouse models, each undergoing 75% hepatectomy, were used to study regeneration across distinct clinical contexts: young males and females, aged mice, stage 2 fibrosis, steatosis, and tacrolimus exposure. A novel contrastive deep learning framework with triplet loss was developed to map regenerative trajectories and identify genes associated with regenerative efficiency. Results: Despite achieving ≥75% liver mass restoration by day 7, regeneration was significantly delayed in aged, steatotic, and fibrotic models, as indicated by reduced Ki-67 staining on day 2 (p <0.0001 for all). Interestingly, fibrotic livers exhibited reduced collagen deposition and partial regression to stage 1 fibrosis post-hepatectomy. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses revealed consistent downregulation of cell cycle genes in impaired regeneration. The deep learning model integrating clinical and transcriptomic data predicted regenerative outcomes with 87.9% accuracy. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) highlighted six key predictive genes: Wee1, Rbl1, Gnl3, Mdm2, Cdk2, and Ccne2. Proteomic validation and human SPLiT-seq (split-pool ligation-based transcriptome sequencing) data further supported their relevance across species. Conclusions: This study identifies conserved cell cycle regulators underlying efficient liver regeneration and provides a predictive framework for evaluating regenerative capacity. The integration of deep learning and multi-omics profiling provides a promising approach to better understand liver regeneration and may help guide therapeutic strategies, especially in complex clinical settings. Impact and implications: The aim of this study was to identify key transcriptomic, proteomic, and serum biomarkers of regeneration in mouse models under diverse conditions, using systems biology and machine learning approaches. Key molecular drivers of liver regeneration across diverse clinical conditions were identified using innovative deep learning and multi-omics approaches. By identifying conserved cell cycle genes predictive of regenerative outcomes, this study offers a powerful framework to assess and potentially enhance liver recovery in older patients, those with fibrosis or steatosis, and/or those under immunosuppression.
format Article
id doaj-art-04fb6868774c49dd9a66d0efff7b5dfa
institution Kabale University
issn 2589-5559
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series JHEP Reports
spelling doaj-art-04fb6868774c49dd9a66d0efff7b5dfa2025-08-20T03:51:13ZengElsevierJHEP Reports2589-55592025-08-017810146510.1016/j.jhepr.2025.101465Modelling the liver’s regenerative capacity across different clinical conditionsAnh Thu Nguyen-Lefebvre0Soumita Ghosh1Cristina Baciu2Bima J. Hasjim3Sara Naimimohasses4Graziano Oldani5Elisa Pasini6Michael Brudno7Nazia Selzner8Jeffrey Wrana9Mamatha Bhat10Ajmera Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaAjmera Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, CanadaAjmera Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaDepartment of Surgery, University of California - Irvine, Orange, California, USA; Transplant AI Initiative, Ajmera Transplant Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Ontario, CanadaAjmera Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaDepartment of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Canada; Division of Abdominal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, SwitzerlandAjmera Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Ontario, CanadaAjmera Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Ontario, CanadaAjmera Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Corresponding author. Address: MaRS 9-9955, 585 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2N2, Canada; Tel.: +1 416-581-7512.Background &amp; Aims: Liver regeneration is essential for recovery following injury, but this process can be impaired by factors such as sex, age, metabolic disorders, fibrosis, and immunosuppressive therapies. We aimed to identify key transcriptomic, proteomic, and serum biomarkers of regeneration in mouse models under these diverse conditions using systems biology and machine learning approaches. Methods: Six mouse models, each undergoing 75% hepatectomy, were used to study regeneration across distinct clinical contexts: young males and females, aged mice, stage 2 fibrosis, steatosis, and tacrolimus exposure. A novel contrastive deep learning framework with triplet loss was developed to map regenerative trajectories and identify genes associated with regenerative efficiency. Results: Despite achieving ≥75% liver mass restoration by day 7, regeneration was significantly delayed in aged, steatotic, and fibrotic models, as indicated by reduced Ki-67 staining on day 2 (p <0.0001 for all). Interestingly, fibrotic livers exhibited reduced collagen deposition and partial regression to stage 1 fibrosis post-hepatectomy. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses revealed consistent downregulation of cell cycle genes in impaired regeneration. The deep learning model integrating clinical and transcriptomic data predicted regenerative outcomes with 87.9% accuracy. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) highlighted six key predictive genes: Wee1, Rbl1, Gnl3, Mdm2, Cdk2, and Ccne2. Proteomic validation and human SPLiT-seq (split-pool ligation-based transcriptome sequencing) data further supported their relevance across species. Conclusions: This study identifies conserved cell cycle regulators underlying efficient liver regeneration and provides a predictive framework for evaluating regenerative capacity. The integration of deep learning and multi-omics profiling provides a promising approach to better understand liver regeneration and may help guide therapeutic strategies, especially in complex clinical settings. Impact and implications: The aim of this study was to identify key transcriptomic, proteomic, and serum biomarkers of regeneration in mouse models under diverse conditions, using systems biology and machine learning approaches. Key molecular drivers of liver regeneration across diverse clinical conditions were identified using innovative deep learning and multi-omics approaches. By identifying conserved cell cycle genes predictive of regenerative outcomes, this study offers a powerful framework to assess and potentially enhance liver recovery in older patients, those with fibrosis or steatosis, and/or those under immunosuppression.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589555925001430Liver regenerationpartial hepatectomydeep learningtranscriptome analysisproteome analysis
spellingShingle Anh Thu Nguyen-Lefebvre
Soumita Ghosh
Cristina Baciu
Bima J. Hasjim
Sara Naimimohasses
Graziano Oldani
Elisa Pasini
Michael Brudno
Nazia Selzner
Jeffrey Wrana
Mamatha Bhat
Modelling the liver’s regenerative capacity across different clinical conditions
JHEP Reports
Liver regeneration
partial hepatectomy
deep learning
transcriptome analysis
proteome analysis
title Modelling the liver’s regenerative capacity across different clinical conditions
title_full Modelling the liver’s regenerative capacity across different clinical conditions
title_fullStr Modelling the liver’s regenerative capacity across different clinical conditions
title_full_unstemmed Modelling the liver’s regenerative capacity across different clinical conditions
title_short Modelling the liver’s regenerative capacity across different clinical conditions
title_sort modelling the liver s regenerative capacity across different clinical conditions
topic Liver regeneration
partial hepatectomy
deep learning
transcriptome analysis
proteome analysis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589555925001430
work_keys_str_mv AT anhthunguyenlefebvre modellingtheliversregenerativecapacityacrossdifferentclinicalconditions
AT soumitaghosh modellingtheliversregenerativecapacityacrossdifferentclinicalconditions
AT cristinabaciu modellingtheliversregenerativecapacityacrossdifferentclinicalconditions
AT bimajhasjim modellingtheliversregenerativecapacityacrossdifferentclinicalconditions
AT saranaimimohasses modellingtheliversregenerativecapacityacrossdifferentclinicalconditions
AT grazianooldani modellingtheliversregenerativecapacityacrossdifferentclinicalconditions
AT elisapasini modellingtheliversregenerativecapacityacrossdifferentclinicalconditions
AT michaelbrudno modellingtheliversregenerativecapacityacrossdifferentclinicalconditions
AT naziaselzner modellingtheliversregenerativecapacityacrossdifferentclinicalconditions
AT jeffreywrana modellingtheliversregenerativecapacityacrossdifferentclinicalconditions
AT mamathabhat modellingtheliversregenerativecapacityacrossdifferentclinicalconditions