Může soud dotvořením práva pomoci zaměstnanci se zdravotním postižením?
In this paper I attempt to examine the question of whether the court can aid an employee with a disability through judicial law-making. I do so by analysing the Supreme Court’s decision 21 Cdo 1276/2016. I will try to demonstrate, that it did not in my opinion consider and reflect the EU and interna...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | ces |
| Published: |
Karolinum Press
2025-03-01
|
| Series: | Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Iuridica |
| Online Access: | http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/23366478.2025.12 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850181699161292800 |
|---|---|
| author | Nicolas Ölveczky |
| author_facet | Nicolas Ölveczky |
| author_sort | Nicolas Ölveczky |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In this paper I attempt to examine the question of whether the court can aid an employee with a disability through judicial law-making. I do so by analysing the Supreme Court’s decision 21 Cdo 1276/2016. I will try to demonstrate, that it did not in my opinion consider and reflect the EU and international approach to the integration of employees with disabilities into the workforce with a sufficient degree of intensity. I introduce these approaches, and I try to showcase their possible relevance to Czech case law. I overall try to assess the decision in terms of the (in)admissibility of its judicial law-making. This means that I am attempting to determine whether the court has impermissibly encroached (by the way it interprets the law) upon the legislative authority of parliament. I firstly address the issue of judicial law-making itself theoretically and then through case law. In the case law section, I outline a “methodology”, describing a procedure a court should follow when wanting to engage in judicial law-making. I then analyse the case 21 Cdo 1276/2016 through the lens of the theoretical setting, “methodology”, and knowledge of the EU and international approach. I point out its legal framework, present its two legal conclusions, and I attempt to evaluate them in terms of their conformity with the approaches, and their (in)admissibility respectively. I affirmatively answer the question posed in the title in this part of the text in the context of a specific labor law case. I then outline the abstract implications derivable from such an analysis in the conclusion. There I provide a positive answer to the question posed in the title in a general way. Finally, I note the non-exhaustive, practicality, topicality, and interdisciplinary applicability of the topic of judicial law-making as a whole. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-04e8d4e24bd141b6bf02e6a5c3f839bc |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 0323-0619 2336-6478 |
| language | ces |
| publishDate | 2025-03-01 |
| publisher | Karolinum Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Iuridica |
| spelling | doaj-art-04e8d4e24bd141b6bf02e6a5c3f839bc2025-08-20T02:17:50ZcesKarolinum PressActa Universitatis Carolinae. Iuridica0323-06192336-64782025-03-0171121323410.14712/23366478.2025.12Může soud dotvořením práva pomoci zaměstnanci se zdravotním postižením?Nicolas ÖlveczkyIn this paper I attempt to examine the question of whether the court can aid an employee with a disability through judicial law-making. I do so by analysing the Supreme Court’s decision 21 Cdo 1276/2016. I will try to demonstrate, that it did not in my opinion consider and reflect the EU and international approach to the integration of employees with disabilities into the workforce with a sufficient degree of intensity. I introduce these approaches, and I try to showcase their possible relevance to Czech case law. I overall try to assess the decision in terms of the (in)admissibility of its judicial law-making. This means that I am attempting to determine whether the court has impermissibly encroached (by the way it interprets the law) upon the legislative authority of parliament. I firstly address the issue of judicial law-making itself theoretically and then through case law. In the case law section, I outline a “methodology”, describing a procedure a court should follow when wanting to engage in judicial law-making. I then analyse the case 21 Cdo 1276/2016 through the lens of the theoretical setting, “methodology”, and knowledge of the EU and international approach. I point out its legal framework, present its two legal conclusions, and I attempt to evaluate them in terms of their conformity with the approaches, and their (in)admissibility respectively. I affirmatively answer the question posed in the title in this part of the text in the context of a specific labor law case. I then outline the abstract implications derivable from such an analysis in the conclusion. There I provide a positive answer to the question posed in the title in a general way. Finally, I note the non-exhaustive, practicality, topicality, and interdisciplinary applicability of the topic of judicial law-making as a whole.http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/23366478.2025.12 |
| spellingShingle | Nicolas Ölveczky Může soud dotvořením práva pomoci zaměstnanci se zdravotním postižením? Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Iuridica |
| title | Může soud dotvořením práva pomoci zaměstnanci se zdravotním postižením? |
| title_full | Může soud dotvořením práva pomoci zaměstnanci se zdravotním postižením? |
| title_fullStr | Může soud dotvořením práva pomoci zaměstnanci se zdravotním postižením? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Může soud dotvořením práva pomoci zaměstnanci se zdravotním postižením? |
| title_short | Může soud dotvořením práva pomoci zaměstnanci se zdravotním postižením? |
| title_sort | muze soud dotvorenim prava pomoci zamestnanci se zdravotnim postizenim |
| url | http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/23366478.2025.12 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nicolasolveczky muzesouddotvorenimpravapomocizamestnancisezdravotnimpostizenim |