Stress dose explains drought recovery in Norway spruce

IntroductionUnderstanding the stress recovery of trees, particularly with respect to increasing droughts due to climate change, is crucial. An often-overlooked aspect is how short versus long drought events of high intensity (i.e., low and high stress dose) result in stress damage and affect post-st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Timo Knüver, Andreas Bär, Elias Hamann, Marcus Zuber, Stefan Mayr, Barbara Beikircher, Nadine K. Ruehr
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Plant Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1542301/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849773324050104320
author Timo Knüver
Timo Knüver
Andreas Bär
Elias Hamann
Marcus Zuber
Stefan Mayr
Barbara Beikircher
Nadine K. Ruehr
author_facet Timo Knüver
Timo Knüver
Andreas Bär
Elias Hamann
Marcus Zuber
Stefan Mayr
Barbara Beikircher
Nadine K. Ruehr
author_sort Timo Knüver
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionUnderstanding the stress recovery of trees, particularly with respect to increasing droughts due to climate change, is crucial. An often-overlooked aspect is how short versus long drought events of high intensity (i.e., low and high stress dose) result in stress damage and affect post-stress recovery.MethodsThis study examines the stress and recovery dynamics of 3-year-old Picea abies following a short drought (n = 5) of 18 days or a long drought (n = 9) of 51 days during late summer. We particularly assessed how the recovery of canopy conductance and tree transpiration is linked to i) stress intensity in terms of minimum water potential, ii) stress duration inferred by days below a water potential related to 12% hydraulic conductance loss (dP12), iii) stress dose inferred by the cumulative tree water deficit on days below P12 (TWDP12) as well as the cumulative water potential (Ψcum), and iv) the percent loss of conductive xylem area (PLA).ResultsBoth drought treatments resulted in stem and root embolism with a higher PLA of 49% ± 10% in the long drought treatment compared to 18% ± 6% in the short drought treatment consistent across the measured plant parts. Suffering from embolism and leaf shedding (long drought, 32%; short drought, 12%), canopy conductance in the long drought treatment recovered to 41% ± 3% of the control and in the short drought treatment to 66% ± 4% at 12 days after drought release. These recovery rates were well explained by the observed PLA (R2 = 0.66) and the dP12 (R2 = 0.62) but best explained by stress dose metrics, particularly the cumulative TWDP12 (R2 = 0.88).DiscussionOur study highlights that stress duration and intensity should be integrated to assess post-stress recovery rates. Here, the tree water deficit derived from point dendrometers appears promising, as it provides a non-destructive and high temporal resolution of the stress dose.
format Article
id doaj-art-04c9fc415cf24bdc82957ab25c209d3d
institution DOAJ
issn 1664-462X
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Plant Science
spelling doaj-art-04c9fc415cf24bdc82957ab25c209d3d2025-08-20T03:02:06ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Plant Science1664-462X2025-03-011610.3389/fpls.2025.15423011542301Stress dose explains drought recovery in Norway spruceTimo Knüver0Timo Knüver1Andreas Bär2Elias Hamann3Marcus Zuber4Stefan Mayr5Barbara Beikircher6Nadine K. Ruehr7Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research-Atmospheric Environmental Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, GermanyDepartment of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaInstitute for Photon Science and Synchrotron Radiation, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, GermanyInstitute for Photon Science and Synchrotron Radiation, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, GermanyDepartment of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaInstitute of Meteorology and Climate Research-Atmospheric Environmental Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, GermanyIntroductionUnderstanding the stress recovery of trees, particularly with respect to increasing droughts due to climate change, is crucial. An often-overlooked aspect is how short versus long drought events of high intensity (i.e., low and high stress dose) result in stress damage and affect post-stress recovery.MethodsThis study examines the stress and recovery dynamics of 3-year-old Picea abies following a short drought (n = 5) of 18 days or a long drought (n = 9) of 51 days during late summer. We particularly assessed how the recovery of canopy conductance and tree transpiration is linked to i) stress intensity in terms of minimum water potential, ii) stress duration inferred by days below a water potential related to 12% hydraulic conductance loss (dP12), iii) stress dose inferred by the cumulative tree water deficit on days below P12 (TWDP12) as well as the cumulative water potential (Ψcum), and iv) the percent loss of conductive xylem area (PLA).ResultsBoth drought treatments resulted in stem and root embolism with a higher PLA of 49% ± 10% in the long drought treatment compared to 18% ± 6% in the short drought treatment consistent across the measured plant parts. Suffering from embolism and leaf shedding (long drought, 32%; short drought, 12%), canopy conductance in the long drought treatment recovered to 41% ± 3% of the control and in the short drought treatment to 66% ± 4% at 12 days after drought release. These recovery rates were well explained by the observed PLA (R2 = 0.66) and the dP12 (R2 = 0.62) but best explained by stress dose metrics, particularly the cumulative TWDP12 (R2 = 0.88).DiscussionOur study highlights that stress duration and intensity should be integrated to assess post-stress recovery rates. Here, the tree water deficit derived from point dendrometers appears promising, as it provides a non-destructive and high temporal resolution of the stress dose.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1542301/fullstress recoverydrought stresstree water deficitstress dosetree water fluxes
spellingShingle Timo Knüver
Timo Knüver
Andreas Bär
Elias Hamann
Marcus Zuber
Stefan Mayr
Barbara Beikircher
Nadine K. Ruehr
Stress dose explains drought recovery in Norway spruce
Frontiers in Plant Science
stress recovery
drought stress
tree water deficit
stress dose
tree water fluxes
title Stress dose explains drought recovery in Norway spruce
title_full Stress dose explains drought recovery in Norway spruce
title_fullStr Stress dose explains drought recovery in Norway spruce
title_full_unstemmed Stress dose explains drought recovery in Norway spruce
title_short Stress dose explains drought recovery in Norway spruce
title_sort stress dose explains drought recovery in norway spruce
topic stress recovery
drought stress
tree water deficit
stress dose
tree water fluxes
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1542301/full
work_keys_str_mv AT timoknuver stressdoseexplainsdroughtrecoveryinnorwayspruce
AT timoknuver stressdoseexplainsdroughtrecoveryinnorwayspruce
AT andreasbar stressdoseexplainsdroughtrecoveryinnorwayspruce
AT eliashamann stressdoseexplainsdroughtrecoveryinnorwayspruce
AT marcuszuber stressdoseexplainsdroughtrecoveryinnorwayspruce
AT stefanmayr stressdoseexplainsdroughtrecoveryinnorwayspruce
AT barbarabeikircher stressdoseexplainsdroughtrecoveryinnorwayspruce
AT nadinekruehr stressdoseexplainsdroughtrecoveryinnorwayspruce