A noise audit of the peer review of a scientific article: a WPOM journal case study
This study aims to be one of the first to analyse the noise level in the peer review process of scientific articles. Noise is defined as the undesired variability in the judgements made by professionals on the same topic or subject. We refer to evaluative judgements in which experts are expected to...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Tomas Bonavia, Juan A. Marin-Garcia |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universitat Politècnica de València
2023-07-01
|
| Series: | WPOM : Working Papers on Operations Management |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://polipapers.upv.es/index.php/WPOM/article/view/19631 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Choice Bracketing revisited: Replication and extensions Registered Report of seven experiments reviewed in Read et al. (1999)
by: Chun Lam Wong, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01) -
Demystifying perception and decision-making in peer review: a semantic perspective
by: Yujie Zhang, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01) -
Revisiting the effects of helper intentions on gratitude and indebtedness: Replication and extensions Registered Report of Tsang (2006)
by: Chi Fung Chan, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01) -
Online peer assessment in Galenic Pharmacy: enhancing evaluative judgement in higher education
by: Elena Cano García, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Anaesthesiologists’ guideline adherence in pre-operative evaluation: a retrospective observational study
by: Simone Maria Kagerbauer, et al.
Published: (2024-06-01)