Engagement With Digital Adherence Technologies as Measures of Intervention Fidelity Among Adults With Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis and Health Care Providers: Descriptive Analysis Using Data From Cluster-Randomized Trials in Five Countries

Abstract BackgroundDigital adherence technologies (DATs) are promising tools for supporting tuberculosis (TB) treatment. DATs can serve as reminders for people with TB to take their medication and act as proxies for adherence monitoring. Strong engagement with DATs, from both...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jason Alacapa, Amare Worku Tadesse, Natasha Deyanova, Tanyaradzwa Dube, Andrew Mganga, Rachel Powers, Job van Rest, Norma Madden, Egwuma Efo, Salome Charalambous, Kristian van Kalmthout, Degu Jerene, Katherine Fielding
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2025-07-01
Series:JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
Online Access:https://publichealth.jmir.org/2025/1/e62881
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849336027090518016
author Jason Alacapa
Amare Worku Tadesse
Natasha Deyanova
Tanyaradzwa Dube
Andrew Mganga
Rachel Powers
Job van Rest
Norma Madden
Egwuma Efo
Salome Charalambous
Kristian van Kalmthout
Degu Jerene
Katherine Fielding
author_facet Jason Alacapa
Amare Worku Tadesse
Natasha Deyanova
Tanyaradzwa Dube
Andrew Mganga
Rachel Powers
Job van Rest
Norma Madden
Egwuma Efo
Salome Charalambous
Kristian van Kalmthout
Degu Jerene
Katherine Fielding
author_sort Jason Alacapa
collection DOAJ
description Abstract BackgroundDigital adherence technologies (DATs) are promising tools for supporting tuberculosis (TB) treatment. DATs can serve as reminders for people with TB to take their medication and act as proxies for adherence monitoring. Strong engagement with DATs, from both the person with TB and health care provider (HCP) perspectives, is essential for ensuring intervention fidelity. The Adherence Support Coalition to End TB (ASCENT) project evaluated 2 types of DATs, pillboxes and medication labels (99DOTS), in cluster-randomized trials across 5 countries. ObjectiveThis study aims to investigate participant and HCP engagement with DATs for TB treatment, stratified by DAT type and country. MethodsThis study is a subanalysis of data generated through the ASCENT trials, which enrolled adults with drug-susceptible TB. A digital dose was defined as either a pillbox opening (for pillbox users) or a dosing confirmation SMS text message sent by the participant (for label users), both of which were recorded on the adherence platform. Descriptive analysis was used to provide an overview of dose-day outcomes. DAT engagement was assessed from both participant and HCP perspectives. To enhance participant engagement, we summarized the frequency of digital engagement overall and by treatment phase, as well as the frequency of consecutive days without engagement. For HCP engagement, we summarized the frequency of doses added manually, the number of days between the actual dose day and when a manual dose was added, and instances of consecutive manual dosing lasting more than 3 and more than 7 days, where doses were added more than 1 week after the dose day. ResultsOf the 9511 participants included, 6719 (70.64%) were using the pillbox, 3544 (37.26%) were female, and the median age was 40 years. Across DAT types, there were 1,384,879 dose days, with 973,876 (70.32%) contributed by pillbox users. Of all dose days, 1,165,195 (84.14%) were recorded as digital, 156,664 (11.31%) as manual, 59,045 (4.26%) had no information, and 3975 (0.29%) were confirmed as missed. Digital dosing decreased slightly from the intensive to the continuation phase. The percentage of digital dose days was higher among pillbox users (851,496/973,876, 87.43%) compared with label users (313,699/411,003, 76.33%). Among label users, manual dosing was most common in the Philippines (37,919/171,786, 22.07%) and least common in Tanzania (11,108/76,231, 14.57%). Among pillbox users, manual dosing was most common in the Philippines (24,015/208,130, 11.54%) and Ukraine (13,209/111,901, 11.80%). Overall, 512 out of 2792 (18.34%) label users and 588 out of 6719 (8.75%) pillbox users experienced a run of more than 7 consecutive nondigital dose days that were resolved more than 1 week after the dose day. The highest occurrence was observed in the Philippines (368/1142, 32.22%, for label users and 224/1351, 16.58%, for pillbox users). ConclusionsThere was considerable variation in DAT engagement across countries and DAT types, reflecting differences in how the intervention was implemented. Further refinement of the intervention and improvements in its delivery may be necessary to enhance outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-04bfac95ebc84f32a5a3ed63fcfd6364
institution Kabale University
issn 2369-2960
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
spelling doaj-art-04bfac95ebc84f32a5a3ed63fcfd63642025-08-20T03:45:06ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Public Health and Surveillance2369-29602025-07-0111e62881e6288110.2196/62881Engagement With Digital Adherence Technologies as Measures of Intervention Fidelity Among Adults With Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis and Health Care Providers: Descriptive Analysis Using Data From Cluster-Randomized Trials in Five CountriesJason Alacapahttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-0794-3947Amare Worku Tadessehttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-7805-3191Natasha Deyanovahttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-0768-4877Tanyaradzwa Dubehttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-3928-7574Andrew Mgangahttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-7664-8354Rachel Powershttp://orcid.org/0009-0003-5930-7162Job van Resthttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-5898-6306Norma Maddenhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-7667-2108Egwuma Efohttp://orcid.org/0009-0004-4723-5955Salome Charalamboushttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-7143-1009Kristian van Kalmthouthttp://orcid.org/0009-0007-2526-1708Degu Jerenehttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-7853-4211Katherine Fieldinghttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-6524-3754 Abstract BackgroundDigital adherence technologies (DATs) are promising tools for supporting tuberculosis (TB) treatment. DATs can serve as reminders for people with TB to take their medication and act as proxies for adherence monitoring. Strong engagement with DATs, from both the person with TB and health care provider (HCP) perspectives, is essential for ensuring intervention fidelity. The Adherence Support Coalition to End TB (ASCENT) project evaluated 2 types of DATs, pillboxes and medication labels (99DOTS), in cluster-randomized trials across 5 countries. ObjectiveThis study aims to investigate participant and HCP engagement with DATs for TB treatment, stratified by DAT type and country. MethodsThis study is a subanalysis of data generated through the ASCENT trials, which enrolled adults with drug-susceptible TB. A digital dose was defined as either a pillbox opening (for pillbox users) or a dosing confirmation SMS text message sent by the participant (for label users), both of which were recorded on the adherence platform. Descriptive analysis was used to provide an overview of dose-day outcomes. DAT engagement was assessed from both participant and HCP perspectives. To enhance participant engagement, we summarized the frequency of digital engagement overall and by treatment phase, as well as the frequency of consecutive days without engagement. For HCP engagement, we summarized the frequency of doses added manually, the number of days between the actual dose day and when a manual dose was added, and instances of consecutive manual dosing lasting more than 3 and more than 7 days, where doses were added more than 1 week after the dose day. ResultsOf the 9511 participants included, 6719 (70.64%) were using the pillbox, 3544 (37.26%) were female, and the median age was 40 years. Across DAT types, there were 1,384,879 dose days, with 973,876 (70.32%) contributed by pillbox users. Of all dose days, 1,165,195 (84.14%) were recorded as digital, 156,664 (11.31%) as manual, 59,045 (4.26%) had no information, and 3975 (0.29%) were confirmed as missed. Digital dosing decreased slightly from the intensive to the continuation phase. The percentage of digital dose days was higher among pillbox users (851,496/973,876, 87.43%) compared with label users (313,699/411,003, 76.33%). Among label users, manual dosing was most common in the Philippines (37,919/171,786, 22.07%) and least common in Tanzania (11,108/76,231, 14.57%). Among pillbox users, manual dosing was most common in the Philippines (24,015/208,130, 11.54%) and Ukraine (13,209/111,901, 11.80%). Overall, 512 out of 2792 (18.34%) label users and 588 out of 6719 (8.75%) pillbox users experienced a run of more than 7 consecutive nondigital dose days that were resolved more than 1 week after the dose day. The highest occurrence was observed in the Philippines (368/1142, 32.22%, for label users and 224/1351, 16.58%, for pillbox users). ConclusionsThere was considerable variation in DAT engagement across countries and DAT types, reflecting differences in how the intervention was implemented. Further refinement of the intervention and improvements in its delivery may be necessary to enhance outcomes.https://publichealth.jmir.org/2025/1/e62881
spellingShingle Jason Alacapa
Amare Worku Tadesse
Natasha Deyanova
Tanyaradzwa Dube
Andrew Mganga
Rachel Powers
Job van Rest
Norma Madden
Egwuma Efo
Salome Charalambous
Kristian van Kalmthout
Degu Jerene
Katherine Fielding
Engagement With Digital Adherence Technologies as Measures of Intervention Fidelity Among Adults With Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis and Health Care Providers: Descriptive Analysis Using Data From Cluster-Randomized Trials in Five Countries
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
title Engagement With Digital Adherence Technologies as Measures of Intervention Fidelity Among Adults With Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis and Health Care Providers: Descriptive Analysis Using Data From Cluster-Randomized Trials in Five Countries
title_full Engagement With Digital Adherence Technologies as Measures of Intervention Fidelity Among Adults With Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis and Health Care Providers: Descriptive Analysis Using Data From Cluster-Randomized Trials in Five Countries
title_fullStr Engagement With Digital Adherence Technologies as Measures of Intervention Fidelity Among Adults With Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis and Health Care Providers: Descriptive Analysis Using Data From Cluster-Randomized Trials in Five Countries
title_full_unstemmed Engagement With Digital Adherence Technologies as Measures of Intervention Fidelity Among Adults With Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis and Health Care Providers: Descriptive Analysis Using Data From Cluster-Randomized Trials in Five Countries
title_short Engagement With Digital Adherence Technologies as Measures of Intervention Fidelity Among Adults With Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis and Health Care Providers: Descriptive Analysis Using Data From Cluster-Randomized Trials in Five Countries
title_sort engagement with digital adherence technologies as measures of intervention fidelity among adults with drug susceptible tuberculosis and health care providers descriptive analysis using data from cluster randomized trials in five countries
url https://publichealth.jmir.org/2025/1/e62881
work_keys_str_mv AT jasonalacapa engagementwithdigitaladherencetechnologiesasmeasuresofinterventionfidelityamongadultswithdrugsusceptibletuberculosisandhealthcareprovidersdescriptiveanalysisusingdatafromclusterrandomizedtrialsinfivecountries
AT amareworkutadesse engagementwithdigitaladherencetechnologiesasmeasuresofinterventionfidelityamongadultswithdrugsusceptibletuberculosisandhealthcareprovidersdescriptiveanalysisusingdatafromclusterrandomizedtrialsinfivecountries
AT natashadeyanova engagementwithdigitaladherencetechnologiesasmeasuresofinterventionfidelityamongadultswithdrugsusceptibletuberculosisandhealthcareprovidersdescriptiveanalysisusingdatafromclusterrandomizedtrialsinfivecountries
AT tanyaradzwadube engagementwithdigitaladherencetechnologiesasmeasuresofinterventionfidelityamongadultswithdrugsusceptibletuberculosisandhealthcareprovidersdescriptiveanalysisusingdatafromclusterrandomizedtrialsinfivecountries
AT andrewmganga engagementwithdigitaladherencetechnologiesasmeasuresofinterventionfidelityamongadultswithdrugsusceptibletuberculosisandhealthcareprovidersdescriptiveanalysisusingdatafromclusterrandomizedtrialsinfivecountries
AT rachelpowers engagementwithdigitaladherencetechnologiesasmeasuresofinterventionfidelityamongadultswithdrugsusceptibletuberculosisandhealthcareprovidersdescriptiveanalysisusingdatafromclusterrandomizedtrialsinfivecountries
AT jobvanrest engagementwithdigitaladherencetechnologiesasmeasuresofinterventionfidelityamongadultswithdrugsusceptibletuberculosisandhealthcareprovidersdescriptiveanalysisusingdatafromclusterrandomizedtrialsinfivecountries
AT normamadden engagementwithdigitaladherencetechnologiesasmeasuresofinterventionfidelityamongadultswithdrugsusceptibletuberculosisandhealthcareprovidersdescriptiveanalysisusingdatafromclusterrandomizedtrialsinfivecountries
AT egwumaefo engagementwithdigitaladherencetechnologiesasmeasuresofinterventionfidelityamongadultswithdrugsusceptibletuberculosisandhealthcareprovidersdescriptiveanalysisusingdatafromclusterrandomizedtrialsinfivecountries
AT salomecharalambous engagementwithdigitaladherencetechnologiesasmeasuresofinterventionfidelityamongadultswithdrugsusceptibletuberculosisandhealthcareprovidersdescriptiveanalysisusingdatafromclusterrandomizedtrialsinfivecountries
AT kristianvankalmthout engagementwithdigitaladherencetechnologiesasmeasuresofinterventionfidelityamongadultswithdrugsusceptibletuberculosisandhealthcareprovidersdescriptiveanalysisusingdatafromclusterrandomizedtrialsinfivecountries
AT degujerene engagementwithdigitaladherencetechnologiesasmeasuresofinterventionfidelityamongadultswithdrugsusceptibletuberculosisandhealthcareprovidersdescriptiveanalysisusingdatafromclusterrandomizedtrialsinfivecountries
AT katherinefielding engagementwithdigitaladherencetechnologiesasmeasuresofinterventionfidelityamongadultswithdrugsusceptibletuberculosisandhealthcareprovidersdescriptiveanalysisusingdatafromclusterrandomizedtrialsinfivecountries