Evaluation of Fluorescein Diacetate Viability Staining during Treatment Follow-up Examinations of Smear Positive Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients

Background: Assessment of treatment response to pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) is currently done by follow-up cultures since smear microscopy cannot distinguish viable from nonviable bacilli. This delays the therapeutic decision and increases the work load on the TB laboratories. This study evaluated t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ujjwala Nitin Gaikwad, Padma Das, Anudita Bhargava, Ajoy Kumar Behera, Tushar Bharat Jagzape, Sachin Chandraker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-01-01
Series:International Journal of Mycobacteriology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_220_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850269686685499392
author Ujjwala Nitin Gaikwad
Padma Das
Anudita Bhargava
Ajoy Kumar Behera
Tushar Bharat Jagzape
Sachin Chandraker
author_facet Ujjwala Nitin Gaikwad
Padma Das
Anudita Bhargava
Ajoy Kumar Behera
Tushar Bharat Jagzape
Sachin Chandraker
author_sort Ujjwala Nitin Gaikwad
collection DOAJ
description Background: Assessment of treatment response to pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) is currently done by follow-up cultures since smear microscopy cannot distinguish viable from nonviable bacilli. This delays the therapeutic decision and increases the work load on the TB laboratories. This study evaluated the utility of fluorescein diacetate (FDA) viability staining against culture as a modality to assess treatment response in patients receiving anti tubercular treatment. Methods: In a cross-sectional study conducted for 2 years at a tertiary care hospital, around 110 follow-up sputum samples from patients with initial smear positivity were collected. After being processed for light-emitting diode fluorescence (FL) microscopy and liquid culture by MGIT 960, the samples were subjected to FDA viability staining as an additional step. FDA staining and FL microscopy results were compared to culture to determine its diagnostic accuracy in predicting bacterial viability. Results: The positivity rates for FL microscopy, FDA microscopy, and culture were 17%, 10%, and 8.18%, respectively. Culture results correlated with FL microscopy in 83.6% of cases and with FDA staining in 94.5%. FDA staining outperformed FL microscopy in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and NPV, with values of 77.7%, 96.04%, 63.6%, and 97.9%, respectively. Among FL microscopy positive samples, FDA staining demonstrated 100% sensitivity and NPV, but poor specificity and PPV (57.14% and 45.45%, respectively) owing to false positive results in some cases. Conclusion: FDA viability staining proved to be a better predictor of bacteriological clearance during follow-up examinations of patients on antitubercular therapy and may be explored in future research.
format Article
id doaj-art-04743f2adb67410cb321d68314e84de7
institution OA Journals
issn 2212-5531
2212-554X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series International Journal of Mycobacteriology
spelling doaj-art-04743f2adb67410cb321d68314e84de72025-08-20T01:53:00ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsInternational Journal of Mycobacteriology2212-55312212-554X2025-01-01141303510.4103/ijmy.ijmy_220_24Evaluation of Fluorescein Diacetate Viability Staining during Treatment Follow-up Examinations of Smear Positive Pulmonary Tuberculosis PatientsUjjwala Nitin GaikwadPadma DasAnudita BhargavaAjoy Kumar BeheraTushar Bharat JagzapeSachin ChandrakerBackground: Assessment of treatment response to pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) is currently done by follow-up cultures since smear microscopy cannot distinguish viable from nonviable bacilli. This delays the therapeutic decision and increases the work load on the TB laboratories. This study evaluated the utility of fluorescein diacetate (FDA) viability staining against culture as a modality to assess treatment response in patients receiving anti tubercular treatment. Methods: In a cross-sectional study conducted for 2 years at a tertiary care hospital, around 110 follow-up sputum samples from patients with initial smear positivity were collected. After being processed for light-emitting diode fluorescence (FL) microscopy and liquid culture by MGIT 960, the samples were subjected to FDA viability staining as an additional step. FDA staining and FL microscopy results were compared to culture to determine its diagnostic accuracy in predicting bacterial viability. Results: The positivity rates for FL microscopy, FDA microscopy, and culture were 17%, 10%, and 8.18%, respectively. Culture results correlated with FL microscopy in 83.6% of cases and with FDA staining in 94.5%. FDA staining outperformed FL microscopy in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and NPV, with values of 77.7%, 96.04%, 63.6%, and 97.9%, respectively. Among FL microscopy positive samples, FDA staining demonstrated 100% sensitivity and NPV, but poor specificity and PPV (57.14% and 45.45%, respectively) owing to false positive results in some cases. Conclusion: FDA viability staining proved to be a better predictor of bacteriological clearance during follow-up examinations of patients on antitubercular therapy and may be explored in future research.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_220_24fluorescein diacetatetreatment follow uptuberculosisviability staining
spellingShingle Ujjwala Nitin Gaikwad
Padma Das
Anudita Bhargava
Ajoy Kumar Behera
Tushar Bharat Jagzape
Sachin Chandraker
Evaluation of Fluorescein Diacetate Viability Staining during Treatment Follow-up Examinations of Smear Positive Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients
International Journal of Mycobacteriology
fluorescein diacetate
treatment follow up
tuberculosis
viability staining
title Evaluation of Fluorescein Diacetate Viability Staining during Treatment Follow-up Examinations of Smear Positive Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients
title_full Evaluation of Fluorescein Diacetate Viability Staining during Treatment Follow-up Examinations of Smear Positive Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients
title_fullStr Evaluation of Fluorescein Diacetate Viability Staining during Treatment Follow-up Examinations of Smear Positive Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Fluorescein Diacetate Viability Staining during Treatment Follow-up Examinations of Smear Positive Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients
title_short Evaluation of Fluorescein Diacetate Viability Staining during Treatment Follow-up Examinations of Smear Positive Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients
title_sort evaluation of fluorescein diacetate viability staining during treatment follow up examinations of smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients
topic fluorescein diacetate
treatment follow up
tuberculosis
viability staining
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_220_24
work_keys_str_mv AT ujjwalanitingaikwad evaluationoffluoresceindiacetateviabilitystainingduringtreatmentfollowupexaminationsofsmearpositivepulmonarytuberculosispatients
AT padmadas evaluationoffluoresceindiacetateviabilitystainingduringtreatmentfollowupexaminationsofsmearpositivepulmonarytuberculosispatients
AT anuditabhargava evaluationoffluoresceindiacetateviabilitystainingduringtreatmentfollowupexaminationsofsmearpositivepulmonarytuberculosispatients
AT ajoykumarbehera evaluationoffluoresceindiacetateviabilitystainingduringtreatmentfollowupexaminationsofsmearpositivepulmonarytuberculosispatients
AT tusharbharatjagzape evaluationoffluoresceindiacetateviabilitystainingduringtreatmentfollowupexaminationsofsmearpositivepulmonarytuberculosispatients
AT sachinchandraker evaluationoffluoresceindiacetateviabilitystainingduringtreatmentfollowupexaminationsofsmearpositivepulmonarytuberculosispatients