REVIEW OF IRRECONCILABLE DECISIONS
This article proposes a theoretical and practical approach of the review case which refers to the hypothesis in which two final decisions cannot be reconciled. The author is making an analysis even by the reference to two specific practical situations in which two courts of appeal have given radic...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House
2019-05-01
|
| Series: | Challenges of the Knowledge Society |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2019_articles%252F1_criminal_law%252FCKS_2019_criminal_law_018.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850060587377098752 |
|---|---|
| author | Bogdan MICU |
| author_facet | Bogdan MICU |
| author_sort | Bogdan MICU |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This article proposes a theoretical and practical approach of the review case which refers to the hypothesis in which two final decisions cannot be reconciled. The author is making an analysis even by the reference to two specific practical situations in which two courts of appeal have given radical solutions in two cases which were ruled in an erroneous manner by the merits court. In the given situations, the two panels of appeal invalidated each other’s reasoning through their rulings. By reference to these hypotheses, which were not generalized so that a ruling by means of a second appeal in the interest of the law could be opportune, the author proposes an extension of the invoked review case also with respect thereto. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-043893e95da74fa686fbdf69eef60d9c |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2068-7796 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2019-05-01 |
| publisher | Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Challenges of the Knowledge Society |
| spelling | doaj-art-043893e95da74fa686fbdf69eef60d9c2025-08-20T02:50:30ZengNicolae Titulescu University Publishing HouseChallenges of the Knowledge Society2068-77962019-05-01131138143REVIEW OF IRRECONCILABLE DECISIONSBogdan MICU0Faculty of Law, “Nicolae Titulescu” University of Bucharest, RomaniaThis article proposes a theoretical and practical approach of the review case which refers to the hypothesis in which two final decisions cannot be reconciled. The author is making an analysis even by the reference to two specific practical situations in which two courts of appeal have given radical solutions in two cases which were ruled in an erroneous manner by the merits court. In the given situations, the two panels of appeal invalidated each other’s reasoning through their rulings. By reference to these hypotheses, which were not generalized so that a ruling by means of a second appeal in the interest of the law could be opportune, the author proposes an extension of the invoked review case also with respect thereto.http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2019_articles%252F1_criminal_law%252FCKS_2019_criminal_law_018.pdfreviewextraordinary means of challengeirreconcilable decisionscriminal lawsuitfinal decisions |
| spellingShingle | Bogdan MICU REVIEW OF IRRECONCILABLE DECISIONS Challenges of the Knowledge Society review extraordinary means of challenge irreconcilable decisions criminal lawsuit final decisions |
| title | REVIEW OF IRRECONCILABLE DECISIONS |
| title_full | REVIEW OF IRRECONCILABLE DECISIONS |
| title_fullStr | REVIEW OF IRRECONCILABLE DECISIONS |
| title_full_unstemmed | REVIEW OF IRRECONCILABLE DECISIONS |
| title_short | REVIEW OF IRRECONCILABLE DECISIONS |
| title_sort | review of irreconcilable decisions |
| topic | review extraordinary means of challenge irreconcilable decisions criminal lawsuit final decisions |
| url | http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2019_articles%252F1_criminal_law%252FCKS_2019_criminal_law_018.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bogdanmicu reviewofirreconcilabledecisions |