Energy Conversion by Parallel Electric Fields During Guide Field Reconnection in Scaled Laboratory and Space Experiments

Abstract We present direct and scaled comparisons between laboratory and in situ space observations of magnetic reconnection with a guide field, comparing results from the Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission and the Magnetic Reconnection eXperiment (MRX). While Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission observ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: W. Fox, Victoria Wilder, S. Eriksson, J. Jara‐Almonte, F. Pucci, J. Yoo, H. Ji, M. Yamada, R. E. Ergun, M. Oieroset, T. D. Phan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-12-01
Series:Geophysical Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079883
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849727949133053952
author W. Fox
Victoria Wilder
S. Eriksson
J. Jara‐Almonte
F. Pucci
J. Yoo
H. Ji
M. Yamada
R. E. Ergun
M. Oieroset
T. D. Phan
author_facet W. Fox
Victoria Wilder
S. Eriksson
J. Jara‐Almonte
F. Pucci
J. Yoo
H. Ji
M. Yamada
R. E. Ergun
M. Oieroset
T. D. Phan
author_sort W. Fox
collection DOAJ
description Abstract We present direct and scaled comparisons between laboratory and in situ space observations of magnetic reconnection with a guide field, comparing results from the Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission and the Magnetic Reconnection eXperiment (MRX). While Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission observations obtain high‐resolution and fully kinetic data, MRX observations fully cover the 2‐D reconnection plane near the current sheet, removing uncertainties in situating the measurements compared to the reconnection region. Through scaling transformations, we show a quantitative agreement in magnetic field and current density profiles, which agree within a factor of 2 from each other. The introduction of the guide field causes the energy conversion J·E in the current sheet to be dominated by J||E|| in both cases. However, parallel electric fields reported by recent spacecraft crossings are significantly (5–10 times) larger than values obtained on MRX, highlighting an important issue for understanding energy conversion by reconnection.
format Article
id doaj-art-042cd59ae60f4e4ea937a26ea3c7216c
institution DOAJ
issn 0094-8276
1944-8007
language English
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Geophysical Research Letters
spelling doaj-art-042cd59ae60f4e4ea937a26ea3c7216c2025-08-20T03:09:42ZengWileyGeophysical Research Letters0094-82761944-80072018-12-01452312,67712,68410.1029/2018GL079883Energy Conversion by Parallel Electric Fields During Guide Field Reconnection in Scaled Laboratory and Space ExperimentsW. Fox0Victoria Wilder1S. Eriksson2J. Jara‐Almonte3F. Pucci4J. Yoo5H. Ji6M. Yamada7R. E. Ergun8M. Oieroset9T. D. Phan10Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton NJ USALaboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics University of Colorado Boulder Boulder CO USALaboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics University of Colorado Boulder Boulder CO USAPrinceton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton NJ USAPrinceton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton NJ USAPrinceton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton NJ USAPrinceton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton NJ USAPrinceton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton NJ USALaboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics University of Colorado Boulder Boulder CO USASpace Sciences Laboratory University of California Berkeley CA USASpace Sciences Laboratory University of California Berkeley CA USAAbstract We present direct and scaled comparisons between laboratory and in situ space observations of magnetic reconnection with a guide field, comparing results from the Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission and the Magnetic Reconnection eXperiment (MRX). While Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission observations obtain high‐resolution and fully kinetic data, MRX observations fully cover the 2‐D reconnection plane near the current sheet, removing uncertainties in situating the measurements compared to the reconnection region. Through scaling transformations, we show a quantitative agreement in magnetic field and current density profiles, which agree within a factor of 2 from each other. The introduction of the guide field causes the energy conversion J·E in the current sheet to be dominated by J||E|| in both cases. However, parallel electric fields reported by recent spacecraft crossings are significantly (5–10 times) larger than values obtained on MRX, highlighting an important issue for understanding energy conversion by reconnection.https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079883magnetic reconnectionmagnetosphereenergy conversionguide fieldexperiment
spellingShingle W. Fox
Victoria Wilder
S. Eriksson
J. Jara‐Almonte
F. Pucci
J. Yoo
H. Ji
M. Yamada
R. E. Ergun
M. Oieroset
T. D. Phan
Energy Conversion by Parallel Electric Fields During Guide Field Reconnection in Scaled Laboratory and Space Experiments
Geophysical Research Letters
magnetic reconnection
magnetosphere
energy conversion
guide field
experiment
title Energy Conversion by Parallel Electric Fields During Guide Field Reconnection in Scaled Laboratory and Space Experiments
title_full Energy Conversion by Parallel Electric Fields During Guide Field Reconnection in Scaled Laboratory and Space Experiments
title_fullStr Energy Conversion by Parallel Electric Fields During Guide Field Reconnection in Scaled Laboratory and Space Experiments
title_full_unstemmed Energy Conversion by Parallel Electric Fields During Guide Field Reconnection in Scaled Laboratory and Space Experiments
title_short Energy Conversion by Parallel Electric Fields During Guide Field Reconnection in Scaled Laboratory and Space Experiments
title_sort energy conversion by parallel electric fields during guide field reconnection in scaled laboratory and space experiments
topic magnetic reconnection
magnetosphere
energy conversion
guide field
experiment
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079883
work_keys_str_mv AT wfox energyconversionbyparallelelectricfieldsduringguidefieldreconnectioninscaledlaboratoryandspaceexperiments
AT victoriawilder energyconversionbyparallelelectricfieldsduringguidefieldreconnectioninscaledlaboratoryandspaceexperiments
AT seriksson energyconversionbyparallelelectricfieldsduringguidefieldreconnectioninscaledlaboratoryandspaceexperiments
AT jjaraalmonte energyconversionbyparallelelectricfieldsduringguidefieldreconnectioninscaledlaboratoryandspaceexperiments
AT fpucci energyconversionbyparallelelectricfieldsduringguidefieldreconnectioninscaledlaboratoryandspaceexperiments
AT jyoo energyconversionbyparallelelectricfieldsduringguidefieldreconnectioninscaledlaboratoryandspaceexperiments
AT hji energyconversionbyparallelelectricfieldsduringguidefieldreconnectioninscaledlaboratoryandspaceexperiments
AT myamada energyconversionbyparallelelectricfieldsduringguidefieldreconnectioninscaledlaboratoryandspaceexperiments
AT reergun energyconversionbyparallelelectricfieldsduringguidefieldreconnectioninscaledlaboratoryandspaceexperiments
AT moieroset energyconversionbyparallelelectricfieldsduringguidefieldreconnectioninscaledlaboratoryandspaceexperiments
AT tdphan energyconversionbyparallelelectricfieldsduringguidefieldreconnectioninscaledlaboratoryandspaceexperiments