Assessing dual use risks in AI research: necessity, challenges and mitigation strategies
This article argues that due to the difficulty in governing AI, it is essential to develop measures implemented early in the AI research process. The goal of dual use considerations is to create robust strategies that uphold AI’s integrity while protecting societal interests. The challenges of apply...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | Research Ethics Review |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161241267782 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849713124444209152 |
|---|---|
| author | Andreas Brenneis |
| author_facet | Andreas Brenneis |
| author_sort | Andreas Brenneis |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This article argues that due to the difficulty in governing AI, it is essential to develop measures implemented early in the AI research process. The goal of dual use considerations is to create robust strategies that uphold AI’s integrity while protecting societal interests. The challenges of applying dual use frameworks to AI research are examined and dual use and dual use research of concern (DURC) are defined while highlighting the difficulties in balancing the technology’s benefits and risks. AI’s dual use potential is discussed, particularly in areas like NLP and LLMs, and the need for early consideration of dual use risks to ensure ethical and secure development is underscored. In the section on shared responsibilities in AI research and avenues for mitigation strategies the importance of early-stage risk assessments and ethical guidelines to mitigate misuse is emphasized, accentuating self-governance within scientific communities and structured measures like checklists and pre-registration to promote responsible research practices. The final section argues that research ethics committees play a crucial role in evaluating the dual use implications of AI technologies within the research pipeline. The need for tailored ethics review processes is articulated, drawing parallels with medical research ethics committees. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-03b18c8bd04b4619a7fe506f21d86f38 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1747-0161 2047-6094 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-04-01 |
| publisher | SAGE Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Research Ethics Review |
| spelling | doaj-art-03b18c8bd04b4619a7fe506f21d86f382025-08-20T03:14:02ZengSAGE PublishingResearch Ethics Review1747-01612047-60942025-04-012110.1177/17470161241267782Assessing dual use risks in AI research: necessity, challenges and mitigation strategiesAndreas BrenneisThis article argues that due to the difficulty in governing AI, it is essential to develop measures implemented early in the AI research process. The goal of dual use considerations is to create robust strategies that uphold AI’s integrity while protecting societal interests. The challenges of applying dual use frameworks to AI research are examined and dual use and dual use research of concern (DURC) are defined while highlighting the difficulties in balancing the technology’s benefits and risks. AI’s dual use potential is discussed, particularly in areas like NLP and LLMs, and the need for early consideration of dual use risks to ensure ethical and secure development is underscored. In the section on shared responsibilities in AI research and avenues for mitigation strategies the importance of early-stage risk assessments and ethical guidelines to mitigate misuse is emphasized, accentuating self-governance within scientific communities and structured measures like checklists and pre-registration to promote responsible research practices. The final section argues that research ethics committees play a crucial role in evaluating the dual use implications of AI technologies within the research pipeline. The need for tailored ethics review processes is articulated, drawing parallels with medical research ethics committees.https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161241267782 |
| spellingShingle | Andreas Brenneis Assessing dual use risks in AI research: necessity, challenges and mitigation strategies Research Ethics Review |
| title | Assessing dual use risks in AI research: necessity, challenges and mitigation strategies |
| title_full | Assessing dual use risks in AI research: necessity, challenges and mitigation strategies |
| title_fullStr | Assessing dual use risks in AI research: necessity, challenges and mitigation strategies |
| title_full_unstemmed | Assessing dual use risks in AI research: necessity, challenges and mitigation strategies |
| title_short | Assessing dual use risks in AI research: necessity, challenges and mitigation strategies |
| title_sort | assessing dual use risks in ai research necessity challenges and mitigation strategies |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161241267782 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT andreasbrenneis assessingdualuserisksinairesearchnecessitychallengesandmitigationstrategies |