Effects of radiotransmitters and breeding effort on harvest and survival rates of female mallards

Abstract There has been widespread speculation that breeding activity places adult female mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) at heightened risk of harvest due to insufficient time to complete the wing molt or recover body condition prior to onset of hunting and autumn migration. We tested the hypotheses...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Todd W. Arnold, David W. Howerter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-06-01
Series:Wildlife Society Bulletin
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.134
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850256972556795904
author Todd W. Arnold
David W. Howerter
author_facet Todd W. Arnold
David W. Howerter
author_sort Todd W. Arnold
collection DOAJ
description Abstract There has been widespread speculation that breeding activity places adult female mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) at heightened risk of harvest due to insufficient time to complete the wing molt or recover body condition prior to onset of hunting and autumn migration. We tested the hypotheses that breeding females have higher rates of harvest and reduced prospects for survival by estimating band recovery rates (f) and annual survival (S) in relation to individual measures of breeding effort for 3,055 adult female mallards that had been banded and radiomarked during the breeding season in the Prairie‐Parkland Region of Canada, 1993–2000. Birds that had been marked with external prong‐and‐suture transmitters had lower estimated survival rates (S = 0.518, SE = 0.118) than birds marked with implant transmitters (S = 0.731, SE = 0.061), but rates for birds marked with implant transmitters did not differ from expectations based on other studies for females marked only with legbands. After excluding external transmitters, we found that recovery rates were unaffected by any measures of reproductive effort, but annual survival was lower for females that tended broods to 60 days of age (S = 0.474 ± 0.115) versus females that never hatched a nest (S = 0.654 ± 0.042). Telemetry data indicated that brood‐rearing females experienced extremely low mortality, so reduced survival of females that raised broods presumably resulted from insufficient time to molt and prepare for autumn migration. Management efforts that promote successful early nesting attempts may also improve adult female survival by allowing females more time to molt and prepare for autumn migration, whereas hunting regulations designed to protect late‐breeding females may prove ineffective if such individuals have higher natural mortality. © 2012 The Wildlife Society.
format Article
id doaj-art-037e576d93e349a0940be308bfe4aee4
institution OA Journals
issn 2328-5540
language English
publishDate 2012-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wildlife Society Bulletin
spelling doaj-art-037e576d93e349a0940be308bfe4aee42025-08-20T01:56:32ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402012-06-0136228629010.1002/wsb.134Effects of radiotransmitters and breeding effort on harvest and survival rates of female mallardsTodd W. Arnold0David W. Howerter1Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USAInstitute for Wetlands and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada, Stonewall, MB ROC 2Z0, CanadaAbstract There has been widespread speculation that breeding activity places adult female mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) at heightened risk of harvest due to insufficient time to complete the wing molt or recover body condition prior to onset of hunting and autumn migration. We tested the hypotheses that breeding females have higher rates of harvest and reduced prospects for survival by estimating band recovery rates (f) and annual survival (S) in relation to individual measures of breeding effort for 3,055 adult female mallards that had been banded and radiomarked during the breeding season in the Prairie‐Parkland Region of Canada, 1993–2000. Birds that had been marked with external prong‐and‐suture transmitters had lower estimated survival rates (S = 0.518, SE = 0.118) than birds marked with implant transmitters (S = 0.731, SE = 0.061), but rates for birds marked with implant transmitters did not differ from expectations based on other studies for females marked only with legbands. After excluding external transmitters, we found that recovery rates were unaffected by any measures of reproductive effort, but annual survival was lower for females that tended broods to 60 days of age (S = 0.474 ± 0.115) versus females that never hatched a nest (S = 0.654 ± 0.042). Telemetry data indicated that brood‐rearing females experienced extremely low mortality, so reduced survival of females that raised broods presumably resulted from insufficient time to molt and prepare for autumn migration. Management efforts that promote successful early nesting attempts may also improve adult female survival by allowing females more time to molt and prepare for autumn migration, whereas hunting regulations designed to protect late‐breeding females may prove ineffective if such individuals have higher natural mortality. © 2012 The Wildlife Society.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.134
spellingShingle Todd W. Arnold
David W. Howerter
Effects of radiotransmitters and breeding effort on harvest and survival rates of female mallards
Wildlife Society Bulletin
title Effects of radiotransmitters and breeding effort on harvest and survival rates of female mallards
title_full Effects of radiotransmitters and breeding effort on harvest and survival rates of female mallards
title_fullStr Effects of radiotransmitters and breeding effort on harvest and survival rates of female mallards
title_full_unstemmed Effects of radiotransmitters and breeding effort on harvest and survival rates of female mallards
title_short Effects of radiotransmitters and breeding effort on harvest and survival rates of female mallards
title_sort effects of radiotransmitters and breeding effort on harvest and survival rates of female mallards
url https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.134
work_keys_str_mv AT toddwarnold effectsofradiotransmittersandbreedingeffortonharvestandsurvivalratesoffemalemallards
AT davidwhowerter effectsofradiotransmittersandbreedingeffortonharvestandsurvivalratesoffemalemallards