Validation of an instrumented dummy to assess mechanical aspects of discomfort during load carriage.
Due to the increasing load in backpacks and other load carriage systems over the last decades, load carriage system designs have to be adapted accordingly to minimize discomfort and to reduce the risk of injury. As subject studies are labor-intensive and include further challenges such as intra-subj...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2017-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0180069&type=printable |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849766156090474496 |
|---|---|
| author | Patrick D Wettenschwiler Simon Annaheim Silvio Lorenzetti Stephen J Ferguson Rolf Stämpfli Agnes Psikuta René M Rossi |
| author_facet | Patrick D Wettenschwiler Simon Annaheim Silvio Lorenzetti Stephen J Ferguson Rolf Stämpfli Agnes Psikuta René M Rossi |
| author_sort | Patrick D Wettenschwiler |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Due to the increasing load in backpacks and other load carriage systems over the last decades, load carriage system designs have to be adapted accordingly to minimize discomfort and to reduce the risk of injury. As subject studies are labor-intensive and include further challenges such as intra-subject and inter-subject variability, we aimed to validate an instrumented dummy as an objective laboratory tool to assess the mechanical aspects of discomfort. The validation of the instrumented dummy was conducted by comparison with a recent subject study. The mechanical parameters that characterize the static and dynamic interaction between backpack and body during different backpack settings were compared. The second aim was to investigate whether high predictive power (coefficient of determination R2>0.5) in assessing the discomfort of load carriage systems could be reached using the instrumented dummy. Measurements were conducted under static conditions, simulating upright standing, and dynamic conditions, simulating level walking. Twelve different configurations of a typical load carriage system, a commercially available backpack with a hip belt, were assessed. The mechanical parameters were measured in the shoulder and the hip region of the dummy and consisted of average pressure, peak pressure, strap force and relative motion between the system and the body. The twelve configurations consisted of three different weights (15kg, 20kg, and 25kg), combined with four different hip belt tensions (30N, 60N, 90N, and 120N). Through the significant (p<0.05) correlation of the mechanical parameters measured on the dummy with the corresponding values of the subject study, the dummy was validated for all static measurements and for dynamic measurements in the hip region to accurately simulate the interaction between the human body and the load carriage system. Multiple linear regressions with the mechanical parameters measured on the dummy as independent variables and the corresponding subjective discomfort scores from the subject study as the dependent variable revealed a high predictive power of the instrumented dummy. The dummy can explain 75% or more of the variance in discomfort using average pressures as predictors and even 79% or more of the variance in discomfort using strap forces as predictors. Use of the dummy enables objective, fast, and iterative assessments of load carriage systems and therefore reduces the need for labor-intensive subject studies in order to decrease the mechanical aspects of discomfort during load carriage. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-03754efbed0e45b7ad197157ce93e532 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2017-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj-art-03754efbed0e45b7ad197157ce93e5322025-08-20T03:04:39ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01126e018006910.1371/journal.pone.0180069Validation of an instrumented dummy to assess mechanical aspects of discomfort during load carriage.Patrick D WettenschwilerSimon AnnaheimSilvio LorenzettiStephen J FergusonRolf StämpfliAgnes PsikutaRené M RossiDue to the increasing load in backpacks and other load carriage systems over the last decades, load carriage system designs have to be adapted accordingly to minimize discomfort and to reduce the risk of injury. As subject studies are labor-intensive and include further challenges such as intra-subject and inter-subject variability, we aimed to validate an instrumented dummy as an objective laboratory tool to assess the mechanical aspects of discomfort. The validation of the instrumented dummy was conducted by comparison with a recent subject study. The mechanical parameters that characterize the static and dynamic interaction between backpack and body during different backpack settings were compared. The second aim was to investigate whether high predictive power (coefficient of determination R2>0.5) in assessing the discomfort of load carriage systems could be reached using the instrumented dummy. Measurements were conducted under static conditions, simulating upright standing, and dynamic conditions, simulating level walking. Twelve different configurations of a typical load carriage system, a commercially available backpack with a hip belt, were assessed. The mechanical parameters were measured in the shoulder and the hip region of the dummy and consisted of average pressure, peak pressure, strap force and relative motion between the system and the body. The twelve configurations consisted of three different weights (15kg, 20kg, and 25kg), combined with four different hip belt tensions (30N, 60N, 90N, and 120N). Through the significant (p<0.05) correlation of the mechanical parameters measured on the dummy with the corresponding values of the subject study, the dummy was validated for all static measurements and for dynamic measurements in the hip region to accurately simulate the interaction between the human body and the load carriage system. Multiple linear regressions with the mechanical parameters measured on the dummy as independent variables and the corresponding subjective discomfort scores from the subject study as the dependent variable revealed a high predictive power of the instrumented dummy. The dummy can explain 75% or more of the variance in discomfort using average pressures as predictors and even 79% or more of the variance in discomfort using strap forces as predictors. Use of the dummy enables objective, fast, and iterative assessments of load carriage systems and therefore reduces the need for labor-intensive subject studies in order to decrease the mechanical aspects of discomfort during load carriage.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0180069&type=printable |
| spellingShingle | Patrick D Wettenschwiler Simon Annaheim Silvio Lorenzetti Stephen J Ferguson Rolf Stämpfli Agnes Psikuta René M Rossi Validation of an instrumented dummy to assess mechanical aspects of discomfort during load carriage. PLoS ONE |
| title | Validation of an instrumented dummy to assess mechanical aspects of discomfort during load carriage. |
| title_full | Validation of an instrumented dummy to assess mechanical aspects of discomfort during load carriage. |
| title_fullStr | Validation of an instrumented dummy to assess mechanical aspects of discomfort during load carriage. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Validation of an instrumented dummy to assess mechanical aspects of discomfort during load carriage. |
| title_short | Validation of an instrumented dummy to assess mechanical aspects of discomfort during load carriage. |
| title_sort | validation of an instrumented dummy to assess mechanical aspects of discomfort during load carriage |
| url | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0180069&type=printable |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT patrickdwettenschwiler validationofaninstrumenteddummytoassessmechanicalaspectsofdiscomfortduringloadcarriage AT simonannaheim validationofaninstrumenteddummytoassessmechanicalaspectsofdiscomfortduringloadcarriage AT silviolorenzetti validationofaninstrumenteddummytoassessmechanicalaspectsofdiscomfortduringloadcarriage AT stephenjferguson validationofaninstrumenteddummytoassessmechanicalaspectsofdiscomfortduringloadcarriage AT rolfstampfli validationofaninstrumenteddummytoassessmechanicalaspectsofdiscomfortduringloadcarriage AT agnespsikuta validationofaninstrumenteddummytoassessmechanicalaspectsofdiscomfortduringloadcarriage AT renemrossi validationofaninstrumenteddummytoassessmechanicalaspectsofdiscomfortduringloadcarriage |