Model Evaluation and Uncertainty Analysis of PM2.5 Components over Pearl River Delta Region Using Monte Carlo Simulations
Abstract Sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, organic carbon (OC) and black carbon (BC) are the key components of PM2.5, but predicting their concentrations remains a challenge because of high uncertainties in the modeling. Employing the Nested Air Quality Prediction Modeling System (NAQPMS) developed by the...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Springer
2020-07-01
|
| Series: | Aerosol and Air Quality Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2020.02.0075 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Abstract Sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, organic carbon (OC) and black carbon (BC) are the key components of PM2.5, but predicting their concentrations remains a challenge because of high uncertainties in the modeling. Employing the Nested Air Quality Prediction Modeling System (NAQPMS) developed by the Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, this study investigated the uncertainties in Monte Carlo simulations of these aerosols in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region during 2015. 50 ensemble simulations with a 15 km horizontal resolution were derived by perturbing the emission data for sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, OC and BC from an emission inventory, which is one of the largest sources of uncertainty. Then, surface observations of these species collected from 10 sites across the region for 1 year were used to evaluate the performance of the ensemble simulations. The high correlation coefficients (> 0.74) and low mean biases (< 2 µg m−3) between the mean values of the ensemble and the observation data suggested that the model fairly accurately reproduced spatial and temporal variations in the nitrate, ammonium, OC and BC. However, the predicted sulfate concentrations, which displayed a correlation coefficient of 0.26, were far less reliable, particularly owing to the significant underestimation during winter. Further analysis revealed that uncertainties in the emission data explained most of the discrepancies for the OC and BC, but the mean biases for the sulfate and ammonium, especially during winter, probably stemmed from uncertainties in the heterogeneous reaction modeling. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1680-8584 2071-1409 |