Optimizing aortic arch branch cannulation in acute type A dissection surgery: a minimally invasive approach

BackgroundThe optimal cannulation strategy for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) surgery via a minimally invasive approach remains a topic of debate. This study aimed to compare the feasibility and safety of different aortic arch branch cannulation techniques using a single upper hemisternotomy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lin Xia, Ying Lyu, Xiong Xiao, Zhonglu Yang, Yuguang Ge, Bin Wang, Yu Liu, Hui Jiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1549736/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849727877563547648
author Lin Xia
Ying Lyu
Xiong Xiao
Zhonglu Yang
Yuguang Ge
Bin Wang
Yu Liu
Hui Jiang
author_facet Lin Xia
Ying Lyu
Xiong Xiao
Zhonglu Yang
Yuguang Ge
Bin Wang
Yu Liu
Hui Jiang
author_sort Lin Xia
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundThe optimal cannulation strategy for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) surgery via a minimally invasive approach remains a topic of debate. This study aimed to compare the feasibility and safety of different aortic arch branch cannulation techniques using a single upper hemisternotomy.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 207 patients with ATAAD who underwent total arch replacement combined with frozen elephant trunk techniques between December 2019 and July 2023. Patients were categorized into four groups based on the cannulation site: IA group (innominate artery, n = 174), LCA group (left carotid artery, n = 21), RSA group (right subclavian artery, n = 5), and RCA group (right carotid artery, n = 7). Perioperative outcomes, including mortality, complications, and operative times, were compared using appropriate statistical methods.ResultsA total of 207 patients were included and categorized into four groups based on the site of arterial cannulation: IA (n = 174), LCA (n = 21), RSA (n = 5), and RCA (n = 7). Baseline characteristics, including age and preoperative comorbidities, were comparable across the groups. Intraoperative metrics, such as cross-clamp time, circulatory arrest time, selective cerebral perfusion time, and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, showed no statistically significant differences. Although the CPB time was numerically shorter in the IA group, this difference was not significant (p > 0.05). Perioperative mortality occurred in 25 patients (12.1%), with no statistically significant differences among the groups (IA: 12.6%, LCA: 0%, RSA: 20.0%, RCA: 28.6%; p > 0.05). Postoperative clinical outcomes, including ventilator support duration, ICU stay, and hospital length of stay, were also similar across all groups.ConclusionAortic arch branch cannulation is a feasible and safe arterial perfusion strategy for ATAAD surgery via a minimally invasive single upper hemisternotomy. Among the options, the innominate artery demonstrated favorable outcomes and was not inferior to other arch vessels, and may be considered a suitable first choice when feasible.
format Article
id doaj-art-036baa69d9b14906bac8da6b40f7faec
institution DOAJ
issn 2297-055X
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
spelling doaj-art-036baa69d9b14906bac8da6b40f7faec2025-08-20T03:09:43ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2297-055X2025-05-011210.3389/fcvm.2025.15497361549736Optimizing aortic arch branch cannulation in acute type A dissection surgery: a minimally invasive approachLin Xia0Ying Lyu1Xiong Xiao2Zhonglu Yang3Yuguang Ge4Bin Wang5Yu Liu6Hui Jiang7Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, Liaoning, ChinaDepartment of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin, ChinaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, Liaoning, ChinaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, Liaoning, ChinaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, Liaoning, ChinaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, Liaoning, ChinaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, Liaoning, ChinaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, Liaoning, ChinaBackgroundThe optimal cannulation strategy for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) surgery via a minimally invasive approach remains a topic of debate. This study aimed to compare the feasibility and safety of different aortic arch branch cannulation techniques using a single upper hemisternotomy.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 207 patients with ATAAD who underwent total arch replacement combined with frozen elephant trunk techniques between December 2019 and July 2023. Patients were categorized into four groups based on the cannulation site: IA group (innominate artery, n = 174), LCA group (left carotid artery, n = 21), RSA group (right subclavian artery, n = 5), and RCA group (right carotid artery, n = 7). Perioperative outcomes, including mortality, complications, and operative times, were compared using appropriate statistical methods.ResultsA total of 207 patients were included and categorized into four groups based on the site of arterial cannulation: IA (n = 174), LCA (n = 21), RSA (n = 5), and RCA (n = 7). Baseline characteristics, including age and preoperative comorbidities, were comparable across the groups. Intraoperative metrics, such as cross-clamp time, circulatory arrest time, selective cerebral perfusion time, and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, showed no statistically significant differences. Although the CPB time was numerically shorter in the IA group, this difference was not significant (p > 0.05). Perioperative mortality occurred in 25 patients (12.1%), with no statistically significant differences among the groups (IA: 12.6%, LCA: 0%, RSA: 20.0%, RCA: 28.6%; p > 0.05). Postoperative clinical outcomes, including ventilator support duration, ICU stay, and hospital length of stay, were also similar across all groups.ConclusionAortic arch branch cannulation is a feasible and safe arterial perfusion strategy for ATAAD surgery via a minimally invasive single upper hemisternotomy. Among the options, the innominate artery demonstrated favorable outcomes and was not inferior to other arch vessels, and may be considered a suitable first choice when feasible.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1549736/fullacute type A aortic dissectionminimally invasive surgeryarterial cannulationaortic arch branch perfusionsingle upper hemisternotomy
spellingShingle Lin Xia
Ying Lyu
Xiong Xiao
Zhonglu Yang
Yuguang Ge
Bin Wang
Yu Liu
Hui Jiang
Optimizing aortic arch branch cannulation in acute type A dissection surgery: a minimally invasive approach
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
acute type A aortic dissection
minimally invasive surgery
arterial cannulation
aortic arch branch perfusion
single upper hemisternotomy
title Optimizing aortic arch branch cannulation in acute type A dissection surgery: a minimally invasive approach
title_full Optimizing aortic arch branch cannulation in acute type A dissection surgery: a minimally invasive approach
title_fullStr Optimizing aortic arch branch cannulation in acute type A dissection surgery: a minimally invasive approach
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing aortic arch branch cannulation in acute type A dissection surgery: a minimally invasive approach
title_short Optimizing aortic arch branch cannulation in acute type A dissection surgery: a minimally invasive approach
title_sort optimizing aortic arch branch cannulation in acute type a dissection surgery a minimally invasive approach
topic acute type A aortic dissection
minimally invasive surgery
arterial cannulation
aortic arch branch perfusion
single upper hemisternotomy
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1549736/full
work_keys_str_mv AT linxia optimizingaorticarchbranchcannulationinacutetypeadissectionsurgeryaminimallyinvasiveapproach
AT yinglyu optimizingaorticarchbranchcannulationinacutetypeadissectionsurgeryaminimallyinvasiveapproach
AT xiongxiao optimizingaorticarchbranchcannulationinacutetypeadissectionsurgeryaminimallyinvasiveapproach
AT zhongluyang optimizingaorticarchbranchcannulationinacutetypeadissectionsurgeryaminimallyinvasiveapproach
AT yuguangge optimizingaorticarchbranchcannulationinacutetypeadissectionsurgeryaminimallyinvasiveapproach
AT binwang optimizingaorticarchbranchcannulationinacutetypeadissectionsurgeryaminimallyinvasiveapproach
AT yuliu optimizingaorticarchbranchcannulationinacutetypeadissectionsurgeryaminimallyinvasiveapproach
AT huijiang optimizingaorticarchbranchcannulationinacutetypeadissectionsurgeryaminimallyinvasiveapproach