Effect of written corrective feedback in research writing competence of non-education students
This research addressed several key problems: the extent of use of teachers' feedback strategies, the effects of WCF on students' performance, and the significant correlation among the variables. A quantitative descriptive research design was used, and 153 participants were surveyed throu...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Academy of Cognitive and Natural Sciences
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Освітній вимір |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://acnsci.org/journal/index.php/ed/article/view/756 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841556255360942080 |
|---|---|
| author | Michelle Joy Gutierrez Sheila Mae Dabu Alcera Mary Joy Nest Lene Banogon Janice R. Carambas |
| author_facet | Michelle Joy Gutierrez Sheila Mae Dabu Alcera Mary Joy Nest Lene Banogon Janice R. Carambas |
| author_sort | Michelle Joy Gutierrez |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
This research addressed several key problems: the extent of use of teachers' feedback strategies, the effects of WCF on students' performance, and the significant correlation among the variables. A quantitative descriptive research design was used, and 153 participants were surveyed through the messenger platform and Google Forms. Research findings indicate that among the four types of written corrective feedback (WCF), direct feedback was the most frequently employed strategy by teachers, while focused feedback was the least utilised. Furthermore, results indicate that students value reflective learning facilitated by teachers' written corrective feedback, especially in error recognition and constructive feedback responses, as non-education students displayed positive attitudes toward receiving feedback. The study also revealed a positive correlation between WCF and research writing performance, regardless of age, gender, or degree program, with relatively low values at 0.022, 0.003, and 0.005, respectively, using partial eta squared. Additionally, significant correlations were observed between students' GPAs in research courses and the impact of WCF, revealing a disparity in GPAs between Research 1 and Research 2. As direct, unfocused, and indirect written corrective feedback showed a statistically significant relationship in the extent of use of teachers' written corrective feedback, focused feedback shows no significant correlation. The findings emphasise the importance of evaluating different written corrective feedback strategies to enhance students' research writing outcomes. Findings call for the strategic use of written corrective feedback based on the specified needs and level of performance of non-education students. Furthermore, students, teachers, and the institution are to work hand in hand to create a culture of continuous improvement of students in research writing and academic performance through written corrective feedback.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-036113ebe9054d79aa4816edd1ab5d1d |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2708-4604 2708-4612 |
| language | deu |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Academy of Cognitive and Natural Sciences |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Освітній вимір |
| spelling | doaj-art-036113ebe9054d79aa4816edd1ab5d1d2025-01-07T09:55:53ZdeuAcademy of Cognitive and Natural SciencesОсвітній вимір2708-46042708-46122024-12-011110.55056/ed.756Effect of written corrective feedback in research writing competence of non-education studentsMichelle Joy Gutierrez0Sheila Mae Dabu1Alcera Mary Joy2Nest Lene Banogon3Janice R. Carambas4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1937-5991Pangasinan State UniversityPangasinan State UniversityPangasinan State UniversityPangasinan State UniversityPangasinan State University This research addressed several key problems: the extent of use of teachers' feedback strategies, the effects of WCF on students' performance, and the significant correlation among the variables. A quantitative descriptive research design was used, and 153 participants were surveyed through the messenger platform and Google Forms. Research findings indicate that among the four types of written corrective feedback (WCF), direct feedback was the most frequently employed strategy by teachers, while focused feedback was the least utilised. Furthermore, results indicate that students value reflective learning facilitated by teachers' written corrective feedback, especially in error recognition and constructive feedback responses, as non-education students displayed positive attitudes toward receiving feedback. The study also revealed a positive correlation between WCF and research writing performance, regardless of age, gender, or degree program, with relatively low values at 0.022, 0.003, and 0.005, respectively, using partial eta squared. Additionally, significant correlations were observed between students' GPAs in research courses and the impact of WCF, revealing a disparity in GPAs between Research 1 and Research 2. As direct, unfocused, and indirect written corrective feedback showed a statistically significant relationship in the extent of use of teachers' written corrective feedback, focused feedback shows no significant correlation. The findings emphasise the importance of evaluating different written corrective feedback strategies to enhance students' research writing outcomes. Findings call for the strategic use of written corrective feedback based on the specified needs and level of performance of non-education students. Furthermore, students, teachers, and the institution are to work hand in hand to create a culture of continuous improvement of students in research writing and academic performance through written corrective feedback. https://acnsci.org/journal/index.php/ed/article/view/756written corrective feedbackresearch writingnon-education students |
| spellingShingle | Michelle Joy Gutierrez Sheila Mae Dabu Alcera Mary Joy Nest Lene Banogon Janice R. Carambas Effect of written corrective feedback in research writing competence of non-education students Освітній вимір written corrective feedback research writing non-education students |
| title | Effect of written corrective feedback in research writing competence of non-education students |
| title_full | Effect of written corrective feedback in research writing competence of non-education students |
| title_fullStr | Effect of written corrective feedback in research writing competence of non-education students |
| title_full_unstemmed | Effect of written corrective feedback in research writing competence of non-education students |
| title_short | Effect of written corrective feedback in research writing competence of non-education students |
| title_sort | effect of written corrective feedback in research writing competence of non education students |
| topic | written corrective feedback research writing non-education students |
| url | https://acnsci.org/journal/index.php/ed/article/view/756 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT michellejoygutierrez effectofwrittencorrectivefeedbackinresearchwritingcompetenceofnoneducationstudents AT sheilamaedabu effectofwrittencorrectivefeedbackinresearchwritingcompetenceofnoneducationstudents AT alceramaryjoy effectofwrittencorrectivefeedbackinresearchwritingcompetenceofnoneducationstudents AT nestlenebanogon effectofwrittencorrectivefeedbackinresearchwritingcompetenceofnoneducationstudents AT janicercarambas effectofwrittencorrectivefeedbackinresearchwritingcompetenceofnoneducationstudents |