Ranking of treatments in network meta-analysis: incorporating minimally important differences
Abstract Background In network meta-analysis (NMA), the magnitude of difference between treatment effects is typically ignored in the calculation of ranking metrics, such as probability best and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRAs). This leads to treatment rankings which may not refle...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Tristan Curteis, Augustine Wigle, Christopher J. Michaels, Adriani Nikolakopoulou |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2025-03-01
|
| Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02499-0 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Minimal important differences of measurement instruments used in rheumatoid arthritis: a scoping review
by: Sally Yaacoub, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01) -
Meaningful to whom? Minimal clinically important differences and the priorities of individuals living with dementia for everyday function
by: Andrea Gilmore‐Bykovskyi, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
The minimal clinically important difference of the Participation Measurement Scale in chronic stroke
by: Oyéné Kossi, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Minimal important changes of HFS-30 and HFS-7 questionnaires for patients with hemifacial spasm
by: Weerawat Saengphatrachai, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Rhinoseptoplasty: functional and aesthetical satisfaction after 1 year A prospective study
by: Mónica Teixeira, et al.
Published: (2024-09-01)