Formulation of Plithogenic Hypotheses to Evaluate the Viability of the Right of Recourse in Ecuador

The purpose of the research is to assess the viability of the right of recourse in Ecuador by creating neutrosophic plithogenic hypotheses with respect to uncertain results and conflicting trends in determining public officials' liability for their patrimony in order to publicly establish a rel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ambar Murillo Mena, Humberto Gosálbez-Pequeño, Fidel Márquez-Sánchez, Holger García- Segarra, Óscar José Alejo Machado
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of New Mexico 2025-05-01
Series:Neutrosophic Sets and Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://fs.unm.edu/NSS/61.%20PlithogenicHypothesesViability.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849225449442377728
author Ambar Murillo Mena
Humberto Gosálbez-Pequeño
Fidel Márquez-Sánchez
Holger García- Segarra
Óscar José Alejo Machado
author_facet Ambar Murillo Mena
Humberto Gosálbez-Pequeño
Fidel Márquez-Sánchez
Holger García- Segarra
Óscar José Alejo Machado
author_sort Ambar Murillo Mena
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of the research is to assess the viability of the right of recourse in Ecuador by creating neutrosophic plithogenic hypotheses with respect to uncertain results and conflicting trends in determining public officials' liability for their patrimony in order to publicly establish a reliable assessment of an objective relative to improving recourse of public assets for injuries caused by dolus and culpa gravis. The investigation is descriptive, founded upon neutrosophic plithogenic philosophy which allows for hypothesis generation with truths, falsities, and uncertainties. Through an analysis of national court cases which determine the viability of recourse for the years 2008-2018 in Ecuador and patterns of prediction in Argentina and Chile, all qualitative findings, as well as neutrosophic mathematics techniques relative to uncertainty, are assessed in a quantitative manner. Ultimately, the researchers conclude that the right of recourse is inviable to an extent but for reasons not associated with establishing state accountability; rather, the uncertainty with dolus determination and the frequency of statutes of limitations are to blame. 70% of cases go unresolved due to uncertainty. Thus, through the neutrosophic plithogenic hypotheses generated, the right of recourse is viable to a certain extent but with limitations, setting implications for more precise legality and judicial training to foster the recourse and state accountability and restitution efforts in Ecuador.
format Article
id doaj-art-0318f90ed1df4575a4ee902ff55d2df9
institution Kabale University
issn 2331-6055
2331-608X
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher University of New Mexico
record_format Article
series Neutrosophic Sets and Systems
spelling doaj-art-0318f90ed1df4575a4ee902ff55d2df92025-08-24T18:03:47ZengUniversity of New MexicoNeutrosophic Sets and Systems2331-60552331-608X2025-05-0184755766Formulation of Plithogenic Hypotheses to Evaluate the Viability of the Right of Recourse in EcuadorAmbar Murillo MenaHumberto Gosálbez-PequeñoFidel Márquez-SánchezHolger García- SegarraÓscar José Alejo MachadoThe purpose of the research is to assess the viability of the right of recourse in Ecuador by creating neutrosophic plithogenic hypotheses with respect to uncertain results and conflicting trends in determining public officials' liability for their patrimony in order to publicly establish a reliable assessment of an objective relative to improving recourse of public assets for injuries caused by dolus and culpa gravis. The investigation is descriptive, founded upon neutrosophic plithogenic philosophy which allows for hypothesis generation with truths, falsities, and uncertainties. Through an analysis of national court cases which determine the viability of recourse for the years 2008-2018 in Ecuador and patterns of prediction in Argentina and Chile, all qualitative findings, as well as neutrosophic mathematics techniques relative to uncertainty, are assessed in a quantitative manner. Ultimately, the researchers conclude that the right of recourse is inviable to an extent but for reasons not associated with establishing state accountability; rather, the uncertainty with dolus determination and the frequency of statutes of limitations are to blame. 70% of cases go unresolved due to uncertainty. Thus, through the neutrosophic plithogenic hypotheses generated, the right of recourse is viable to a certain extent but with limitations, setting implications for more precise legality and judicial training to foster the recourse and state accountability and restitution efforts in Ecuador. https://fs.unm.edu/NSS/61.%20PlithogenicHypothesesViability.pdfright of recourseplithogenic hypothesisneutrosophicpatrimonial liabilityecuador
spellingShingle Ambar Murillo Mena
Humberto Gosálbez-Pequeño
Fidel Márquez-Sánchez
Holger García- Segarra
Óscar José Alejo Machado
Formulation of Plithogenic Hypotheses to Evaluate the Viability of the Right of Recourse in Ecuador
Neutrosophic Sets and Systems
right of recourse
plithogenic hypothesis
neutrosophic
patrimonial liability
ecuador
title Formulation of Plithogenic Hypotheses to Evaluate the Viability of the Right of Recourse in Ecuador
title_full Formulation of Plithogenic Hypotheses to Evaluate the Viability of the Right of Recourse in Ecuador
title_fullStr Formulation of Plithogenic Hypotheses to Evaluate the Viability of the Right of Recourse in Ecuador
title_full_unstemmed Formulation of Plithogenic Hypotheses to Evaluate the Viability of the Right of Recourse in Ecuador
title_short Formulation of Plithogenic Hypotheses to Evaluate the Viability of the Right of Recourse in Ecuador
title_sort formulation of plithogenic hypotheses to evaluate the viability of the right of recourse in ecuador
topic right of recourse
plithogenic hypothesis
neutrosophic
patrimonial liability
ecuador
url https://fs.unm.edu/NSS/61.%20PlithogenicHypothesesViability.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ambarmurillomena formulationofplithogenichypothesestoevaluatetheviabilityoftherightofrecourseinecuador
AT humbertogosalbezpequeno formulationofplithogenichypothesestoevaluatetheviabilityoftherightofrecourseinecuador
AT fidelmarquezsanchez formulationofplithogenichypothesestoevaluatetheviabilityoftherightofrecourseinecuador
AT holgergarciasegarra formulationofplithogenichypothesestoevaluatetheviabilityoftherightofrecourseinecuador
AT oscarjosealejomachado formulationofplithogenichypothesestoevaluatetheviabilityoftherightofrecourseinecuador