Evaluation and Comparison of the Academic Quality of Open-Access Mega Journals and Authoritative Journals: Disruptive Innovation Evaluation
BackgroundSome scholars who are skeptical about open-access mega journals (OAMJs) have argued that low-quality papers are often difficult to publish in more prestigious and authoritative journals, and OAMJs may be their main destination. ObjectiveThis study aims t...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Yuyan Jiang, Xue-li Liu, Liyun Wang |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| Online Access: | https://www.jmir.org/2025/1/e59598 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Academic communities: The role of journals and open-access mega-journals in scholarly communication
by: S. Wakeling, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01) -
Academic communities: The role of journals and open-access mega-journals in scholarly communication
by: S. Wakeling, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01) -
Are Nature Index journals a valid basis for academic assessment: a study of academic impact and disruptive innovation assessment based on open bibliographic metadata and citation data
by: Yuyan Jiang, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01) -
Tungs’ Medical Journal is indexed in the Directory of Open Access Journals
by: Min-Che Tung, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Academic Quality or Commercial Concern? The Role of APCs in Open-Access Communication Studies Journals
by: Burak Ili
Published: (2025-02-01)