Five principles to prioritise in small-scale surgical quality improvement: a qualitative study of the views of surgical improvement leaders
Objective Variations in the quality and safety of surgical care remain persistent. Efforts to improve are needed, but are themselves variably effective, with often disappointing impacts. When compared with large-scale, multisite and better resourced improvement efforts, the evidence base for small-s...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Mary Dixon-Woods, Graham Martin, Alessandra Giusti, Clifford Y Ko |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2025-01-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open Quality |
Online Access: | https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/1/e002917.full |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Design and Evaluation of a Leader–Follower Isomorphic Vascular Interventional Surgical Robot
by: Pengfei Chen, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Lung Cancer: Physiological Principles and Clinical Utilization in Surgical and Non-surgical Settings
by: Marco Cascella, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Surgical Treatment for Profunda Femoris Artery Aneurysms: Five Case Reports
by: Kimihiro Igari, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01) -
Post-surgical complications in patients operated of craniosynostosis. Five year study
by: Miguel Angel Cruz Díaz, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01) -
THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS-NATIONAL SURGICAL QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CALCULATOR AND SURGICAL APGAR AS PREDICTORS OF POST-CHOLECYSTECTOMY COMPLICATIONS
by: Diana Tejeda-Herrera, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01)