Evolving perspectives on aortic stenosis: the increasing importance of evaluating the right ventricle before aortic valve intervention

Aortic stenosis (AS) was historically considered a disease of the left side of the heart, with the main pathophysiological impact being predominantly on the left ventricle (LV). However, progressive pressure overload in AS can initiate a cascade of extra-valvular myocardial remodeling that could als...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vitaliy Androshchuk, Omar Chehab, Joshua Wilcox, Benedict McDonaugh, Natalie Montarello, Ronak Rajani, Bernard Prendergast, Tiffany Patterson, Simon Redwood
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1506993/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aortic stenosis (AS) was historically considered a disease of the left side of the heart, with the main pathophysiological impact being predominantly on the left ventricle (LV). However, progressive pressure overload in AS can initiate a cascade of extra-valvular myocardial remodeling that could also precipitate maladaptive alterations in the structure and function of the right ventricle (RV). The haemodynamic and clinical importance of these changes in patients with AS have been largely underappreciated in the past. Contemporary data indicates that RV dilatation or impairment identifies the AS patients who are at increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes after aortic valve replacement (AVR). It is now increasingly recognised that effective quantitative assessment of the RV plays a key role in delineating the late clinical stage of AS, which could improve patient risk stratification. Despite the increasing emphasis on the pathological significance of RV changes in AS, it remains to be established if earlier detection of these changes can improve the timing for intervention. This review will summarise the features of normal RV physiology and the mechanisms responsible for RV impairment in AS. In addition, we will discuss the multimodality approach to the comprehensive assessment of RV size, function and mechanics in AS patients. Finally, we will review the emerging evidence reinforcing the negative impact of RV dysfunction on clinical outcomes in AS patients treated with AVR.
ISSN:2297-055X