PREVENTIVE MEASURES - EXCEPTION TO THE PRINCIPLE OF THE RIGHT TO LIBERTY AND SECURITY
Considering the specific obligations arising from the exercise of criminal action and civil action in criminal proceedings and taking into account the need to ensure a better conduct of activities that are undertaken in solving criminal cases, it sometimes appears necessary, taking certain procedura...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House
2016-05-01
|
| Series: | Challenges of the Knowledge Society |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://cks.univnt.ro/uploads/cks_2016_articles/index.php?dir=01_criminal_law%2F&download=CKS+2016_criminal_law_art.007.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846095626935205888 |
|---|---|
| author | Marin-Alin DĂNILĂ |
| author_facet | Marin-Alin DĂNILĂ |
| author_sort | Marin-Alin DĂNILĂ |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Considering the specific obligations arising from the exercise of criminal action and civil action in criminal proceedings and taking into account the need to ensure a better conduct of activities that are undertaken in solving criminal cases, it sometimes appears necessary, taking certain procedural measures. Procedural measures were defined [1] as institutions available for criminal procedural law and criminal judicial bodies consisting of privations or certain constraints, real or personal, of the conditions and circumstances under which the criminal proceedings are being realized. By the function pursued by the legislature, these measures work as a legal means of prevention or suppression of circumstances or situations likely to jeopardize the effectiveness of the criminal proceedings through the obstacles, difficulties and confusion which they can produce [2]. Procedural measures arise as opportunities, but not being specific to any criminal case, judicial bodies take measures according to the specific circumstances of each criminal case. From this derives the adjacent character of the criminal procedural measures to the main job [3]. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-026a1cbc3c664f959b457729a60e7cfe |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2068-7796 2068-7796 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2016-05-01 |
| publisher | Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Challenges of the Knowledge Society |
| spelling | doaj-art-026a1cbc3c664f959b457729a60e7cfe2025-01-02T09:51:33ZengNicolae Titulescu University Publishing HouseChallenges of the Knowledge Society2068-77962068-77962016-05-016-3943PREVENTIVE MEASURES - EXCEPTION TO THE PRINCIPLE OF THE RIGHT TO LIBERTY AND SECURITYMarin-Alin DĂNILĂ0Faculty of Law, „Nicolae Titulescu” University of BucharestConsidering the specific obligations arising from the exercise of criminal action and civil action in criminal proceedings and taking into account the need to ensure a better conduct of activities that are undertaken in solving criminal cases, it sometimes appears necessary, taking certain procedural measures. Procedural measures were defined [1] as institutions available for criminal procedural law and criminal judicial bodies consisting of privations or certain constraints, real or personal, of the conditions and circumstances under which the criminal proceedings are being realized. By the function pursued by the legislature, these measures work as a legal means of prevention or suppression of circumstances or situations likely to jeopardize the effectiveness of the criminal proceedings through the obstacles, difficulties and confusion which they can produce [2]. Procedural measures arise as opportunities, but not being specific to any criminal case, judicial bodies take measures according to the specific circumstances of each criminal case. From this derives the adjacent character of the criminal procedural measures to the main job [3].http://cks.univnt.ro/uploads/cks_2016_articles/index.php?dir=01_criminal_law%2F&download=CKS+2016_criminal_law_art.007.pdfprocedural measureslegislatorcoercionsuspectfundamental values. |
| spellingShingle | Marin-Alin DĂNILĂ PREVENTIVE MEASURES - EXCEPTION TO THE PRINCIPLE OF THE RIGHT TO LIBERTY AND SECURITY Challenges of the Knowledge Society procedural measures legislator coercion suspect fundamental values. |
| title | PREVENTIVE MEASURES - EXCEPTION TO THE PRINCIPLE OF THE RIGHT TO LIBERTY AND SECURITY |
| title_full | PREVENTIVE MEASURES - EXCEPTION TO THE PRINCIPLE OF THE RIGHT TO LIBERTY AND SECURITY |
| title_fullStr | PREVENTIVE MEASURES - EXCEPTION TO THE PRINCIPLE OF THE RIGHT TO LIBERTY AND SECURITY |
| title_full_unstemmed | PREVENTIVE MEASURES - EXCEPTION TO THE PRINCIPLE OF THE RIGHT TO LIBERTY AND SECURITY |
| title_short | PREVENTIVE MEASURES - EXCEPTION TO THE PRINCIPLE OF THE RIGHT TO LIBERTY AND SECURITY |
| title_sort | preventive measures exception to the principle of the right to liberty and security |
| topic | procedural measures legislator coercion suspect fundamental values. |
| url | http://cks.univnt.ro/uploads/cks_2016_articles/index.php?dir=01_criminal_law%2F&download=CKS+2016_criminal_law_art.007.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT marinalindanila preventivemeasuresexceptiontotheprincipleoftherighttolibertyandsecurity |