The comparative macroanatomfc researches oıı bones of yving (ossea alaej in rock partridges (a. graectı) and pheasants (p. colchicus)

The purpose of this study is to determine the macroanatomy of humerus, radius, ulna, ossa carpi, carpometacarpus and ossa digitorum manus forming bones ol wing in rock partridges and rigneck pheasant and to compare the differences between them. In this research, 10 rock partridges and 10 rigneck phe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sefa Lök, Hakan Yalçın
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Selcuk University Press
Series:Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eurasianjvetsci.org/pdf.php3?id=45
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841561384122318848
author Sefa Lök
Hakan Yalçın
author_facet Sefa Lök
Hakan Yalçın
author_sort Sefa Lök
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of this study is to determine the macroanatomy of humerus, radius, ulna, ossa carpi, carpometacarpus and ossa digitorum manus forming bones ol wing in rock partridges and rigneck pheasant and to compare the differences between them. In this research, 10 rock partridges and 10 rigneck pheasant, ten weeks old, were used. Length measures and definite anatomic formations were determined. Humerus was in a pneumatic structure in both species. Partridges measures ol all bone length were always lower than pheasants measures. In all partridges, formations of impressio coracobrachialis and fossa penumotricipitalis at the level o) humerus proximal were observed as a deeper structure, in all pheasants, radius had more evident external curve than the the radius in partridges, but. in contrast, the inclination to outward of ulna was more definite in partridges. Os carpi radiale of the pheasants was a disordered guadrangle or like a bow-tie. In all pheasants and partridges, it was determined that 1. finger consists of one phalanx, 2. tinger consists of two phalanxes and 3. finger consists ol one phalanx. In conclusion, when partridges and pheasants bone ol wing are compared whit other bird species, evident differences wore determined. It was observed that there were some macroanatomic differences between partridges and pheasants.
format Article
id doaj-art-0263153d2a974189a5d40833dec911fe
institution Kabale University
issn 1309-6958
2146-1953
language English
publisher Selcuk University Press
record_format Article
series Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences
spelling doaj-art-0263153d2a974189a5d40833dec911fe2025-01-03T01:36:25ZengSelcuk University PressEurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences1309-69582146-1953232859445The comparative macroanatomfc researches oıı bones of yving (ossea alaej in rock partridges (a. graectı) and pheasants (p. colchicus)Sefa Lök0Hakan Yalçın1Karamanoğlu Mehmet Hey Üniversitesi, Besyo, KARAMANSelçuk Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi, Anatomi Kampüs, KONYAThe purpose of this study is to determine the macroanatomy of humerus, radius, ulna, ossa carpi, carpometacarpus and ossa digitorum manus forming bones ol wing in rock partridges and rigneck pheasant and to compare the differences between them. In this research, 10 rock partridges and 10 rigneck pheasant, ten weeks old, were used. Length measures and definite anatomic formations were determined. Humerus was in a pneumatic structure in both species. Partridges measures ol all bone length were always lower than pheasants measures. In all partridges, formations of impressio coracobrachialis and fossa penumotricipitalis at the level o) humerus proximal were observed as a deeper structure, in all pheasants, radius had more evident external curve than the the radius in partridges, but. in contrast, the inclination to outward of ulna was more definite in partridges. Os carpi radiale of the pheasants was a disordered guadrangle or like a bow-tie. In all pheasants and partridges, it was determined that 1. finger consists of one phalanx, 2. tinger consists of two phalanxes and 3. finger consists ol one phalanx. In conclusion, when partridges and pheasants bone ol wing are compared whit other bird species, evident differences wore determined. It was observed that there were some macroanatomic differences between partridges and pheasants.http://eurasianjvetsci.org/pdf.php3?id=45partridgepheasantanatomybonewing
spellingShingle Sefa Lök
Hakan Yalçın
The comparative macroanatomfc researches oıı bones of yving (ossea alaej in rock partridges (a. graectı) and pheasants (p. colchicus)
Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences
partridge
pheasant
anatomy
bone
wing
title The comparative macroanatomfc researches oıı bones of yving (ossea alaej in rock partridges (a. graectı) and pheasants (p. colchicus)
title_full The comparative macroanatomfc researches oıı bones of yving (ossea alaej in rock partridges (a. graectı) and pheasants (p. colchicus)
title_fullStr The comparative macroanatomfc researches oıı bones of yving (ossea alaej in rock partridges (a. graectı) and pheasants (p. colchicus)
title_full_unstemmed The comparative macroanatomfc researches oıı bones of yving (ossea alaej in rock partridges (a. graectı) and pheasants (p. colchicus)
title_short The comparative macroanatomfc researches oıı bones of yving (ossea alaej in rock partridges (a. graectı) and pheasants (p. colchicus)
title_sort comparative macroanatomfc researches oii bones of yving ossea alaej in rock partridges a graecti and pheasants p colchicus
topic partridge
pheasant
anatomy
bone
wing
url http://eurasianjvetsci.org/pdf.php3?id=45
work_keys_str_mv AT sefalok thecomparativemacroanatomfcresearchesoııbonesofyvingosseaalaejinrockpartridgesagraectıandpheasantspcolchicus
AT hakanyalcın thecomparativemacroanatomfcresearchesoııbonesofyvingosseaalaejinrockpartridgesagraectıandpheasantspcolchicus
AT sefalok comparativemacroanatomfcresearchesoııbonesofyvingosseaalaejinrockpartridgesagraectıandpheasantspcolchicus
AT hakanyalcın comparativemacroanatomfcresearchesoııbonesofyvingosseaalaejinrockpartridgesagraectıandpheasantspcolchicus