Borehole‐Based Interval Kriging for 3D Lithofacies Modeling

Abstract Developing a three‐dimensional (3D) lithofacies model from boreholes is critical for providing a coherent understanding of complex subsurface geology, which is essential for groundwater studies. This study aims to introduce a new geostatistical method—interval kriging—to efficiently conduct...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuqi Song, Frank T.‐C. Tsai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-06-01
Series:Water Resources Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035020
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850115800900304896
author Yuqi Song
Frank T.‐C. Tsai
author_facet Yuqi Song
Frank T.‐C. Tsai
author_sort Yuqi Song
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Developing a three‐dimensional (3D) lithofacies model from boreholes is critical for providing a coherent understanding of complex subsurface geology, which is essential for groundwater studies. This study aims to introduce a new geostatistical method—interval kriging—to efficiently conduct 3D borehole‐based lithological modeling with sand/non‐sand binary indicators. Interval kriging is a best linear unbiased estimator for irregular interval supports. Interval kriging considers 3D anisotropies between two orthogonal components—a horizontal plane and a vertical axis. A new 3D interval semivariogram is developed. To cope with the nonconvexity of estimation variance, the minimization of estimation variance is regulated with an additional regularization term. The minimization problem is solved by a global‐local genetic algorithm embedded with quadratic programming and Brent's method to obtain kriging weights and kriging length. Four numerical and real‐world case studies demonstrate that interval kriging is more computationally efficient than 3D kriging because the covariance matrix is largely reduced without sacrificing borehole data. Moreover, interval kriging produces more realistic geologic characteristics than 2.5D kriging, while conditional to spatial borehole data. Compared to the multiple‐point statistics (MPS) algorithm—SNESIM, interval kriging can reproduce the geological architecture and spatial connectivity of channel‐type features, meanwhile producing tabular‐type features with better connectivity. Because the regularization term constrains kriged value toward 0 or 1, interval kriging produces more certainty in sand/non‐sand classification than 2.5D kriging, 3D kriging, and SNESIM. In conclusion, interval kriging is an effective and efficient 3D geostatistical algorithm that can capture the 3D structural complexity while significantly reducing computational time.
format Article
id doaj-art-024fc79b366f4a74922bcb5f79d2ea9e
institution OA Journals
issn 0043-1397
1944-7973
language English
publishDate 2024-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Water Resources Research
spelling doaj-art-024fc79b366f4a74922bcb5f79d2ea9e2025-08-20T02:36:30ZengWileyWater Resources Research0043-13971944-79732024-06-01606n/an/a10.1029/2023WR035020Borehole‐Based Interval Kriging for 3D Lithofacies ModelingYuqi Song0Frank T.‐C. Tsai1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Louisiana State University Baton Rouge LA USADepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering Louisiana State University Baton Rouge LA USAAbstract Developing a three‐dimensional (3D) lithofacies model from boreholes is critical for providing a coherent understanding of complex subsurface geology, which is essential for groundwater studies. This study aims to introduce a new geostatistical method—interval kriging—to efficiently conduct 3D borehole‐based lithological modeling with sand/non‐sand binary indicators. Interval kriging is a best linear unbiased estimator for irregular interval supports. Interval kriging considers 3D anisotropies between two orthogonal components—a horizontal plane and a vertical axis. A new 3D interval semivariogram is developed. To cope with the nonconvexity of estimation variance, the minimization of estimation variance is regulated with an additional regularization term. The minimization problem is solved by a global‐local genetic algorithm embedded with quadratic programming and Brent's method to obtain kriging weights and kriging length. Four numerical and real‐world case studies demonstrate that interval kriging is more computationally efficient than 3D kriging because the covariance matrix is largely reduced without sacrificing borehole data. Moreover, interval kriging produces more realistic geologic characteristics than 2.5D kriging, while conditional to spatial borehole data. Compared to the multiple‐point statistics (MPS) algorithm—SNESIM, interval kriging can reproduce the geological architecture and spatial connectivity of channel‐type features, meanwhile producing tabular‐type features with better connectivity. Because the regularization term constrains kriged value toward 0 or 1, interval kriging produces more certainty in sand/non‐sand classification than 2.5D kriging, 3D kriging, and SNESIM. In conclusion, interval kriging is an effective and efficient 3D geostatistical algorithm that can capture the 3D structural complexity while significantly reducing computational time.https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035020interval kriginginterval semivariogramirregular supportanisotropyglobal‐local embedded genetic algorithmlithofacies modeling
spellingShingle Yuqi Song
Frank T.‐C. Tsai
Borehole‐Based Interval Kriging for 3D Lithofacies Modeling
Water Resources Research
interval kriging
interval semivariogram
irregular support
anisotropy
global‐local embedded genetic algorithm
lithofacies modeling
title Borehole‐Based Interval Kriging for 3D Lithofacies Modeling
title_full Borehole‐Based Interval Kriging for 3D Lithofacies Modeling
title_fullStr Borehole‐Based Interval Kriging for 3D Lithofacies Modeling
title_full_unstemmed Borehole‐Based Interval Kriging for 3D Lithofacies Modeling
title_short Borehole‐Based Interval Kriging for 3D Lithofacies Modeling
title_sort borehole based interval kriging for 3d lithofacies modeling
topic interval kriging
interval semivariogram
irregular support
anisotropy
global‐local embedded genetic algorithm
lithofacies modeling
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035020
work_keys_str_mv AT yuqisong boreholebasedintervalkrigingfor3dlithofaciesmodeling
AT franktctsai boreholebasedintervalkrigingfor3dlithofaciesmodeling