The rationality of the punishment ladder: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

Abstract As implementing a punishment ladder is an important way of establishing a balance between crime and punishment, the task of investigating the scientific and rational nature of the punishment ladder is highly significant. This paper explores the rationality of the punishment ladder employed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ke Jiang, Fang Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Nature 2025-06-01
Series:Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05073-7
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850223903362777088
author Ke Jiang
Fang Wang
author_facet Ke Jiang
Fang Wang
author_sort Ke Jiang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract As implementing a punishment ladder is an important way of establishing a balance between crime and punishment, the task of investigating the scientific and rational nature of the punishment ladder is highly significant. This paper explores the rationality of the punishment ladder employed in the context of the crime of infringing upon citizens’ personal information. Specifically, this research employs methods such as regression discontinuity design. The results reveal that after a judicial interpretation in 2017 defined the amount of information corresponding to different circumstances surrounding this crime, a significant discontinuity pertaining to fixed-term imprisonment sentences emerged at the threshold of the amount of information. This finding suggests the penalties associated with the different ladders of punishment used in this context are insufficiently connected, thus standing in contrast to the principle of a balance between crime and punishment. Furthermore, the larger the amount of information is, the lower the penalty per unit of information. This finding suggests that the threshold has a strong deterrent effect; however, once this threshold is crossed, the deterrent effect becomes sharply weaker, and no gradual deterrent ladder has yet been developed. Therefore, we suggest that the amount of information that corresponds to different circumstances of the crime should overlap with the aim of weakening the decisive role played by the threshold in this context. In addition, we recommend that larger quantities of information should be combined with more severe fines with the goal of ensuring that the purpose of punishment is achieved.
format Article
id doaj-art-024c08203b20484e987041d6e9fb96bd
institution OA Journals
issn 2662-9992
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Springer Nature
record_format Article
series Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
spelling doaj-art-024c08203b20484e987041d6e9fb96bd2025-08-20T02:05:47ZengSpringer NatureHumanities & Social Sciences Communications2662-99922025-06-0112111510.1057/s41599-025-05073-7The rationality of the punishment ladder: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in ChinaKe Jiang0Fang Wang1Data Science Institute, Shandong UniversityData Science Institute, Shandong UniversityAbstract As implementing a punishment ladder is an important way of establishing a balance between crime and punishment, the task of investigating the scientific and rational nature of the punishment ladder is highly significant. This paper explores the rationality of the punishment ladder employed in the context of the crime of infringing upon citizens’ personal information. Specifically, this research employs methods such as regression discontinuity design. The results reveal that after a judicial interpretation in 2017 defined the amount of information corresponding to different circumstances surrounding this crime, a significant discontinuity pertaining to fixed-term imprisonment sentences emerged at the threshold of the amount of information. This finding suggests the penalties associated with the different ladders of punishment used in this context are insufficiently connected, thus standing in contrast to the principle of a balance between crime and punishment. Furthermore, the larger the amount of information is, the lower the penalty per unit of information. This finding suggests that the threshold has a strong deterrent effect; however, once this threshold is crossed, the deterrent effect becomes sharply weaker, and no gradual deterrent ladder has yet been developed. Therefore, we suggest that the amount of information that corresponds to different circumstances of the crime should overlap with the aim of weakening the decisive role played by the threshold in this context. In addition, we recommend that larger quantities of information should be combined with more severe fines with the goal of ensuring that the purpose of punishment is achieved.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05073-7
spellingShingle Ke Jiang
Fang Wang
The rationality of the punishment ladder: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
title The rationality of the punishment ladder: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
title_full The rationality of the punishment ladder: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
title_fullStr The rationality of the punishment ladder: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
title_full_unstemmed The rationality of the punishment ladder: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
title_short The rationality of the punishment ladder: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
title_sort rationality of the punishment ladder evidence from a quasi natural experiment in china
url https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05073-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kejiang therationalityofthepunishmentladderevidencefromaquasinaturalexperimentinchina
AT fangwang therationalityofthepunishmentladderevidencefromaquasinaturalexperimentinchina
AT kejiang rationalityofthepunishmentladderevidencefromaquasinaturalexperimentinchina
AT fangwang rationalityofthepunishmentladderevidencefromaquasinaturalexperimentinchina