Rhetoric by Avistotel: a Legal View

Analysis of any phenomenon, which is far from the researcher for thousands years, in the light of this or that department of knowledge, highlights one and obscures another, prefers one over another. It happened to the rhetoric which was snatched by philology and neglected by lawyers. Although nowada...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: K. Kh. Rekosh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MGIMO University Press 2015-06-01
Series:Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/376
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832579383062167552
author K. Kh. Rekosh
author_facet K. Kh. Rekosh
author_sort K. Kh. Rekosh
collection DOAJ
description Analysis of any phenomenon, which is far from the researcher for thousands years, in the light of this or that department of knowledge, highlights one and obscures another, prefers one over another. It happened to the rhetoric which was snatched by philology and neglected by lawyers. Although nowadays it is natural that the same phenomena are studied by different Sciences, the ancient rhetoric is looked at by most researchers as the art of philology. But the approach by Aristotle, in his Rhetoric, was legal rather than linguistic. Among the Aristotle's 4 requirements concerning good style (correctness, clarity, relevance and eloquence) eloquence is only % and the % are closer to the law. Rhetoric has incorporated all the features of linguistic mechanisms and gave them to the law. The law perceived moral and ethical ideas: the good justice, virtue, ritual, law and techniques of philology and persuasion, among which the main one is syllogism already used in the dialectic, the main logic principle of legal reasoning. Towards the past, rhetoric is parallel to dialectic, but dialectic is focused on one person or on the speaker, and rhetoric aims at the audience, the first one tries to convince himself and the second tries to convince the audience and in this role rhetoric is linked with the law. As far as the evolution of law is concerned, instead of legal technique there was rhetoric (especially in its methodological form, defined by Aristotle), which can be considered as a step towards creating the law as a design in ancient Greece. It is proved by a comparison of the ancient institution of judicial process and judicial speeches with modern legal technicalities, which shows that the legal machinery embraced the principles of "rhetorical" technique. The methodological nature of the rhetoric by Aristotle is usually overlooked by linguists and lawyers.
format Article
id doaj-art-01e36f8677dd466097bb677e26ac69ef
institution Kabale University
issn 2071-8160
2541-9099
language English
publishDate 2015-06-01
publisher MGIMO University Press
record_format Article
series Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
spelling doaj-art-01e36f8677dd466097bb677e26ac69ef2025-01-30T12:16:13ZengMGIMO University PressVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta2071-81602541-90992015-06-0103(42)24424910.24833/2071-8160-2015-3-42-244-249376Rhetoric by Avistotel: a Legal ViewK. Kh. Rekosh0Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)Analysis of any phenomenon, which is far from the researcher for thousands years, in the light of this or that department of knowledge, highlights one and obscures another, prefers one over another. It happened to the rhetoric which was snatched by philology and neglected by lawyers. Although nowadays it is natural that the same phenomena are studied by different Sciences, the ancient rhetoric is looked at by most researchers as the art of philology. But the approach by Aristotle, in his Rhetoric, was legal rather than linguistic. Among the Aristotle's 4 requirements concerning good style (correctness, clarity, relevance and eloquence) eloquence is only % and the % are closer to the law. Rhetoric has incorporated all the features of linguistic mechanisms and gave them to the law. The law perceived moral and ethical ideas: the good justice, virtue, ritual, law and techniques of philology and persuasion, among which the main one is syllogism already used in the dialectic, the main logic principle of legal reasoning. Towards the past, rhetoric is parallel to dialectic, but dialectic is focused on one person or on the speaker, and rhetoric aims at the audience, the first one tries to convince himself and the second tries to convince the audience and in this role rhetoric is linked with the law. As far as the evolution of law is concerned, instead of legal technique there was rhetoric (especially in its methodological form, defined by Aristotle), which can be considered as a step towards creating the law as a design in ancient Greece. It is proved by a comparison of the ancient institution of judicial process and judicial speeches with modern legal technicalities, which shows that the legal machinery embraced the principles of "rhetorical" technique. The methodological nature of the rhetoric by Aristotle is usually overlooked by linguists and lawyers.https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/376rhetoricenthymemesyllogismeloquencetechnical artmethodology of sciencespersuasion
spellingShingle K. Kh. Rekosh
Rhetoric by Avistotel: a Legal View
Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
rhetoric
enthymeme
syllogism
eloquence
technical art
methodology of sciences
persuasion
title Rhetoric by Avistotel: a Legal View
title_full Rhetoric by Avistotel: a Legal View
title_fullStr Rhetoric by Avistotel: a Legal View
title_full_unstemmed Rhetoric by Avistotel: a Legal View
title_short Rhetoric by Avistotel: a Legal View
title_sort rhetoric by avistotel a legal view
topic rhetoric
enthymeme
syllogism
eloquence
technical art
methodology of sciences
persuasion
url https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/376
work_keys_str_mv AT kkhrekosh rhetoricbyavistotelalegalview