Factors associated with stellate ganglion block success in recurrent ventricular arrhythmias

Abstract Aims One treatment option for refractory ventricular arrythmias is stellate ganglion block (SGB). We examined differences in SGB success by patient and arrhythmia characteristics and predictors of successful SGB. Methods and results This was a multicenter analysis of patients treated for re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fouad Chouairi, Marat Fudim, Ales Benak, Jonathan P. Piccini, Jakub Toman, Josef Kautzner, Arun Ganesh, Marek Sramko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-02-01
Series:ESC Heart Failure
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.15072
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Aims One treatment option for refractory ventricular arrythmias is stellate ganglion block (SGB). We examined differences in SGB success by patient and arrhythmia characteristics and predictors of successful SGB. Methods and results This was a multicenter analysis of patients treated for refractory ventricular arrythmias in the Czech Republic and the United States. The primary outcome was absence of ventricular arrythmias at 24 h post SGB. SGB effectiveness was examined according to aetiology of cardiomyopathy, arrhythmia type, laterality of SGB, presence of inotropes, and presence of mechanical circulatory support. Binary logistic regression was used to examine variables associated with the primary outcome. In total there were 117 patients with refractory ventricular arrythmias treated with SGB. Overall, the mean age was 63.5 ± 11.0 years, majority of patients were male (94.0%), White (87.2%), and had an implantable cardioverter defibrillator in situ (70.1%). There were no differences in efficacy of SGB based on aetiology of cardiomyopathy (P = 0.623), arrhythmia type (0.852), laterality of block (P = 0.131), and presence of inotropes (P = 0.083). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that increased age was associated with decreased odds of SGB success (odds ratio: 0.96, confidence interval: 0.92–0.99, P = 0.039) whereas increased left ventricular ejection fraction trended towards increased odds of SGB success (odds ratio: 1.05, confidence interval: 0.995–1.11, P = 0.077). Conclusions In this multicentre experience, SGB was similarly effective despite the aetiology of cardiomyopathy, type of arrhythmia, laterality, and inotropic or mechanical support. SGB was less effective for the suppression of ventricular arrythmias at 24 h for the elderly.
ISSN:2055-5822