A Radiographic Comparison between Successful and Failed Total Contact Casted Patients with Charcot Neuroarthropathy

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot; Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the influence of foot deformity severity, as assessed by radiographic measurements, on the efficacy of total contact casting (TCC) in patients with Charcot neuroarthropathy. TCC is a common treatment in this patie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Avani Chopra BS, Zachary A. Koroneos BS, Christian Benedict BS, Michaela D. Pitcher BS, Michael Aynardi MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2024-12-01
Series:Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011424S00118
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850123323527135232
author Avani Chopra BS
Zachary A. Koroneos BS
Christian Benedict BS
Michaela D. Pitcher BS
Michaela D. Pitcher BS
Michael Aynardi MD
author_facet Avani Chopra BS
Zachary A. Koroneos BS
Christian Benedict BS
Michaela D. Pitcher BS
Michaela D. Pitcher BS
Michael Aynardi MD
author_sort Avani Chopra BS
collection DOAJ
description Category: Midfoot/Forefoot; Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the influence of foot deformity severity, as assessed by radiographic measurements, on the efficacy of total contact casting (TCC) in patients with Charcot neuroarthropathy. TCC is a common treatment in this patient population that aims to immobilize the foot and ankle to mitigate trauma, preventing additional damage, and safeguard the foot structure. There is limited data on the optimal radiographic measurement in predicting which patients will be successfully treated with TCC (Griffiths et al., 2021). By comparing radiographic outcomes between patients who were successfully treated with TCC and those who required surgical intervention following TCC failure, we seek to clarify the role of anatomical deformity in treatment prognosis. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of Charcot neuroarthropathy patients treated within a single healthcare system. Patients with radiographs of the affected foot within 2 years prior to or 1 year after the initiation of TCC. Patients were divided into two groups: those successfully managed with TCC (n=10) and those necessitating surgery due to TCC failure (n=16). Ten measurements of standard radiographic parameters used for quantifying the level of deformity in Charcot (Wukich et al., 2014) were included in this study. These measurements were Meary’s angle, Calcaneal pitch, medial and lateral column height, calcaneal 5th metatarsal angle, talar declination, tibiotalar angle, Kite’s angle, hindfoot-forefoot angle, and talonavicular coverage angle. All measurements were collected using Phillips PACS Software (Release 4.7) by three trained evaluators with two evaluators assigned per scan. Differences in the average [value] between groups were assessed using an unpaired t-test. Results: The cohort was comprised of 26 patients (16 males, 10 females). Our analysis revealed that lateral column height was the only parameter with a statistically significant difference in the height measurement (p< 0.05) between the groups. There were no other significant differences detected amongst any of the 9 other measurements. Conclusion: This study revealed that there is a lack of significant differences in most radiographic measurements between patients successfully treated with TCC and those requiring surgical intervention. This may suggest that standard radiographic measurements used for characterizing foot deformity does not help to predict the outcomes of TCC for CN. These findings emphasize the need for a more comprehensive understanding of treatment success predictors beyond anatomical considerations.
format Article
id doaj-art-01c1079d149d4a7b92abe55765f1f986
institution OA Journals
issn 2473-0114
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
spelling doaj-art-01c1079d149d4a7b92abe55765f1f9862025-08-20T02:34:36ZengSAGE PublishingFoot & Ankle Orthopaedics2473-01142024-12-01910.1177/2473011424S00118A Radiographic Comparison between Successful and Failed Total Contact Casted Patients with Charcot NeuroarthropathyAvani Chopra BSZachary A. Koroneos BSChristian Benedict BSMichaela D. Pitcher BSMichaela D. Pitcher BSMichael Aynardi MDCategory: Midfoot/Forefoot; Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the influence of foot deformity severity, as assessed by radiographic measurements, on the efficacy of total contact casting (TCC) in patients with Charcot neuroarthropathy. TCC is a common treatment in this patient population that aims to immobilize the foot and ankle to mitigate trauma, preventing additional damage, and safeguard the foot structure. There is limited data on the optimal radiographic measurement in predicting which patients will be successfully treated with TCC (Griffiths et al., 2021). By comparing radiographic outcomes between patients who were successfully treated with TCC and those who required surgical intervention following TCC failure, we seek to clarify the role of anatomical deformity in treatment prognosis. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of Charcot neuroarthropathy patients treated within a single healthcare system. Patients with radiographs of the affected foot within 2 years prior to or 1 year after the initiation of TCC. Patients were divided into two groups: those successfully managed with TCC (n=10) and those necessitating surgery due to TCC failure (n=16). Ten measurements of standard radiographic parameters used for quantifying the level of deformity in Charcot (Wukich et al., 2014) were included in this study. These measurements were Meary’s angle, Calcaneal pitch, medial and lateral column height, calcaneal 5th metatarsal angle, talar declination, tibiotalar angle, Kite’s angle, hindfoot-forefoot angle, and talonavicular coverage angle. All measurements were collected using Phillips PACS Software (Release 4.7) by three trained evaluators with two evaluators assigned per scan. Differences in the average [value] between groups were assessed using an unpaired t-test. Results: The cohort was comprised of 26 patients (16 males, 10 females). Our analysis revealed that lateral column height was the only parameter with a statistically significant difference in the height measurement (p< 0.05) between the groups. There were no other significant differences detected amongst any of the 9 other measurements. Conclusion: This study revealed that there is a lack of significant differences in most radiographic measurements between patients successfully treated with TCC and those requiring surgical intervention. This may suggest that standard radiographic measurements used for characterizing foot deformity does not help to predict the outcomes of TCC for CN. These findings emphasize the need for a more comprehensive understanding of treatment success predictors beyond anatomical considerations.https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011424S00118
spellingShingle Avani Chopra BS
Zachary A. Koroneos BS
Christian Benedict BS
Michaela D. Pitcher BS
Michaela D. Pitcher BS
Michael Aynardi MD
A Radiographic Comparison between Successful and Failed Total Contact Casted Patients with Charcot Neuroarthropathy
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
title A Radiographic Comparison between Successful and Failed Total Contact Casted Patients with Charcot Neuroarthropathy
title_full A Radiographic Comparison between Successful and Failed Total Contact Casted Patients with Charcot Neuroarthropathy
title_fullStr A Radiographic Comparison between Successful and Failed Total Contact Casted Patients with Charcot Neuroarthropathy
title_full_unstemmed A Radiographic Comparison between Successful and Failed Total Contact Casted Patients with Charcot Neuroarthropathy
title_short A Radiographic Comparison between Successful and Failed Total Contact Casted Patients with Charcot Neuroarthropathy
title_sort radiographic comparison between successful and failed total contact casted patients with charcot neuroarthropathy
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011424S00118
work_keys_str_mv AT avanichoprabs aradiographiccomparisonbetweensuccessfulandfailedtotalcontactcastedpatientswithcharcotneuroarthropathy
AT zacharyakoroneosbs aradiographiccomparisonbetweensuccessfulandfailedtotalcontactcastedpatientswithcharcotneuroarthropathy
AT christianbenedictbs aradiographiccomparisonbetweensuccessfulandfailedtotalcontactcastedpatientswithcharcotneuroarthropathy
AT michaeladpitcherbs aradiographiccomparisonbetweensuccessfulandfailedtotalcontactcastedpatientswithcharcotneuroarthropathy
AT michaeladpitcherbs aradiographiccomparisonbetweensuccessfulandfailedtotalcontactcastedpatientswithcharcotneuroarthropathy
AT michaelaynardimd aradiographiccomparisonbetweensuccessfulandfailedtotalcontactcastedpatientswithcharcotneuroarthropathy
AT avanichoprabs radiographiccomparisonbetweensuccessfulandfailedtotalcontactcastedpatientswithcharcotneuroarthropathy
AT zacharyakoroneosbs radiographiccomparisonbetweensuccessfulandfailedtotalcontactcastedpatientswithcharcotneuroarthropathy
AT christianbenedictbs radiographiccomparisonbetweensuccessfulandfailedtotalcontactcastedpatientswithcharcotneuroarthropathy
AT michaeladpitcherbs radiographiccomparisonbetweensuccessfulandfailedtotalcontactcastedpatientswithcharcotneuroarthropathy
AT michaeladpitcherbs radiographiccomparisonbetweensuccessfulandfailedtotalcontactcastedpatientswithcharcotneuroarthropathy
AT michaelaynardimd radiographiccomparisonbetweensuccessfulandfailedtotalcontactcastedpatientswithcharcotneuroarthropathy