Polonization as a Determinant of National Identities of Ukraine and Belarus

Since their independence, Ukraine and Belarus have pursued relatively consistent but almost polar-opposite policies toward Russia. For the most part, the difference is explicable not as a product of differing material pressures and incentives (which do not, in fact, differ significantly), but as a c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dylan Payne Royce
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MGIMO University Press 2021-03-01
Series:Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/2664
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832579803373371392
author Dylan Payne Royce
author_facet Dylan Payne Royce
author_sort Dylan Payne Royce
collection DOAJ
description Since their independence, Ukraine and Belarus have pursued relatively consistent but almost polar-opposite policies toward Russia. For the most part, the difference is explicable not as a product of differing material pressures and incentives (which do not, in fact, differ significantly), but as a consequence of differing popular and elite conceptions of Ukrainian and Belarusian national identities, which yield different beliefs about the proper relationship of those nations to Russia. The article argues that the difference is largely traceable to the 16th and 17th centuries, when the Grand Duchy of Lithuania’s southern lands – modern western and central Ukraine – were transferred to the Kingdom of Poland, and subsequently conquered by Russia in stages, while Belarus remained within Lithuania until also conquered by Russia. This resulted in different Ukrainian and Belarusian territories spending vastly different amounts of time under Polish rule. Considering that Rusian culture originally had a high status in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, and that Polonization naturally proceeded more intensely in Poland than in Lithuania, the author hypothesizes that: 1) the longer a territory was under Polish rule, the more subject it was to Polonization; 2) the more it was subject to Polonization, the more it developed a western European identity; 3) the more Ukrainian and Belarusian national identities were westernized, the more alienated they became from non-westernized Rusian nationalities, primarily the (Great) Russian (русский / великорусский / российский); 4) the more alienated a national identity is from Russia, the more its bearers seek to separate themselves from Russia. The research finds out that the longer an area was under Polish rule, the more support it subsequently displayed for separation and distancing from Russia. Ukrainian territories, especially in the west and center of the country, were long under Polish rule and accordingly tend toward an anti-Russian alignment that was visible even a century ago. On the other hand, Belarus, ruled by the Grand Duchy of Lithuania but never by Poland directly, expressed little desire to abandon the Russian Empire a century ago, and today continues a policy of friendship and integration with Russia.The article combines various qualitative and quantitative methods to demonstrate how centuries-long historical processes reshaped a national identity, with massive consequences that still endure today.
format Article
id doaj-art-0196a090cb49443d8ff2dd3b6ed4fd0e
institution Kabale University
issn 2071-8160
2541-9099
language English
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher MGIMO University Press
record_format Article
series Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
spelling doaj-art-0196a090cb49443d8ff2dd3b6ed4fd0e2025-01-30T12:15:54ZengMGIMO University PressVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta2071-81602541-90992021-03-01141489310.24833/2071-8160-2021-1-76-48-932200Polonization as a Determinant of National Identities of Ukraine and BelarusDylan Payne Royce0George Washington UniversitySince their independence, Ukraine and Belarus have pursued relatively consistent but almost polar-opposite policies toward Russia. For the most part, the difference is explicable not as a product of differing material pressures and incentives (which do not, in fact, differ significantly), but as a consequence of differing popular and elite conceptions of Ukrainian and Belarusian national identities, which yield different beliefs about the proper relationship of those nations to Russia. The article argues that the difference is largely traceable to the 16th and 17th centuries, when the Grand Duchy of Lithuania’s southern lands – modern western and central Ukraine – were transferred to the Kingdom of Poland, and subsequently conquered by Russia in stages, while Belarus remained within Lithuania until also conquered by Russia. This resulted in different Ukrainian and Belarusian territories spending vastly different amounts of time under Polish rule. Considering that Rusian culture originally had a high status in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, and that Polonization naturally proceeded more intensely in Poland than in Lithuania, the author hypothesizes that: 1) the longer a territory was under Polish rule, the more subject it was to Polonization; 2) the more it was subject to Polonization, the more it developed a western European identity; 3) the more Ukrainian and Belarusian national identities were westernized, the more alienated they became from non-westernized Rusian nationalities, primarily the (Great) Russian (русский / великорусский / российский); 4) the more alienated a national identity is from Russia, the more its bearers seek to separate themselves from Russia. The research finds out that the longer an area was under Polish rule, the more support it subsequently displayed for separation and distancing from Russia. Ukrainian territories, especially in the west and center of the country, were long under Polish rule and accordingly tend toward an anti-Russian alignment that was visible even a century ago. On the other hand, Belarus, ruled by the Grand Duchy of Lithuania but never by Poland directly, expressed little desire to abandon the Russian Empire a century ago, and today continues a policy of friendship and integration with Russia.The article combines various qualitative and quantitative methods to demonstrate how centuries-long historical processes reshaped a national identity, with massive consequences that still endure today.https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/2664polonizationukrainebelarusnational identityrussiapolandussrgrand duchy of lithuaniakingdom of polandnationalism
spellingShingle Dylan Payne Royce
Polonization as a Determinant of National Identities of Ukraine and Belarus
Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
polonization
ukraine
belarus
national identity
russia
poland
ussr
grand duchy of lithuania
kingdom of poland
nationalism
title Polonization as a Determinant of National Identities of Ukraine and Belarus
title_full Polonization as a Determinant of National Identities of Ukraine and Belarus
title_fullStr Polonization as a Determinant of National Identities of Ukraine and Belarus
title_full_unstemmed Polonization as a Determinant of National Identities of Ukraine and Belarus
title_short Polonization as a Determinant of National Identities of Ukraine and Belarus
title_sort polonization as a determinant of national identities of ukraine and belarus
topic polonization
ukraine
belarus
national identity
russia
poland
ussr
grand duchy of lithuania
kingdom of poland
nationalism
url https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/2664
work_keys_str_mv AT dylanpayneroyce polonizationasadeterminantofnationalidentitiesofukraineandbelarus