Interim Evaluation of the Tier 1 Program (Secondary 1 Curriculum) of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: First Year of the Full Implementation Phase
To understand the implementation quality of the Tier 1 Program (Secondary 1 Curriculum) of the Project P.A.T.H.S. (Positive Adolescent Training through Holistic Social Programmes) in the full implementation phase, 100 schools were randomly selected to participate in personal and/or telephone intervi...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2008-01-01
|
Series: | The Scientific World Journal |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2008.5 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832564038400212992 |
---|---|
author | Daniel T. L. Shek Hing Keung Ma Rachel C. F. Sun |
author_facet | Daniel T. L. Shek Hing Keung Ma Rachel C. F. Sun |
author_sort | Daniel T. L. Shek |
collection | DOAJ |
description | To understand the implementation quality of the Tier 1 Program (Secondary 1 Curriculum) of the Project P.A.T.H.S. (Positive Adolescent Training through Holistic Social Programmes) in the full implementation phase, 100 schools were randomly selected to participate in personal and/or telephone interviews regarding the quality of the implementation process of the Tier 1 Program. In the interviews, the participants described the responses of the students to the program, the perceived benefits of the program, the perceived good aspects of the program, and the areas requiring improvement, difficulties encountered in the implementation process, and perceived attributes of the worker-support scheme (“Co-Walker Scheme”). Results showed that most workers perceived that the students had positive responses to the program and the program was beneficial to the students. They also identified several good aspects in the program, although negative comments on the program design and difficulties in the implementation process were also recorded. Roughly half of the respondents had positive comments on the “Co-Walker Scheme”. In sum, the respondents generally regarded the program as beneficial to the students and they were satisfied with the Tier 1 Program (Secondary 1 Curriculum) in the full implementation phase, although some implementation difficulties were also expressed. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-019569b09c5a4ee6ab76645b47936e10 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1537-744X |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | The Scientific World Journal |
spelling | doaj-art-019569b09c5a4ee6ab76645b47936e102025-02-03T01:11:58ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2008-01-018476010.1100/tsw.2008.5Interim Evaluation of the Tier 1 Program (Secondary 1 Curriculum) of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: First Year of the Full Implementation PhaseDaniel T. L. Shek0Hing Keung Ma1Rachel C. F. Sun2Quality of Life Centre, Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong KongEducation Studies Department, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong KongSocial Welfare Practice and Research Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong KongTo understand the implementation quality of the Tier 1 Program (Secondary 1 Curriculum) of the Project P.A.T.H.S. (Positive Adolescent Training through Holistic Social Programmes) in the full implementation phase, 100 schools were randomly selected to participate in personal and/or telephone interviews regarding the quality of the implementation process of the Tier 1 Program. In the interviews, the participants described the responses of the students to the program, the perceived benefits of the program, the perceived good aspects of the program, and the areas requiring improvement, difficulties encountered in the implementation process, and perceived attributes of the worker-support scheme (“Co-Walker Scheme”). Results showed that most workers perceived that the students had positive responses to the program and the program was beneficial to the students. They also identified several good aspects in the program, although negative comments on the program design and difficulties in the implementation process were also recorded. Roughly half of the respondents had positive comments on the “Co-Walker Scheme”. In sum, the respondents generally regarded the program as beneficial to the students and they were satisfied with the Tier 1 Program (Secondary 1 Curriculum) in the full implementation phase, although some implementation difficulties were also expressed.http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2008.5 |
spellingShingle | Daniel T. L. Shek Hing Keung Ma Rachel C. F. Sun Interim Evaluation of the Tier 1 Program (Secondary 1 Curriculum) of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: First Year of the Full Implementation Phase The Scientific World Journal |
title | Interim Evaluation of the Tier 1 Program (Secondary 1 Curriculum) of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: First Year of the Full Implementation Phase |
title_full | Interim Evaluation of the Tier 1 Program (Secondary 1 Curriculum) of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: First Year of the Full Implementation Phase |
title_fullStr | Interim Evaluation of the Tier 1 Program (Secondary 1 Curriculum) of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: First Year of the Full Implementation Phase |
title_full_unstemmed | Interim Evaluation of the Tier 1 Program (Secondary 1 Curriculum) of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: First Year of the Full Implementation Phase |
title_short | Interim Evaluation of the Tier 1 Program (Secondary 1 Curriculum) of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: First Year of the Full Implementation Phase |
title_sort | interim evaluation of the tier 1 program secondary 1 curriculum of the project p a t h s first year of the full implementation phase |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2008.5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT danieltlshek interimevaluationofthetier1programsecondary1curriculumoftheprojectpathsfirstyearofthefullimplementationphase AT hingkeungma interimevaluationofthetier1programsecondary1curriculumoftheprojectpathsfirstyearofthefullimplementationphase AT rachelcfsun interimevaluationofthetier1programsecondary1curriculumoftheprojectpathsfirstyearofthefullimplementationphase |