Effects of Somatic Cell Count and Various Environmental Factors on

In this study, the effects of somatic cell count (SCC) and various environmental factors on milk yield and foremilk constituents in Red-Holstein (RH) cows raised under Mediterranean climatic conditions in Aydın Province in Turkey were determined. A total of 891 foremilk samples collected from 129 co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Atakan Koç
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ankara University 2015-08-01
Series:Journal of Agricultural Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/21120
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849704463578693632
author Atakan Koç
Atakan Koç
author_facet Atakan Koç
Atakan Koç
author_sort Atakan Koç
collection DOAJ
description In this study, the effects of somatic cell count (SCC) and various environmental factors on milk yield and foremilk constituents in Red-Holstein (RH) cows raised under Mediterranean climatic conditions in Aydın Province in Turkey were determined. A total of 891 foremilk samples collected from 129 cows during morning and evening milkings in winter and summer seasons between 2009 and 2012 were analysed for protein content (PC), lactose content (LC), nonfat dry matter content (NFDMC), and SCC. SCC data were split into 6 groups (<100,000 cells mL-1; 100,000-199,999 cells mL-1; 200,000-299,999 cells mL-1; 300,000-399,999 cells mL-1; 400,000-750,000 cells mL-1; and >750,000 cells mL-1) before statistical analysis. LS MEANS of sampling time milk yield (STMY), PC, LC, NFDMC, and Log10SCC for winter and summer seasons were 11.27±0.253 kg and 10.59±0.226 kg (P<0.05), 3.24±0.024% and 3.04±0.021% (P<0.01), 4.44±0.028% and 4.48±0.025% (P>0.05), 8.68±0.045% and 8.50±0.040% (P<0.01), and 5.051±0.0508 (112,461 cells mL-1) and 4.914±0.0428 (82,035 cells mL-1) (P<0.05), respectively. Compared to the first SCC group, STMY, LC, and NFDMC decreased to 1.1 kg (9.4%), 6.4%, and 3.8% in the fifth group and 1.49 kg (12.7%), 11.3%, and 6.3% in the sixth group, respectively (P<0.05). In conclusion, LC could be used as a mastitis marker due to a distinct decrease in LC as SCC increases. Additionally, due to significant reductions in the STMY, PC, and NFDMC in the summer season, some precautions are required to prevent possible heat stress in this herd and the herds managed in the regions with hot summer months.
format Article
id doaj-art-017cf5171c154ebfb34d504ff6a4a67c
institution DOAJ
issn 1300-7580
2148-9297
language English
publishDate 2015-08-01
publisher Ankara University
record_format Article
series Journal of Agricultural Sciences
spelling doaj-art-017cf5171c154ebfb34d504ff6a4a67c2025-08-20T03:16:45ZengAnkara UniversityJournal of Agricultural Sciences1300-75802148-92972015-08-0121343944710.15832/ankutbd.2513545Effects of Somatic Cell Count and Various Environmental Factors onAtakan KoçAtakan KoçIn this study, the effects of somatic cell count (SCC) and various environmental factors on milk yield and foremilk constituents in Red-Holstein (RH) cows raised under Mediterranean climatic conditions in Aydın Province in Turkey were determined. A total of 891 foremilk samples collected from 129 cows during morning and evening milkings in winter and summer seasons between 2009 and 2012 were analysed for protein content (PC), lactose content (LC), nonfat dry matter content (NFDMC), and SCC. SCC data were split into 6 groups (<100,000 cells mL-1; 100,000-199,999 cells mL-1; 200,000-299,999 cells mL-1; 300,000-399,999 cells mL-1; 400,000-750,000 cells mL-1; and >750,000 cells mL-1) before statistical analysis. LS MEANS of sampling time milk yield (STMY), PC, LC, NFDMC, and Log10SCC for winter and summer seasons were 11.27±0.253 kg and 10.59±0.226 kg (P<0.05), 3.24±0.024% and 3.04±0.021% (P<0.01), 4.44±0.028% and 4.48±0.025% (P>0.05), 8.68±0.045% and 8.50±0.040% (P<0.01), and 5.051±0.0508 (112,461 cells mL-1) and 4.914±0.0428 (82,035 cells mL-1) (P<0.05), respectively. Compared to the first SCC group, STMY, LC, and NFDMC decreased to 1.1 kg (9.4%), 6.4%, and 3.8% in the fifth group and 1.49 kg (12.7%), 11.3%, and 6.3% in the sixth group, respectively (P<0.05). In conclusion, LC could be used as a mastitis marker due to a distinct decrease in LC as SCC increases. Additionally, due to significant reductions in the STMY, PC, and NFDMC in the summer season, some precautions are required to prevent possible heat stress in this herd and the herds managed in the regions with hot summer months.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/21120somatic cell count; protein content; lactose content; milk yield losssomatik hücre sayısı protein oranı laktoz oranı süt verim kaybı
spellingShingle Atakan Koç
Atakan Koç
Effects of Somatic Cell Count and Various Environmental Factors on
Journal of Agricultural Sciences
somatic cell count; protein content; lactose content; milk yield loss
somatik hücre sayısı
protein oranı
laktoz oranı
süt verim kaybı
title Effects of Somatic Cell Count and Various Environmental Factors on
title_full Effects of Somatic Cell Count and Various Environmental Factors on
title_fullStr Effects of Somatic Cell Count and Various Environmental Factors on
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Somatic Cell Count and Various Environmental Factors on
title_short Effects of Somatic Cell Count and Various Environmental Factors on
title_sort effects of somatic cell count and various environmental factors on
topic somatic cell count; protein content; lactose content; milk yield loss
somatik hücre sayısı
protein oranı
laktoz oranı
süt verim kaybı
url https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/21120
work_keys_str_mv AT atakankoc effectsofsomaticcellcountandvariousenvironmentalfactorson
AT atakankoc effectsofsomaticcellcountandvariousenvironmentalfactorson