Comparing the effects of magnesium sulfate and lidocaine spray on hemodynamic changes caused by laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial

Abstract Aim This study aims at comparing the impact of Magnesium Sulfate and Lidocaine sprays on hemodynamic changes after laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Design This double-blind clinical trial (code IRCT20230719058846N1) was conducted on the patients undergoing elective surgery in the city...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marzieh khalaji, Mohadese Babaie, Fatemeh Bayat, Mehdi Rezaee, Banafsheh Mashak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-02-01
Series:BMC Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02962-x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850087197655433216
author Marzieh khalaji
Mohadese Babaie
Fatemeh Bayat
Mehdi Rezaee
Banafsheh Mashak
author_facet Marzieh khalaji
Mohadese Babaie
Fatemeh Bayat
Mehdi Rezaee
Banafsheh Mashak
author_sort Marzieh khalaji
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aim This study aims at comparing the impact of Magnesium Sulfate and Lidocaine sprays on hemodynamic changes after laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Design This double-blind clinical trial (code IRCT20230719058846N1) was conducted on the patients undergoing elective surgery in the city of Karaj. Methods A total of 100 patients, aged 18 to 40 years and classified as ASA I or II, who were candidates for elective surgery, were randomly assigned to two equal groups. Prior to intubation, patients received lidocaine spray (5 puffs of Lidocaine 10%) in one group, and magnesium sulfate spray (5 puffs of Magnesium 20%) in the other. Induction of anesthesia was the same in both groups. Patients’ hemodynamic statuses were measured and compared once before the intubation and also 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 min after it. Results Before the intervention, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of demographic and hemodynamic variables (P < 0.05). The results showed that the systolic blood pressure at minutes 3, 5, and 7 was significantly lower among the patients receiving magnesium than those receiving lidocaine (P < 0.05). Other hemodynamic variables were not statistically different between the two groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion Based on the findings of the present study, magnesium sulfate spray is more effective than lidocaine in controlling hemodynamic complications. Therefore, it can be used to reduce hemodynamic complications following intubation. However, it may be associated with tachycardia, which needs to be taken into account.
format Article
id doaj-art-015e8b5a384444ffb71d2c6c943ae379
institution DOAJ
issn 1471-2253
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Anesthesiology
spelling doaj-art-015e8b5a384444ffb71d2c6c943ae3792025-08-20T02:43:16ZengBMCBMC Anesthesiology1471-22532025-02-012511710.1186/s12871-025-02962-xComparing the effects of magnesium sulfate and lidocaine spray on hemodynamic changes caused by laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trialMarzieh khalaji0Mohadese Babaie1Fatemeh Bayat2Mehdi Rezaee3Banafsheh Mashak4Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical SciencesDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Alborz University of Medical SciencesClinical Research Development Unit (CRDU) of Shahid Rajaei Hospital, Alborz University of Medical SciencesSchool of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical SciencesSchool of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical SciencesAbstract Aim This study aims at comparing the impact of Magnesium Sulfate and Lidocaine sprays on hemodynamic changes after laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Design This double-blind clinical trial (code IRCT20230719058846N1) was conducted on the patients undergoing elective surgery in the city of Karaj. Methods A total of 100 patients, aged 18 to 40 years and classified as ASA I or II, who were candidates for elective surgery, were randomly assigned to two equal groups. Prior to intubation, patients received lidocaine spray (5 puffs of Lidocaine 10%) in one group, and magnesium sulfate spray (5 puffs of Magnesium 20%) in the other. Induction of anesthesia was the same in both groups. Patients’ hemodynamic statuses were measured and compared once before the intubation and also 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 min after it. Results Before the intervention, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of demographic and hemodynamic variables (P < 0.05). The results showed that the systolic blood pressure at minutes 3, 5, and 7 was significantly lower among the patients receiving magnesium than those receiving lidocaine (P < 0.05). Other hemodynamic variables were not statistically different between the two groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion Based on the findings of the present study, magnesium sulfate spray is more effective than lidocaine in controlling hemodynamic complications. Therefore, it can be used to reduce hemodynamic complications following intubation. However, it may be associated with tachycardia, which needs to be taken into account.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02962-xEndotracheal intubationHemodynamic responseLaryngoscopyLidocaine sprayMagnesium sulfate spray
spellingShingle Marzieh khalaji
Mohadese Babaie
Fatemeh Bayat
Mehdi Rezaee
Banafsheh Mashak
Comparing the effects of magnesium sulfate and lidocaine spray on hemodynamic changes caused by laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial
BMC Anesthesiology
Endotracheal intubation
Hemodynamic response
Laryngoscopy
Lidocaine spray
Magnesium sulfate spray
title Comparing the effects of magnesium sulfate and lidocaine spray on hemodynamic changes caused by laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial
title_full Comparing the effects of magnesium sulfate and lidocaine spray on hemodynamic changes caused by laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparing the effects of magnesium sulfate and lidocaine spray on hemodynamic changes caused by laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the effects of magnesium sulfate and lidocaine spray on hemodynamic changes caused by laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial
title_short Comparing the effects of magnesium sulfate and lidocaine spray on hemodynamic changes caused by laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial
title_sort comparing the effects of magnesium sulfate and lidocaine spray on hemodynamic changes caused by laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation a randomized clinical trial
topic Endotracheal intubation
Hemodynamic response
Laryngoscopy
Lidocaine spray
Magnesium sulfate spray
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02962-x
work_keys_str_mv AT marziehkhalaji comparingtheeffectsofmagnesiumsulfateandlidocainesprayonhemodynamicchangescausedbylaryngoscopyandtrachealintubationarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mohadesebabaie comparingtheeffectsofmagnesiumsulfateandlidocainesprayonhemodynamicchangescausedbylaryngoscopyandtrachealintubationarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT fatemehbayat comparingtheeffectsofmagnesiumsulfateandlidocainesprayonhemodynamicchangescausedbylaryngoscopyandtrachealintubationarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mehdirezaee comparingtheeffectsofmagnesiumsulfateandlidocainesprayonhemodynamicchangescausedbylaryngoscopyandtrachealintubationarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT banafshehmashak comparingtheeffectsofmagnesiumsulfateandlidocainesprayonhemodynamicchangescausedbylaryngoscopyandtrachealintubationarandomizedclinicaltrial