Quel profil du lecteur-apprenant algérien face à un mythe ?
By its inscription in an ontological and anthropological dimension, by its ability to lead its reader towards an identification process, the myth is a key to the reading, the comprehension and the interpretation of literary works. Myths are universal vectors of symbolization (fourtanier, 2012 : 23-2...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Université Abderrahmane Mira
2018-06-01
|
| Series: | Multilinguales |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/multilinguales/1430 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | By its inscription in an ontological and anthropological dimension, by its ability to lead its reader towards an identification process, the myth is a key to the reading, the comprehension and the interpretation of literary works. Myths are universal vectors of symbolization (fourtanier, 2012 : 23-24). In this sense, what effects could a (re) contextualization of the myth introduce to its reception ? What role can cultural stereotypes play in the reception and interpretation of myths ? Could a character considered immoral, fantastic or absurd, influence us ? Why and how do our attitudes change towards fictional characters ?The reading of myths is a space where all compromises can be articulated. Capital that it is exercised within FFL classes : its support must take into account the dyad (posture of the reader and symbolic-cultural universe of the text). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2335-1535 2335-1853 |