Improved representation of laminar and turbulent sheet flow in subglacial drainage models

Subglacial hydrology models struggle to reproduce seasonal drainage patterns that are consistent with observed subglacial water pressures and surface velocities. We modify the standard sheet-flow parameterization within a coupled sheet–channel subglacial drainage model to smoothly transition between...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tim Hill, Gwenn Elizabeth Flowers, Matthew James Hoffman, Derek Bingham, Mauro Angelo Werder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2024-01-01
Series:Journal of Glaciology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S002214302300103X/type/journal_article
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841526394948943872
author Tim Hill
Gwenn Elizabeth Flowers
Matthew James Hoffman
Derek Bingham
Mauro Angelo Werder
author_facet Tim Hill
Gwenn Elizabeth Flowers
Matthew James Hoffman
Derek Bingham
Mauro Angelo Werder
author_sort Tim Hill
collection DOAJ
description Subglacial hydrology models struggle to reproduce seasonal drainage patterns that are consistent with observed subglacial water pressures and surface velocities. We modify the standard sheet-flow parameterization within a coupled sheet–channel subglacial drainage model to smoothly transition between laminar and turbulent flow based on the locally computed Reynolds number in a physically consistent way (the ‘transition’ model). We compare the transition model to standard laminar and turbulent models to assess the role of the sheet-flow parameterization in reconciling observed and modelled water pressures under idealized and realistic forcing. Relative to the turbulent model, the laminar and transition models improve seasonal simulations by increasing winter water pressure and producing a more prominent late-summer water pressure minimum. In contrast to the laminar model, the transition model remains consistent with its own internal assumptions across all flow regimes. Based on the internal consistency of the transition model and its improved performance relative to the standard turbulent model, we recommend its use for transient simulations of subglacial drainage.
format Article
id doaj-art-011cf0ceb9bb441f8279ac8be948319b
institution Kabale University
issn 0022-1430
1727-5652
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Glaciology
spelling doaj-art-011cf0ceb9bb441f8279ac8be948319b2025-01-16T21:52:53ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Glaciology0022-14301727-56522024-01-017010.1017/jog.2023.103Improved representation of laminar and turbulent sheet flow in subglacial drainage modelsTim Hill0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3538-7060Gwenn Elizabeth Flowers1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3574-9324Matthew James Hoffman2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5076-0540Derek Bingham3Mauro Angelo Werder4https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0137-9377Department of Earth Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, CanadaDepartment of Earth Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, CanadaFluid Dynamics and Solid Mechanics Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USADepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, CanadaLaboratory of Hydraulics, Hydrology and Glaciology (VAW), ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Birmensdorf, SwitzerlandSubglacial hydrology models struggle to reproduce seasonal drainage patterns that are consistent with observed subglacial water pressures and surface velocities. We modify the standard sheet-flow parameterization within a coupled sheet–channel subglacial drainage model to smoothly transition between laminar and turbulent flow based on the locally computed Reynolds number in a physically consistent way (the ‘transition’ model). We compare the transition model to standard laminar and turbulent models to assess the role of the sheet-flow parameterization in reconciling observed and modelled water pressures under idealized and realistic forcing. Relative to the turbulent model, the laminar and transition models improve seasonal simulations by increasing winter water pressure and producing a more prominent late-summer water pressure minimum. In contrast to the laminar model, the transition model remains consistent with its own internal assumptions across all flow regimes. Based on the internal consistency of the transition model and its improved performance relative to the standard turbulent model, we recommend its use for transient simulations of subglacial drainage.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S002214302300103X/type/journal_articleGlacier hydrologyglacier modellingsubglacial processes
spellingShingle Tim Hill
Gwenn Elizabeth Flowers
Matthew James Hoffman
Derek Bingham
Mauro Angelo Werder
Improved representation of laminar and turbulent sheet flow in subglacial drainage models
Journal of Glaciology
Glacier hydrology
glacier modelling
subglacial processes
title Improved representation of laminar and turbulent sheet flow in subglacial drainage models
title_full Improved representation of laminar and turbulent sheet flow in subglacial drainage models
title_fullStr Improved representation of laminar and turbulent sheet flow in subglacial drainage models
title_full_unstemmed Improved representation of laminar and turbulent sheet flow in subglacial drainage models
title_short Improved representation of laminar and turbulent sheet flow in subglacial drainage models
title_sort improved representation of laminar and turbulent sheet flow in subglacial drainage models
topic Glacier hydrology
glacier modelling
subglacial processes
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S002214302300103X/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT timhill improvedrepresentationoflaminarandturbulentsheetflowinsubglacialdrainagemodels
AT gwennelizabethflowers improvedrepresentationoflaminarandturbulentsheetflowinsubglacialdrainagemodels
AT matthewjameshoffman improvedrepresentationoflaminarandturbulentsheetflowinsubglacialdrainagemodels
AT derekbingham improvedrepresentationoflaminarandturbulentsheetflowinsubglacialdrainagemodels
AT mauroangelowerder improvedrepresentationoflaminarandturbulentsheetflowinsubglacialdrainagemodels