Evaluation of Different Dental Materials Used in Forensic Dentistry: A Comparative Study
Background: Forensic dentistry plays a pivotal role in the identification of individuals, particularly in mass disasters and criminal investigations. This study evaluates various dental materials used in forensic identification. Methods: Different dental materials were assessed for their effectivene...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_686_24 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849734457714540544 |
|---|---|
| author | Arshdeep S. Kohli Ganaraj Shetty Hari P. Gone Joseph J. K. Pothanikat Neeta J. Pothanikat Ahmed Al-Emam Rahul Tiwari |
| author_facet | Arshdeep S. Kohli Ganaraj Shetty Hari P. Gone Joseph J. K. Pothanikat Neeta J. Pothanikat Ahmed Al-Emam Rahul Tiwari |
| author_sort | Arshdeep S. Kohli |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background:
Forensic dentistry plays a pivotal role in the identification of individuals, particularly in mass disasters and criminal investigations. This study evaluates various dental materials used in forensic identification.
Methods:
Different dental materials were assessed for their effectiveness in forensic applications. Samples included dental amalgam, composite resins, glass ionomer cements, and dental ceramics. Parameters such as durability, ease of identification under forensic conditions, and resistance to environmental factors were analyzed.
Results:
Dental ceramics exhibited the highest durability and resistance to environmental degradation, followed by dental amalgam. Composite resins and glass ionomer cements showed lower performance in forensic conditions.
Conclusion:
Dental ceramics and amalgam provide superior forensic identification capabilities compared to other materials. This study supports the use of these materials in forensic dentistry due to their robustness and reliability. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-01056e46455e41aeb599b454ca858aa9 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 0976-4879 0975-7406 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-05-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| spelling | doaj-art-01056e46455e41aeb599b454ca858aa92025-08-20T03:07:47ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0976-48790975-74062025-05-0117Suppl 1S541S54310.4103/jpbs.jpbs_686_24Evaluation of Different Dental Materials Used in Forensic Dentistry: A Comparative StudyArshdeep S. KohliGanaraj ShettyHari P. GoneJoseph J. K. PothanikatNeeta J. PothanikatAhmed Al-EmamRahul TiwariBackground: Forensic dentistry plays a pivotal role in the identification of individuals, particularly in mass disasters and criminal investigations. This study evaluates various dental materials used in forensic identification. Methods: Different dental materials were assessed for their effectiveness in forensic applications. Samples included dental amalgam, composite resins, glass ionomer cements, and dental ceramics. Parameters such as durability, ease of identification under forensic conditions, and resistance to environmental factors were analyzed. Results: Dental ceramics exhibited the highest durability and resistance to environmental degradation, followed by dental amalgam. Composite resins and glass ionomer cements showed lower performance in forensic conditions. Conclusion: Dental ceramics and amalgam provide superior forensic identification capabilities compared to other materials. This study supports the use of these materials in forensic dentistry due to their robustness and reliability.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_686_24dental amalgamdental ceramicsdental materialsforensic dentistryforensic identification |
| spellingShingle | Arshdeep S. Kohli Ganaraj Shetty Hari P. Gone Joseph J. K. Pothanikat Neeta J. Pothanikat Ahmed Al-Emam Rahul Tiwari Evaluation of Different Dental Materials Used in Forensic Dentistry: A Comparative Study Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences dental amalgam dental ceramics dental materials forensic dentistry forensic identification |
| title | Evaluation of Different Dental Materials Used in Forensic Dentistry: A Comparative Study |
| title_full | Evaluation of Different Dental Materials Used in Forensic Dentistry: A Comparative Study |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of Different Dental Materials Used in Forensic Dentistry: A Comparative Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Different Dental Materials Used in Forensic Dentistry: A Comparative Study |
| title_short | Evaluation of Different Dental Materials Used in Forensic Dentistry: A Comparative Study |
| title_sort | evaluation of different dental materials used in forensic dentistry a comparative study |
| topic | dental amalgam dental ceramics dental materials forensic dentistry forensic identification |
| url | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_686_24 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT arshdeepskohli evaluationofdifferentdentalmaterialsusedinforensicdentistryacomparativestudy AT ganarajshetty evaluationofdifferentdentalmaterialsusedinforensicdentistryacomparativestudy AT haripgone evaluationofdifferentdentalmaterialsusedinforensicdentistryacomparativestudy AT josephjkpothanikat evaluationofdifferentdentalmaterialsusedinforensicdentistryacomparativestudy AT neetajpothanikat evaluationofdifferentdentalmaterialsusedinforensicdentistryacomparativestudy AT ahmedalemam evaluationofdifferentdentalmaterialsusedinforensicdentistryacomparativestudy AT rahultiwari evaluationofdifferentdentalmaterialsusedinforensicdentistryacomparativestudy |