A neo-positivist theory of scientific change
Historians of science appear to agree on two things. There is a shortage of large-scale histories of science, and positivism is best avoided. In fact, we have many big-picture histories of science. The problem is not the lack of such histories but the lack of agreement between them. They differ with...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Michael Bycroft, James Poskett |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | BJHS Themes |
| Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2058850X24000067/type/journal_article |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
The Purest Positivist of Them All? Denis Ong’s Equity Jurisprudence
by: Brendan Edgeworth
Published: (2023-04-01) -
Efficacy of Positivist Psychotherapy on the Perfectionism and Psychological Coherence in Married Childless Women
by: Zeynab Saketi, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01) -
A Post-Positivist and Interpretive Approach to Researching Teachers’ Language Assessment Literacy
by: Frank Giraldo
Published: (2020-01-01) -
The Problem of Meaning in The New Logic as A Basis for Elimination Metaphysics in The Logical Positivist Understanding
by: Neslihan Doğan
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Neo-Riemannian Theory
by: Edward Gollin
Published: (2005-04-01)