From Greenwashing to Sustainability: The Mediating Effect of Green Innovation in the Agribusiness Sector on Financial Performance
This study analyses the impact of agricultural greenwashing on financial performance via green innovation. To this end, it employs data from Chinese A-share agribusinesses from 2012 to 2022. The study indicates the following results: (1) the practice of greenwashing (ESG disclosure–performance gap,...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Agriculture |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/12/1316 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849467412913586176 |
|---|---|
| author | Zhongping Wang Xiaoying Tian |
| author_facet | Zhongping Wang Xiaoying Tian |
| author_sort | Zhongping Wang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This study analyses the impact of agricultural greenwashing on financial performance via green innovation. To this end, it employs data from Chinese A-share agribusinesses from 2012 to 2022. The study indicates the following results: (1) the practice of greenwashing (ESG disclosure–performance gap, GW) has a significant negative impact on ROA, particularly in non-state firms; (2) green innovation (patents, GI) partially mediates this relationship, with a percentage of 9.09%, as GW diverts research and development resources toward image management. Robustness checks are employed to confirm the results obtained using ROE and lagged models. Property rights moderate the effects: non-state firms are more adversely affected by innovation dependency, while state firms are protected by policies. The “double-edged” mechanism elucidates GW’s short-term legitimacy gains in contrast to long-term innovation suppression and financial decline. The report calls for the establishment of standardised ESG metrics (for example, the disclosure of pesticide residue) and targeted green incentives (for example, SME R&D subsidies) to be aligned with UN SDGs 9.4 (green tech) and 12.6 (responsible production). The present study offers insights into the governance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) matters within the context of agriculture in China. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-00d14a2cdfe84c578bb80167fe789867 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2077-0472 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-06-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Agriculture |
| spelling | doaj-art-00d14a2cdfe84c578bb80167fe7898672025-08-20T03:26:14ZengMDPI AGAgriculture2077-04722025-06-011512131610.3390/agriculture15121316From Greenwashing to Sustainability: The Mediating Effect of Green Innovation in the Agribusiness Sector on Financial PerformanceZhongping Wang0Xiaoying Tian1Economics and Management School of Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, ChinaEconomics and Management School of Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, ChinaThis study analyses the impact of agricultural greenwashing on financial performance via green innovation. To this end, it employs data from Chinese A-share agribusinesses from 2012 to 2022. The study indicates the following results: (1) the practice of greenwashing (ESG disclosure–performance gap, GW) has a significant negative impact on ROA, particularly in non-state firms; (2) green innovation (patents, GI) partially mediates this relationship, with a percentage of 9.09%, as GW diverts research and development resources toward image management. Robustness checks are employed to confirm the results obtained using ROE and lagged models. Property rights moderate the effects: non-state firms are more adversely affected by innovation dependency, while state firms are protected by policies. The “double-edged” mechanism elucidates GW’s short-term legitimacy gains in contrast to long-term innovation suppression and financial decline. The report calls for the establishment of standardised ESG metrics (for example, the disclosure of pesticide residue) and targeted green incentives (for example, SME R&D subsidies) to be aligned with UN SDGs 9.4 (green tech) and 12.6 (responsible production). The present study offers insights into the governance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) matters within the context of agriculture in China.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/12/1316greenwashinggreen innovationagricultureESG |
| spellingShingle | Zhongping Wang Xiaoying Tian From Greenwashing to Sustainability: The Mediating Effect of Green Innovation in the Agribusiness Sector on Financial Performance Agriculture greenwashing green innovation agriculture ESG |
| title | From Greenwashing to Sustainability: The Mediating Effect of Green Innovation in the Agribusiness Sector on Financial Performance |
| title_full | From Greenwashing to Sustainability: The Mediating Effect of Green Innovation in the Agribusiness Sector on Financial Performance |
| title_fullStr | From Greenwashing to Sustainability: The Mediating Effect of Green Innovation in the Agribusiness Sector on Financial Performance |
| title_full_unstemmed | From Greenwashing to Sustainability: The Mediating Effect of Green Innovation in the Agribusiness Sector on Financial Performance |
| title_short | From Greenwashing to Sustainability: The Mediating Effect of Green Innovation in the Agribusiness Sector on Financial Performance |
| title_sort | from greenwashing to sustainability the mediating effect of green innovation in the agribusiness sector on financial performance |
| topic | greenwashing green innovation agriculture ESG |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/12/1316 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT zhongpingwang fromgreenwashingtosustainabilitythemediatingeffectofgreeninnovationintheagribusinesssectoronfinancialperformance AT xiaoyingtian fromgreenwashingtosustainabilitythemediatingeffectofgreeninnovationintheagribusinesssectoronfinancialperformance |