The myth of Narcissus: Metamorphoses of medieval commentary

This article traces two types of commentaries on the myth of Narcissus (Ovid, The Metamorphoses, III), which existed in the Middle Ages in French literature in the vernacular — the courtly and the moral and allegorical. The first type of commentary is represented by individual works in which this my...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: I. K. Staf
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. RANEPA 2024-06-01
Series:Шаги
Subjects:
Online Access:https://steps.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/185
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849317407219253248
author I. K. Staf
author_facet I. K. Staf
author_sort I. K. Staf
collection DOAJ
description This article traces two types of commentaries on the myth of Narcissus (Ovid, The Metamorphoses, III), which existed in the Middle Ages in French literature in the vernacular — the courtly and the moral and allegorical. The first type of commentary is represented by individual works in which this myth is mentioned (“The Lay of Narcissus”, “The Romance of the Rose”, “The Book of Love Chess” by Evrart de Conty). In these, Ovid’s personage is treated as a violator of Amor’s laws; consequently, he takes on the traits of the “Belle Dame sans merci”. Commentaries of the second kind, such as the poetic and prose versions of “Moralized Ovid” (Ovide moralisé), interpret the figure of Narcissus as the embodiment of the Christian sin of pride, and of Echo as the good name disregarded by the proud man. This second type of commentary fragments the text of the “Metamorphoses” into separate stories and personages, each with its own allegorical meaning. The figure of Narcissus and the story of his death becomes a didactic exemplum that can be used in a sermon. In addition, by the early 15th century, such commentaries had been adopted into treatises on poetry (seconde rhétorique) and poetics (poetria, poetic fiction). In them, Narcissus becomes a rhetorical figure destined to create poetic works of high style. The logical conclusion of this process of fragmentation, which is also embodied in the miniatures of illuminated manuscripts, is the appearance in the 16th century of a new form which Ovid’s poem takes, the form of a collection of emblems.
format Article
id doaj-art-00cd6fc1d415430f999e63c1a7beb3f7
institution Kabale University
issn 2412-9410
2782-1765
language English
publishDate 2024-06-01
publisher Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. RANEPA
record_format Article
series Шаги
spelling doaj-art-00cd6fc1d415430f999e63c1a7beb3f72025-08-20T03:51:13ZengRussian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. RANEPAШаги2412-94102782-17652024-06-0110226828310.22394/2412-9410-2024-10-2-268-283184The myth of Narcissus: Metamorphoses of medieval commentaryI. K. Staf0Институт мировой литературы им. А. М. Горького РАНThis article traces two types of commentaries on the myth of Narcissus (Ovid, The Metamorphoses, III), which existed in the Middle Ages in French literature in the vernacular — the courtly and the moral and allegorical. The first type of commentary is represented by individual works in which this myth is mentioned (“The Lay of Narcissus”, “The Romance of the Rose”, “The Book of Love Chess” by Evrart de Conty). In these, Ovid’s personage is treated as a violator of Amor’s laws; consequently, he takes on the traits of the “Belle Dame sans merci”. Commentaries of the second kind, such as the poetic and prose versions of “Moralized Ovid” (Ovide moralisé), interpret the figure of Narcissus as the embodiment of the Christian sin of pride, and of Echo as the good name disregarded by the proud man. This second type of commentary fragments the text of the “Metamorphoses” into separate stories and personages, each with its own allegorical meaning. The figure of Narcissus and the story of his death becomes a didactic exemplum that can be used in a sermon. In addition, by the early 15th century, such commentaries had been adopted into treatises on poetry (seconde rhétorique) and poetics (poetria, poetic fiction). In them, Narcissus becomes a rhetorical figure destined to create poetic works of high style. The logical conclusion of this process of fragmentation, which is also embodied in the miniatures of illuminated manuscripts, is the appearance in the 16th century of a new form which Ovid’s poem takes, the form of a collection of emblems.https://steps.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/185ovidfrancemiddle agescommentarynarcissuscourtly literature“moralized ovid”fragmentrhetorical figureemblem
spellingShingle I. K. Staf
The myth of Narcissus: Metamorphoses of medieval commentary
Шаги
ovid
france
middle ages
commentary
narcissus
courtly literature
“moralized ovid”
fragment
rhetorical figure
emblem
title The myth of Narcissus: Metamorphoses of medieval commentary
title_full The myth of Narcissus: Metamorphoses of medieval commentary
title_fullStr The myth of Narcissus: Metamorphoses of medieval commentary
title_full_unstemmed The myth of Narcissus: Metamorphoses of medieval commentary
title_short The myth of Narcissus: Metamorphoses of medieval commentary
title_sort myth of narcissus metamorphoses of medieval commentary
topic ovid
france
middle ages
commentary
narcissus
courtly literature
“moralized ovid”
fragment
rhetorical figure
emblem
url https://steps.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/185
work_keys_str_mv AT ikstaf themythofnarcissusmetamorphosesofmedievalcommentary
AT ikstaf mythofnarcissusmetamorphosesofmedievalcommentary