How well do mothers recall their own and their infants’ perinatal events? A two-district study using cross-sectional stratified random sampling in Bihar, India

Objective Global monitoring of maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) programmes use self-reported data subject to recall error which may lead to incorrect decisions for improving health services and wasted resources. To minimise this risk, samples of mothers of infants aged 0–2 and 3–5 months ar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Caroline Jeffery, Joseph James Valadez, Baburam Devkota, Wilbur C Hadden
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/12/e031289.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850219682090450944
author Caroline Jeffery
Joseph James Valadez
Baburam Devkota
Wilbur C Hadden
author_facet Caroline Jeffery
Joseph James Valadez
Baburam Devkota
Wilbur C Hadden
author_sort Caroline Jeffery
collection DOAJ
description Objective Global monitoring of maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) programmes use self-reported data subject to recall error which may lead to incorrect decisions for improving health services and wasted resources. To minimise this risk, samples of mothers of infants aged 0–2 and 3–5 months are sometimes used. We test whether a single sample of mothers of infants aged 0–5 months provides the same information.Design An annual MNCH household survey in two districts of Bihar, India (n=6 million).Participants Independent samples (n=475 each) of mothers of infants aged 0–5, 0–2 and 3–5 months.Outcome measures Main analyses compare responses from the samples of infants aged 0–5 and 0–2 months with Mantel-Haenszel-Cochran statistics using 51 indicators in two districts.Results No measurable differences are detected in 79.4% (81/102) comparisons; 20.6% (21/102) display differences for the main comparison. Subanalyses produce similar results. A difference detected for exclusive breast feeding is due to premature complementary feeding by older infants. Measurable differences are detected in 33% (8/24) of the indicators on Front Line Worker (FLW) support, 26.9% (7/26) of indicators of birth preparedness and place of birth and attendant, and 9.5% (4/42) of the indicators on neonatal and antenatal care.Conclusions Differences in FLW visits and compliance with their advice may be due to seasonal effects: mothers of older infants aged 3–5 months were pregnant during the dry season; mothers of infants aged 0–2 months were pregnant during the monsoons, making transportation difficult. Useful coverage estimates can be obtained by sampling mothers with infants aged 0–5 months as with two samples suggesting that mothers of young infants recall their own perinatal events and those of their children. For some indicators (eg, exclusive breast feeding), it may be necessary to adjust targets. Excessive stratification wastes resources, does not improve the quality of information and increases the burden placed on data collectors and communities which can increase non-sampling error.
format Article
id doaj-art-00cb54f0ae2a460ba232d459be314760
institution OA Journals
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-00cb54f0ae2a460ba232d459be3147602025-08-20T02:07:19ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552019-12-0191210.1136/bmjopen-2019-031289How well do mothers recall their own and their infants’ perinatal events? A two-district study using cross-sectional stratified random sampling in Bihar, IndiaCaroline Jeffery0Joseph James Valadez1Baburam Devkota2Wilbur C Hadden32 Department of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK1 International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK1 International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UKDepartment of Sociology, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, Maryland, USAObjective Global monitoring of maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) programmes use self-reported data subject to recall error which may lead to incorrect decisions for improving health services and wasted resources. To minimise this risk, samples of mothers of infants aged 0–2 and 3–5 months are sometimes used. We test whether a single sample of mothers of infants aged 0–5 months provides the same information.Design An annual MNCH household survey in two districts of Bihar, India (n=6 million).Participants Independent samples (n=475 each) of mothers of infants aged 0–5, 0–2 and 3–5 months.Outcome measures Main analyses compare responses from the samples of infants aged 0–5 and 0–2 months with Mantel-Haenszel-Cochran statistics using 51 indicators in two districts.Results No measurable differences are detected in 79.4% (81/102) comparisons; 20.6% (21/102) display differences for the main comparison. Subanalyses produce similar results. A difference detected for exclusive breast feeding is due to premature complementary feeding by older infants. Measurable differences are detected in 33% (8/24) of the indicators on Front Line Worker (FLW) support, 26.9% (7/26) of indicators of birth preparedness and place of birth and attendant, and 9.5% (4/42) of the indicators on neonatal and antenatal care.Conclusions Differences in FLW visits and compliance with their advice may be due to seasonal effects: mothers of older infants aged 3–5 months were pregnant during the dry season; mothers of infants aged 0–2 months were pregnant during the monsoons, making transportation difficult. Useful coverage estimates can be obtained by sampling mothers with infants aged 0–5 months as with two samples suggesting that mothers of young infants recall their own perinatal events and those of their children. For some indicators (eg, exclusive breast feeding), it may be necessary to adjust targets. Excessive stratification wastes resources, does not improve the quality of information and increases the burden placed on data collectors and communities which can increase non-sampling error.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/12/e031289.full
spellingShingle Caroline Jeffery
Joseph James Valadez
Baburam Devkota
Wilbur C Hadden
How well do mothers recall their own and their infants’ perinatal events? A two-district study using cross-sectional stratified random sampling in Bihar, India
BMJ Open
title How well do mothers recall their own and their infants’ perinatal events? A two-district study using cross-sectional stratified random sampling in Bihar, India
title_full How well do mothers recall their own and their infants’ perinatal events? A two-district study using cross-sectional stratified random sampling in Bihar, India
title_fullStr How well do mothers recall their own and their infants’ perinatal events? A two-district study using cross-sectional stratified random sampling in Bihar, India
title_full_unstemmed How well do mothers recall their own and their infants’ perinatal events? A two-district study using cross-sectional stratified random sampling in Bihar, India
title_short How well do mothers recall their own and their infants’ perinatal events? A two-district study using cross-sectional stratified random sampling in Bihar, India
title_sort how well do mothers recall their own and their infants perinatal events a two district study using cross sectional stratified random sampling in bihar india
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/12/e031289.full
work_keys_str_mv AT carolinejeffery howwelldomothersrecalltheirownandtheirinfantsperinataleventsatwodistrictstudyusingcrosssectionalstratifiedrandomsamplinginbiharindia
AT josephjamesvaladez howwelldomothersrecalltheirownandtheirinfantsperinataleventsatwodistrictstudyusingcrosssectionalstratifiedrandomsamplinginbiharindia
AT baburamdevkota howwelldomothersrecalltheirownandtheirinfantsperinataleventsatwodistrictstudyusingcrosssectionalstratifiedrandomsamplinginbiharindia
AT wilburchadden howwelldomothersrecalltheirownandtheirinfantsperinataleventsatwodistrictstudyusingcrosssectionalstratifiedrandomsamplinginbiharindia