DIGITAL TOOLS FOR MONITORING THE QUALITY OF UNIVERSITY EDUCATION

The article is devoted to the study of the quality assurance issues in higher education. Based on the analysis of international regulations on quality assurance and methodologies of international and Ukrainian ratings, the authors identify key areas of monitoring and relevant indicators of internal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oksana Buinytska, Valeriia Smirnova, Bohdan Hrytseliak, Anastasiia Tiutiunnyk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University 2025-06-01
Series:Неперервна професійна освіта: теорія та практика
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849425151203999744
author Oksana Buinytska
Valeriia Smirnova
Bohdan Hrytseliak
Anastasiia Tiutiunnyk
author_facet Oksana Buinytska
Valeriia Smirnova
Bohdan Hrytseliak
Anastasiia Tiutiunnyk
author_sort Oksana Buinytska
collection DOAJ
description The article is devoted to the study of the quality assurance issues in higher education. Based on the analysis of international regulations on quality assurance and methodologies of international and Ukrainian ratings, the authors identify key areas of monitoring and relevant indicators of internal assessment. They affect the quality, and the relationship between them provides a comprehensive assessment of the quality of higher education. The key to ensuring high-quality education at a university is the introduction of internal assessment with key indicators using digital tools, which allows collecting and analyzing data, processing large amounts of data to make informed decisions, supporting effective management, administration, and visualization of performance. Conducting systematic monitoring with the identified indicators allows systematic evaluation of the effectiveness of educational activities, timely identification of areas for improvement, and ensures compliance with European standards of education quality. The article presents the results of the analysis of the key indicators of Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University in the areas of «Reputational support of the educational process», «Reputational attractiveness of educational content», «Teaching reputation», «International reputation», «Academic reputation», which allows not only to assess the current level of the quality of educational services but also to obtain the dynamics of its changes.
format Article
id doaj-art-00a682b115ac4bfa8d88b5ff2d637770
institution Kabale University
issn 2412-0774
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University
record_format Article
series Неперервна професійна освіта: теорія та практика
spelling doaj-art-00a682b115ac4bfa8d88b5ff2d6377702025-08-20T03:29:52ZengBorys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan UniversityНеперервна професійна освіта: теорія та практика2412-07742025-06-01283647810.28925/1609-8595.2025.2.6DIGITAL TOOLS FOR MONITORING THE QUALITY OF UNIVERSITY EDUCATIONOksana Buinytska 0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3611-2114Valeriia Smirnova1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9965-6373Bohdan Hrytseliak2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2953-8560Anastasiia Tiutiunnyk3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2909-7697Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan UniversityBorys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan UniversityBorys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan UniversityBorys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan UniversityThe article is devoted to the study of the quality assurance issues in higher education. Based on the analysis of international regulations on quality assurance and methodologies of international and Ukrainian ratings, the authors identify key areas of monitoring and relevant indicators of internal assessment. They affect the quality, and the relationship between them provides a comprehensive assessment of the quality of higher education. The key to ensuring high-quality education at a university is the introduction of internal assessment with key indicators using digital tools, which allows collecting and analyzing data, processing large amounts of data to make informed decisions, supporting effective management, administration, and visualization of performance. Conducting systematic monitoring with the identified indicators allows systematic evaluation of the effectiveness of educational activities, timely identification of areas for improvement, and ensures compliance with European standards of education quality. The article presents the results of the analysis of the key indicators of Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University in the areas of «Reputational support of the educational process», «Reputational attractiveness of educational content», «Teaching reputation», «International reputation», «Academic reputation», which allows not only to assess the current level of the quality of educational services but also to obtain the dynamics of its changes.digital toolshigher education qualitymonitoringuniversity rankingsinternal assessmentreputation.
spellingShingle Oksana Buinytska
Valeriia Smirnova
Bohdan Hrytseliak
Anastasiia Tiutiunnyk
DIGITAL TOOLS FOR MONITORING THE QUALITY OF UNIVERSITY EDUCATION
Неперервна професійна освіта: теорія та практика
digital tools
higher education quality
monitoring
university rankings
internal assessment
reputation.
title DIGITAL TOOLS FOR MONITORING THE QUALITY OF UNIVERSITY EDUCATION
title_full DIGITAL TOOLS FOR MONITORING THE QUALITY OF UNIVERSITY EDUCATION
title_fullStr DIGITAL TOOLS FOR MONITORING THE QUALITY OF UNIVERSITY EDUCATION
title_full_unstemmed DIGITAL TOOLS FOR MONITORING THE QUALITY OF UNIVERSITY EDUCATION
title_short DIGITAL TOOLS FOR MONITORING THE QUALITY OF UNIVERSITY EDUCATION
title_sort digital tools for monitoring the quality of university education
topic digital tools
higher education quality
monitoring
university rankings
internal assessment
reputation.
work_keys_str_mv AT oksanabuinytska digitaltoolsformonitoringthequalityofuniversityeducation
AT valeriiasmirnova digitaltoolsformonitoringthequalityofuniversityeducation
AT bohdanhrytseliak digitaltoolsformonitoringthequalityofuniversityeducation
AT anastasiiatiutiunnyk digitaltoolsformonitoringthequalityofuniversityeducation