Back-Calculation of Soil Modulus from PFWD Based on a Viscoelastic Model

To improve the accuracy of back-calculation of soil modulus using the portable falling weight deflectometer (PFWD), a viscoelastic method (VEM) overcoming the limitations of the conventional linear elastic method (LEM) was proposed. A quasi-static dynamic analysis technique of Laplace transformation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rui Zhang, Tianzeng Ren, Md Ashrafuzzaman Khan, Yusheng Teng, Jianlong Zheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:Advances in Civil Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1316341
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832550949491572736
author Rui Zhang
Tianzeng Ren
Md Ashrafuzzaman Khan
Yusheng Teng
Jianlong Zheng
author_facet Rui Zhang
Tianzeng Ren
Md Ashrafuzzaman Khan
Yusheng Teng
Jianlong Zheng
author_sort Rui Zhang
collection DOAJ
description To improve the accuracy of back-calculation of soil modulus using the portable falling weight deflectometer (PFWD), a viscoelastic method (VEM) overcoming the limitations of the conventional linear elastic method (LEM) was proposed. A quasi-static dynamic analysis technique of Laplace transformation and a modified Gauss–Newton optimization algorithm were adopted in the proposed method. The back-calculation program was compiled with MATLAB. The effectiveness of the proposed method was verified with the in situ plate load test (PLT) conducted on a highway embankment. In situ test results showed that a time lag existed between the peaks of deflection and load, and load-deflection curves were nonlinear, which indicated the viscoelastic nature of the soil. The back-calculated modulus using the LEM and VEM was higher than that using the PLT. In the case of low stiffness soil, the average error of back-calculation using the LEM and VEM was 53.1% and 14.8%, respectively. However, for stiffer soil, the average error of back-calculation using the LEM and VEM method was 12.4% and 4.3%, respectively. Moduli of back-calculation using LEM and VEM methods were used to perform flexible pavement analysis, which showed that with an 8% reduction of modulus, the pavement service life reduced by 25%. More accurate estimation of modulus can save maintenance cost in the future.
format Article
id doaj-art-009048bb7a7b45c79f7e63d7bed738b9
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8086
1687-8094
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Civil Engineering
spelling doaj-art-009048bb7a7b45c79f7e63d7bed738b92025-02-03T06:05:23ZengWileyAdvances in Civil Engineering1687-80861687-80942019-01-01201910.1155/2019/13163411316341Back-Calculation of Soil Modulus from PFWD Based on a Viscoelastic ModelRui Zhang0Tianzeng Ren1Md Ashrafuzzaman Khan2Yusheng Teng3Jianlong Zheng4National Engineering Laboratory for Highway Maintenance Technology, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410114, ChinaSchool of Traffic and Transport Engineering, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410114, ChinaCivil and Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77840, USASchool of Traffic and Transport Engineering, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410114, ChinaNational Engineering Laboratory for Highway Maintenance Technology, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410114, ChinaTo improve the accuracy of back-calculation of soil modulus using the portable falling weight deflectometer (PFWD), a viscoelastic method (VEM) overcoming the limitations of the conventional linear elastic method (LEM) was proposed. A quasi-static dynamic analysis technique of Laplace transformation and a modified Gauss–Newton optimization algorithm were adopted in the proposed method. The back-calculation program was compiled with MATLAB. The effectiveness of the proposed method was verified with the in situ plate load test (PLT) conducted on a highway embankment. In situ test results showed that a time lag existed between the peaks of deflection and load, and load-deflection curves were nonlinear, which indicated the viscoelastic nature of the soil. The back-calculated modulus using the LEM and VEM was higher than that using the PLT. In the case of low stiffness soil, the average error of back-calculation using the LEM and VEM was 53.1% and 14.8%, respectively. However, for stiffer soil, the average error of back-calculation using the LEM and VEM method was 12.4% and 4.3%, respectively. Moduli of back-calculation using LEM and VEM methods were used to perform flexible pavement analysis, which showed that with an 8% reduction of modulus, the pavement service life reduced by 25%. More accurate estimation of modulus can save maintenance cost in the future.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1316341
spellingShingle Rui Zhang
Tianzeng Ren
Md Ashrafuzzaman Khan
Yusheng Teng
Jianlong Zheng
Back-Calculation of Soil Modulus from PFWD Based on a Viscoelastic Model
Advances in Civil Engineering
title Back-Calculation of Soil Modulus from PFWD Based on a Viscoelastic Model
title_full Back-Calculation of Soil Modulus from PFWD Based on a Viscoelastic Model
title_fullStr Back-Calculation of Soil Modulus from PFWD Based on a Viscoelastic Model
title_full_unstemmed Back-Calculation of Soil Modulus from PFWD Based on a Viscoelastic Model
title_short Back-Calculation of Soil Modulus from PFWD Based on a Viscoelastic Model
title_sort back calculation of soil modulus from pfwd based on a viscoelastic model
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1316341
work_keys_str_mv AT ruizhang backcalculationofsoilmodulusfrompfwdbasedonaviscoelasticmodel
AT tianzengren backcalculationofsoilmodulusfrompfwdbasedonaviscoelasticmodel
AT mdashrafuzzamankhan backcalculationofsoilmodulusfrompfwdbasedonaviscoelasticmodel
AT yushengteng backcalculationofsoilmodulusfrompfwdbasedonaviscoelasticmodel
AT jianlongzheng backcalculationofsoilmodulusfrompfwdbasedonaviscoelasticmodel