Biomechanical comparison of various implant inclinations and abutment types in a bendable implant system
Abstract Background This study aims to evaluate the stress distribution in peri-implant bone, implant surfaces, and within the framework material under vertical and oblique loads, considering various angulations and abutment types of bendable one-piece implants in the All-on-4 concept. Methods A thr...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | BMC Oral Health |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06610-1 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849332437835841536 |
|---|---|
| author | Esra Bilgi-Ozyetim Gökçen Dinçer Ammar Sulaiman Süleyman Çağatay Dayan Sevcan Kurtulmus-Yilmaz Onur Geçkili |
| author_facet | Esra Bilgi-Ozyetim Gökçen Dinçer Ammar Sulaiman Süleyman Çağatay Dayan Sevcan Kurtulmus-Yilmaz Onur Geçkili |
| author_sort | Esra Bilgi-Ozyetim |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background This study aims to evaluate the stress distribution in peri-implant bone, implant surfaces, and within the framework material under vertical and oblique loads, considering various angulations and abutment types of bendable one-piece implants in the All-on-4 concept. Methods A three-dimensional model of an edentulous mandible was constructed. Six different configurations were modeled according to prosthesis connection type and inclination of the posterior implants based on the All-on-4 protocol. Four one-piece implants were placed in each model and a cobalt-chromium frameworks with 14 mm cantilever lengths were designed. Under vertical and oblique loading conditions, maximum principal stress and minimum principal stress values were obtained for cortical and trabecular bone and von Mises stress values were calculated for implants and frameworks. Results Implant angulation, connection type, and loading conditions affected stress distribution in the peri-implant bone, implants, and frameworks. Higher stress values were observed in posterior implants with increased angulation. Screw-retained models demonstrated greater stress values compared to cement-retained ones under both loading conditions. Conclusions For optimal stress distribution in peri-implant bone and frameworks, cement-retained prosthesis may be preferred, especially in cases with increased implant angulation in one-piece bendable systems. Additionally, careful consideration of posterior implant angulation and loading conditions is crucial to minimize the excessive stress and to enhance long-term stability. Clinical trial number Not applicable. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-005dda8f18b34572b17d02e2f147c200 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1472-6831 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-07-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Oral Health |
| spelling | doaj-art-005dda8f18b34572b17d02e2f147c2002025-08-20T03:46:12ZengBMCBMC Oral Health1472-68312025-07-0125111310.1186/s12903-025-06610-1Biomechanical comparison of various implant inclinations and abutment types in a bendable implant systemEsra Bilgi-Ozyetim0Gökçen Dinçer1Ammar Sulaiman2Süleyman Çağatay Dayan3Sevcan Kurtulmus-Yilmaz4Onur Geçkili5Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Yeni Yuzyil UniversityDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul UniversityPrivate ClinicProgram of Dental Technicians, Istanbul University-CerrahpaşaDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East UniversityDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul UniversityAbstract Background This study aims to evaluate the stress distribution in peri-implant bone, implant surfaces, and within the framework material under vertical and oblique loads, considering various angulations and abutment types of bendable one-piece implants in the All-on-4 concept. Methods A three-dimensional model of an edentulous mandible was constructed. Six different configurations were modeled according to prosthesis connection type and inclination of the posterior implants based on the All-on-4 protocol. Four one-piece implants were placed in each model and a cobalt-chromium frameworks with 14 mm cantilever lengths were designed. Under vertical and oblique loading conditions, maximum principal stress and minimum principal stress values were obtained for cortical and trabecular bone and von Mises stress values were calculated for implants and frameworks. Results Implant angulation, connection type, and loading conditions affected stress distribution in the peri-implant bone, implants, and frameworks. Higher stress values were observed in posterior implants with increased angulation. Screw-retained models demonstrated greater stress values compared to cement-retained ones under both loading conditions. Conclusions For optimal stress distribution in peri-implant bone and frameworks, cement-retained prosthesis may be preferred, especially in cases with increased implant angulation in one-piece bendable systems. Additionally, careful consideration of posterior implant angulation and loading conditions is crucial to minimize the excessive stress and to enhance long-term stability. Clinical trial number Not applicable.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06610-1Bendable implantOne-piece implantFinite element analysisStress distributionAll-on-4Angulated implant |
| spellingShingle | Esra Bilgi-Ozyetim Gökçen Dinçer Ammar Sulaiman Süleyman Çağatay Dayan Sevcan Kurtulmus-Yilmaz Onur Geçkili Biomechanical comparison of various implant inclinations and abutment types in a bendable implant system BMC Oral Health Bendable implant One-piece implant Finite element analysis Stress distribution All-on-4 Angulated implant |
| title | Biomechanical comparison of various implant inclinations and abutment types in a bendable implant system |
| title_full | Biomechanical comparison of various implant inclinations and abutment types in a bendable implant system |
| title_fullStr | Biomechanical comparison of various implant inclinations and abutment types in a bendable implant system |
| title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanical comparison of various implant inclinations and abutment types in a bendable implant system |
| title_short | Biomechanical comparison of various implant inclinations and abutment types in a bendable implant system |
| title_sort | biomechanical comparison of various implant inclinations and abutment types in a bendable implant system |
| topic | Bendable implant One-piece implant Finite element analysis Stress distribution All-on-4 Angulated implant |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06610-1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT esrabilgiozyetim biomechanicalcomparisonofvariousimplantinclinationsandabutmenttypesinabendableimplantsystem AT gokcendincer biomechanicalcomparisonofvariousimplantinclinationsandabutmenttypesinabendableimplantsystem AT ammarsulaiman biomechanicalcomparisonofvariousimplantinclinationsandabutmenttypesinabendableimplantsystem AT suleymancagataydayan biomechanicalcomparisonofvariousimplantinclinationsandabutmenttypesinabendableimplantsystem AT sevcankurtulmusyilmaz biomechanicalcomparisonofvariousimplantinclinationsandabutmenttypesinabendableimplantsystem AT onurgeckili biomechanicalcomparisonofvariousimplantinclinationsandabutmenttypesinabendableimplantsystem |