Assessment of Debris Extrusion in Curved Canals: An In Vitro Analysis of Various Single-File Endodontic Instrumentation Systems

Objectives. Rotary single-file endodontic systems are commonly used for root canal treatment. However, very few studies have evaluated the apical extrusion of debris generated by these systems during canal preparation at normal body temperature in laboratory conditions. The aim of this study was to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Muhammad Zubair Ahmad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-01-01
Series:International Journal of Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/8367693
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832546104050188288
author Muhammad Zubair Ahmad
author_facet Muhammad Zubair Ahmad
author_sort Muhammad Zubair Ahmad
collection DOAJ
description Objectives. Rotary single-file endodontic systems are commonly used for root canal treatment. However, very few studies have evaluated the apical extrusion of debris generated by these systems during canal preparation at normal body temperature in laboratory conditions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris caused by seven different single-file endodontic instrumentation systems at body temperature in mandibular molar teeth with curved root canals. Methods. One hundred forty mandibular first permanent molars were randomly divided into seven groups (n = 20) to be prepared by one of the following systems at 35°C: Reciproc Blue (REC Blue), WaveOne Gold (WOG), One Reci (OR), Neoniti, HyFlex EDM (HEDM), One Curve (OC), or XP Shaper (XPS). Debris was collected into preweighted Eppendorf tubes. The weight of the extruded debris was recorded by subtracting the weight of the tooth-free apparatus from the post-procedure weight. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests (p <5%). Results. REC Blue, WOG, and OR groups extruded significantly more debris from the apex than XPS, OC, and Neoniti groups (p <0.05). No significant difference was observed among the XPS, OC, Neoniti, and HEDM groups (p >0.05). Conclusion. All the instruments were associated with debris extrusion. However, REC Blue, WOG, and OR extrude significantly more debris than other instruments. The amount of debris with different files was REC Blue > OR > WOG > HEDM > OC > Neoniti > XPS. XPS, Neoniti, and OC caused significantly less extrusion of debris than REC Blue, WOG, and OR.
format Article
id doaj-art-00586b3619504814938d47a3696ab26c
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8736
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Dentistry
spelling doaj-art-00586b3619504814938d47a3696ab26c2025-02-03T07:23:46ZengWileyInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87362024-01-01202410.1155/2024/8367693Assessment of Debris Extrusion in Curved Canals: An In Vitro Analysis of Various Single-File Endodontic Instrumentation SystemsMuhammad Zubair Ahmad0Department of Conservative Dental SciencesObjectives. Rotary single-file endodontic systems are commonly used for root canal treatment. However, very few studies have evaluated the apical extrusion of debris generated by these systems during canal preparation at normal body temperature in laboratory conditions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris caused by seven different single-file endodontic instrumentation systems at body temperature in mandibular molar teeth with curved root canals. Methods. One hundred forty mandibular first permanent molars were randomly divided into seven groups (n = 20) to be prepared by one of the following systems at 35°C: Reciproc Blue (REC Blue), WaveOne Gold (WOG), One Reci (OR), Neoniti, HyFlex EDM (HEDM), One Curve (OC), or XP Shaper (XPS). Debris was collected into preweighted Eppendorf tubes. The weight of the extruded debris was recorded by subtracting the weight of the tooth-free apparatus from the post-procedure weight. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests (p <5%). Results. REC Blue, WOG, and OR groups extruded significantly more debris from the apex than XPS, OC, and Neoniti groups (p <0.05). No significant difference was observed among the XPS, OC, Neoniti, and HEDM groups (p >0.05). Conclusion. All the instruments were associated with debris extrusion. However, REC Blue, WOG, and OR extrude significantly more debris than other instruments. The amount of debris with different files was REC Blue > OR > WOG > HEDM > OC > Neoniti > XPS. XPS, Neoniti, and OC caused significantly less extrusion of debris than REC Blue, WOG, and OR.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/8367693
spellingShingle Muhammad Zubair Ahmad
Assessment of Debris Extrusion in Curved Canals: An In Vitro Analysis of Various Single-File Endodontic Instrumentation Systems
International Journal of Dentistry
title Assessment of Debris Extrusion in Curved Canals: An In Vitro Analysis of Various Single-File Endodontic Instrumentation Systems
title_full Assessment of Debris Extrusion in Curved Canals: An In Vitro Analysis of Various Single-File Endodontic Instrumentation Systems
title_fullStr Assessment of Debris Extrusion in Curved Canals: An In Vitro Analysis of Various Single-File Endodontic Instrumentation Systems
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Debris Extrusion in Curved Canals: An In Vitro Analysis of Various Single-File Endodontic Instrumentation Systems
title_short Assessment of Debris Extrusion in Curved Canals: An In Vitro Analysis of Various Single-File Endodontic Instrumentation Systems
title_sort assessment of debris extrusion in curved canals an in vitro analysis of various single file endodontic instrumentation systems
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/8367693
work_keys_str_mv AT muhammadzubairahmad assessmentofdebrisextrusionincurvedcanalsaninvitroanalysisofvarioussinglefileendodonticinstrumentationsystems