SIU-ICUD: Principles and Outcomes of Focal Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Focal therapy (FT) for prostate cancer (PCa) is an alternative to radical treatments that aims to balance cancer control and quality of life preservation in well-selected patients. Understanding its general principles and outcomes is key for its widespread a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alessandro Marquis, Jonathan Olivier, Tavya G. R. Benjamin, Eric Barret, Giancarlo Marra, Claire Deleuze, Lucas Bento, Kae J. Tay, Hashim U. Ahmed, Mark Emberton, Arnauld Villers, Thomas J. Polascik, Ardeshir R. Rastinehad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-06-01
Series:Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2563-6499/6/3/42
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Focal therapy (FT) for prostate cancer (PCa) is an alternative to radical treatments that aims to balance cancer control and quality of life preservation in well-selected patients. Understanding its general principles and outcomes is key for its widespread adoption and proper implementation. <b>Methods</b>: The International Consultation on Urological Diseases nominated a committee to review the literature on FT for PCa. A comprehensive PubMed search was conducted to identify articles focused on the different aspects of FT, including patient selection, imaging techniques, treatment modalities, cancer control and safety outcomes, integration with other approaches and future perspectives. <b>Results</b>: FT for PCa was introduced in the 1990s with cryotherapy and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) as pioneering modalities. Though initially guided by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and large biopsy templates, FT implementation expanded significantly with the advent of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the validation of the index lesion concept. Appropriate patient selection is key for FT and relies on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) metrics, MRI findings and targeted biopsy information. Multiple energy sources are now available, each with specific technical characteristics. Cancer control rates vary by energy modality, tumor characteristics, and institutional experience, demonstrating comparable outcomes to radical treatments in well-selected patients. The safety profile is excellent, with high rates of urinary continence and sexual function preservation. Post-treatment surveillance integrates PSA measurements, imaging, and histological assessment. Future directions for further FT adoption include the availability of long-term data, protocol standardization and technological improvements to enhance patient selection and treatment planning and delivery. <b>Conclusions</b>: FT is a valuable therapeutic option for selected patients with localized PCa, demonstrating promising oncological outcomes and better functional preservation compared to radical treatments. Understanding its principles and technical aspects is essential for offering comprehensive PCa care.
ISSN:2563-6499