The Monroe Doctrine: Republicans’ Perspective in the Formation Years of the Versailles-Washington System

The Monroe Doctrine occupies a unique place in the US history. It became one of the key foreign policy documents of its time and provided the basis for a wide variety of interpretations of the United States’ role and goals in the international arena at turning points of world history. One of these m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: S. O. Buranok
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Moscow University Press 2023-12-01
Series:Вестник Московского Университета. Серия XXV: Международные отношения и мировая политика
Subjects:
Online Access:https://fmp.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/188
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832572180051787776
author S. O. Buranok
author_facet S. O. Buranok
author_sort S. O. Buranok
collection DOAJ
description The Monroe Doctrine occupies a unique place in the US history. It became one of the key foreign policy documents of its time and provided the basis for a wide variety of interpretations of the United States’ role and goals in the international arena at turning points of world history. One of these moments was the turn of the 1910s−1920s, when a new Versailles-Washington order of international relations was emerging. In the US public discourse, this period was marked by intense debates between supporters of the Democratic President V. Wilson and his isolationist opponents. Both Republicans and Democrats constantly referred to the Monroe Doctrine, on the one hand, to justify their own views on US foreign policy in the new conditions, and, on the other hand, to refute the arguments of their political opponents. The controversy surrounding the Monroe Doctrine has been reflected in publications in periodicals and analytical journals, as well as in cartoons. Studying these materials, it is possible to trace the evolution of the approaches of American politicians, experts, editors, and journalists to the Monroe Doctrine. The arguments of the Republicans against the ‘internationalist’ interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine that emerged in the face of the changing global context after the First World War are of particular interest. The study shows that at the initial stage of discussions (1920), the Monroe Doctrine was used by the Republicans primarily to criticize W. Wilson’s concept of international relations in general and his position on the League of Nations in particular. At the next stage (1921−1923), the debate focused around the need to revise the Monroe Doctrine itself, that aroused due to new trends in the development of international relations in the Far East and, in particular, because of the increasing competition between the United States and Japan. The author identifies several main approaches to the interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine formulated during the public debate in 1921−1923. It is shown that, despite significant divergences of view, both isolationists and internationalists eventually came to broader interpretations of the Monroe Doctrine, recognizing the need to extend its principles to the entire Asia-Pacific region.
format Article
id doaj-art-001563544cf34a1fafe7a308e5dffff3
institution Kabale University
issn 2076-7404
language English
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Moscow University Press
record_format Article
series Вестник Московского Университета. Серия XXV: Международные отношения и мировая политика
spelling doaj-art-001563544cf34a1fafe7a308e5dffff32025-02-02T11:10:32ZengMoscow University PressВестник Московского Университета. Серия XXV: Международные отношения и мировая политика2076-74042023-12-01153568610.48015/2076-7404-2023-15-3-56-86171The Monroe Doctrine: Republicans’ Perspective in the Formation Years of the Versailles-Washington SystemS. O. Buranok0Samara State University of Social Sciences and EducationThe Monroe Doctrine occupies a unique place in the US history. It became one of the key foreign policy documents of its time and provided the basis for a wide variety of interpretations of the United States’ role and goals in the international arena at turning points of world history. One of these moments was the turn of the 1910s−1920s, when a new Versailles-Washington order of international relations was emerging. In the US public discourse, this period was marked by intense debates between supporters of the Democratic President V. Wilson and his isolationist opponents. Both Republicans and Democrats constantly referred to the Monroe Doctrine, on the one hand, to justify their own views on US foreign policy in the new conditions, and, on the other hand, to refute the arguments of their political opponents. The controversy surrounding the Monroe Doctrine has been reflected in publications in periodicals and analytical journals, as well as in cartoons. Studying these materials, it is possible to trace the evolution of the approaches of American politicians, experts, editors, and journalists to the Monroe Doctrine. The arguments of the Republicans against the ‘internationalist’ interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine that emerged in the face of the changing global context after the First World War are of particular interest. The study shows that at the initial stage of discussions (1920), the Monroe Doctrine was used by the Republicans primarily to criticize W. Wilson’s concept of international relations in general and his position on the League of Nations in particular. At the next stage (1921−1923), the debate focused around the need to revise the Monroe Doctrine itself, that aroused due to new trends in the development of international relations in the Far East and, in particular, because of the increasing competition between the United States and Japan. The author identifies several main approaches to the interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine formulated during the public debate in 1921−1923. It is shown that, despite significant divergences of view, both isolationists and internationalists eventually came to broader interpretations of the Monroe Doctrine, recognizing the need to extend its principles to the entire Asia-Pacific region.https://fmp.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/188monroe doctrineus foreign policytreaty of versailleswashington conferenceversailles-washington systemlatin americaisolationisminternationalismimperialismcolonialismleague of nationsopen door policywoodrow wilsonhenry lodge
spellingShingle S. O. Buranok
The Monroe Doctrine: Republicans’ Perspective in the Formation Years of the Versailles-Washington System
Вестник Московского Университета. Серия XXV: Международные отношения и мировая политика
monroe doctrine
us foreign policy
treaty of versailles
washington conference
versailles-washington system
latin america
isolationism
internationalism
imperialism
colonialism
league of nations
open door policy
woodrow wilson
henry lodge
title The Monroe Doctrine: Republicans’ Perspective in the Formation Years of the Versailles-Washington System
title_full The Monroe Doctrine: Republicans’ Perspective in the Formation Years of the Versailles-Washington System
title_fullStr The Monroe Doctrine: Republicans’ Perspective in the Formation Years of the Versailles-Washington System
title_full_unstemmed The Monroe Doctrine: Republicans’ Perspective in the Formation Years of the Versailles-Washington System
title_short The Monroe Doctrine: Republicans’ Perspective in the Formation Years of the Versailles-Washington System
title_sort monroe doctrine republicans perspective in the formation years of the versailles washington system
topic monroe doctrine
us foreign policy
treaty of versailles
washington conference
versailles-washington system
latin america
isolationism
internationalism
imperialism
colonialism
league of nations
open door policy
woodrow wilson
henry lodge
url https://fmp.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/188
work_keys_str_mv AT soburanok themonroedoctrinerepublicansperspectiveintheformationyearsoftheversailleswashingtonsystem
AT soburanok monroedoctrinerepublicansperspectiveintheformationyearsoftheversailleswashingtonsystem